SavedAdd your journal

Journals / MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Analyzing The Relationships Between Supportive Organizational Climate, Job Involvement And Individual Adaptive Performance

Destekleyici Örgüt İklimi, İşe Bağlılık ve Bireysel Uyum Performansı Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi

Çağlar DOĞRU
Pages
2696–2713
Publication Date
2019-07-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained, supportive organizational climate has positive relationships with job involvement and individual adaptive performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this article, the relationships between supportive organizational climate, job involvement and individual adaptive performance are analyzed on the theoretical basis of norm of reciprocity, psychological contracts theory and organizational support theory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to reveal how job involvement and individual adaptive performance are affected when the organization is supportive by worrying about employees‘ welfare, maintaining better work conditions, listening to their problems, caring their wants and needs and rewarding their achievements.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained, supportive organizational climate has positive relationships with job involvement and individual adaptive performance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Örgüt iklimi · Destekleyici örgüt iklimi · İşe bağlılık

Abstract

In this article, the relationships between supportive organizational climate, job involvement and individual adaptive performance are analyzed on the theoretical basis of norm of reciprocity, psychological contracts theory and organizational support theory. The aim of this study is to reveal how job involvement and individual adaptive performance are affected when the organization is supportive by worrying about employees‘ welfare, maintaining better work conditions, listening to their problems, caring their wants and needs and rewarding their achievements. In order to achieve this, data was collected from 246 employees working in two different companies, operating in heavy commercial vehicles industry. According to the results obtained, supportive organizational climate has positive relationships with job involvement and individual adaptive performance. When there is a supportive organizational climate, employees are more involved in their jobs and adapt to changing working conditions by developing themselves.

Özet

Bu makalede, karşılıklılık normu, psikolojik sözleşme kuramı ve örgütsel destek kuramı temelinde, destekleyici örgüt iklimi, işe bağlılık ve bireysel uyum performansı arasındaki ilişkiler incelenmektedir. Araştırmanın amacı, örgütlerin çalışanlarının esenliğini düşünmesi, onların daha iyi şartlarda çalışmasını sağlaması, sorunları ile ilgilenmesi, istek ve ihtiyaçlarını önemsemesi ve başarılarını ödüllendirmesi gibi destekleyici olması halinde onların işe bağlılıklarının ve bireysel uyum performanslarının nasıl etkilendiğinin ortaya koyulmasıdır. Bu amaca ulaşmak maksadıyla, Ankara’da ağır ticari araçlar sektöründe faaliyet gösteren öncü iki şirketin, 246 çalışanından veri toplanmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, destekleyici örgüt iklimi, çalışanların işe bağlılıkları ve bireysel uyum performansı ile aynı yönlü ve anlamlı ilişkiye sahiptir. Destekleyici örgüt ikliminin varlığında, çalışanların işlerini sahiplenmesi ve değişen iş koşullarına ayak uydurabilmek için kendilerini geliştirerek uyum göstermeleri söz konusu olmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞRU, Ç. (2019). Analyzing The Relationships Between Supportive Organizational Climate, Job Involvement And Individual Adaptive Performance. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 2696–2713. https://ajindex.com/articles/2802

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-377.
  2. Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., & Begley, T. M. (2003). The Employment Relationships of Foreign Workers Versus Local Employees: A Field Study of Organizational Justice, Job Satisfaction, Performance, and OCB. Journal of Organizational Behavior 24(5), 561-583.
  3. Arthur, J. B. (1994). Effects of Human Resource Systems on Manufacturing Performance and Turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 670-687.
  4. Astin, A. W., & Holland, J. L. (1961). The Environmental Assessment Technique: A Way To Measure College Environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52(6), 308-316.
  5. Befort, N., & Hattrup, K. (2003). Valuing Task And Contextual Performance: Experience, Job Roles, And Ratings of The İmportance of Job Behaviors. Applied HRM Research, 8(1), 17-32.
  6. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task Performance and Contextual Performance: The Meaning for Personnel Selection Research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99-109.
  7. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. M. (1993). Expanding The Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance. İçinde N. Schmitt Ve W. C. Borman (Ed.) Personnel Selection in Organizations, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 71-98.
  8. Brown, S. P. (1996). A Meta-Analysis and Review Of Organizational Research on Job İnvolvement. Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), 235-255.
  9. Brown, S. P., & Leigh, T. W. (1996). A New Look at Psychological Climate and Its Relationship to Job Involvement, Effort, and Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 358-368.
  10. Campbell, J. J., Dunnette, M. D., Lawler, E. E., & Weick, K. E. (1970).
  11. Managerial Behavior, Performance, and Effectiveness. New York: Mcgraw-Hill. Chan, D. (2000). Understanding Adaptation to Changes in The Work Environment: Integrating Individual Difference and Learning Perspectives. Research in Personnel And Human Resources Management, 18, 1-42. Charbonnier‐Voirin, A., & Roussel, P. (2012). Adaptive Performance: A New Scale To Measure Individual Performance in Organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De l'Administration, 29(3), 280-293.
  12. Charbonnier-Voirin, A., El Akremi, A., & Vandenberghe, C. (2010). A Multilevel Model of Transformational Leadership and Adaptive Performance and The Moderating Role of Climate For Innovation. Group & Organization Management, 35(6), 699-726.
  13. Chughtai, A. A. (2008). Impact Of Job In