SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mathematical and Computational Applications / 2005 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

A comparison of the stress analysis of an unrestored and restored tooth with amalgam and composite resin

Halil AYKUL
Mustafa TOPARLI
Pages
89–98
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The distributions of radial axial and shear stresses were plotted with length of radial for some critical points.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Finite element models were developed for an unrestored tooth and restored tooth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A load of 200 N at an angle of 45° to the radial axis was applied on the occlusal margin of the tooth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The distributions of radial axial and shear stresses were plotted with length of radial for some critical points.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Finite element models were developed for an unrestored tooth and restored tooth. The tooth was considered to be in a restored state with amalgam and composite resin on glass-ionomer as the base material. For this study, an axisymmetric model of a maxillary second premolar that included an alveolar bone was used. A load of 200 N at an angle of 45° to the radial axis was applied on the occlusal margin of the tooth. The tooth was assumed isotropic, homogenous and elastic. The authors using FORTRAN 11 prepared all calculation programs. The distributions of radial axial and shear stresses were plotted with length of radial for some critical points.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYKUL, H., TOPARLI, M. (2005). A comparison of the stress analysis of an unrestored and restored tooth with amalgam and composite resin. Mathematical and Computational Applications, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 89–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/280361

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. M.E. Gher, R.M. Dunlap, M.H. Anderson and L.V. Kuhl, Clinical survey of fractured teeth, Journal of the American Dental Association 114, 174-177, 1987. 2.W.S. Eakle, E.H. Maxwell and B.V. Braly, Fractures of posterior teeth in adults,Journal of the American Dental Association 112, 215-218,1986. 3.R.B. Joynt, G. Weizkowski, R. Klockowski and E.L. Davis, Effects of composite restorations on resistance to cuspal fracture in posterior teeth, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 57, 431-435, 1987. 4.D.C. Reel and R.J. Mitchell, Fracture resistance of teeth restored with class II composite restorations, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 61, 177-180, 1989. 5.F.J.T. Burke, Tooth fracture in vivo and in vitro, Journal of Dentistry 20, 131-139,1992. 6.M. Toparli, N. Gokay and T. Aksoy, Analysis of a restored maxillary second premolar tooth by using three-dimensional finite element method, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 26, 157-164, 1999. 7.D. Arola, L.A. Galles and M.F. Sarubin, A comparison of the mechanical behavior of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations, Journal of Dentistry 29, 63-73,2001. 8.C.L. Lin, C.H. Chang and C.C Ko, Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto-mesh finite element approach, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 28, 51'6- 2001. 9.M.M. Ash, Wheeler's Atlas of Tooth Form, W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1984. 10.M. Toparli and T. Aksoy, Fracture toughness determination of composite resin and dentin/composite resin adhesive interfaces by laboratory testing and finite elements models, Dental Materials 14, 287-293, 1998. 11.J.S. Rees and P.H. Jacobsen, The effect of cuspal flexure on a buccal Class V restoration: a finite element study, Journal of Dentistr, 26, 361-367, 1998. 12.Y.C. Pao, R.A. Reinhardt and R.F. Krejci, Root stress with tapered-end post design in periodontally compromised teeth, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 57, 281-287,1987.