Journals / Mathematical and Computational Applications / 2008 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Two-stage group sequential designs for comparative clinical trials

Pages
31–40
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, their efficiency regarding fixed sample size design has been calculated and the results have been discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Group sequential designs are widely used in Phase II clinical trials, which are usually undertaken to evaluate the response probability of specific treatment regimen.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In most randomized clinical trials with sequential patient entry, fixed sample size design is unjustified on ethical grounds and sequential designs are often impractical.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, their efficiency regarding fixed sample size design has been calculated and the results have been discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Group sequential designs are widely used in Phase II clinical trials, which are usually undertaken to evaluate the response probability of specific treatment regimen. In most randomized clinical trials with sequential patient entry, fixed sample size design is unjustified on ethical grounds and sequential designs are often impractical. However group sequential designs are generally more practical and they provide much of the saving possible from sequential designs. Optimal restricted two-stage design is the simplest form of a group sequential design. In this study, group sequential design obtained by $\alpha^{\ast} (t)$ functions characterized using the type-I error probability and optimal restricted two stage design has been compared for the cases that the group sizes are equal. Furthermore, their efficiency regarding fixed sample size design has been calculated and the results have been discussed.

🔖

Cite This Article

BACANLI, S., PEKER, Ö. K., DEMİRHAN, Y. P. (2008). Two-stage group sequential designs for comparative clinical trials. Mathematical and Computational Applications, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 31–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/280058

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. K. Kim, D.L. DeMets, Sample size determination for sequential clinical trials with immediate response, Statistics in Medicine, 11, 1391-1399,1992
  2. S.J. Pocock, Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trials,Biometrika, 64, 191-199, 1977
  3. P.C.O’Brien, T.R.Fleming, A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics, 35, 549-556, 1979
  4. P. Armitage, Sequential medical trials, 2nd ed. Blackwell/Oxford, 1975
  5. D.L. DeMets, J.H. Ware, Group sequential methods for clinical trials with a onesided hypothesis, Biometrika, 67, 651-60, 1980
  6. D.L. DeMets, J.H. Ware, Asycmetric group sequential boundaries for monitoring clinical trial, Biometrika, 69, 661-663, 1982
  7. C.Jennison, Efficient group sequential test with unpredictable group sizes, Biometrika, 74 155-65, 1987
  8. J.D. Eales, C. Jennison, An improved method for deriving optimal one-sided group sequential tests, Biometrika, 79, 13-24,1992
  9. S. Barber, C. Jennison, Optimal asymmetric one-sided group sequential tests, Biometrika, 89, 49-60, 2002
  10. C, Jennison, B.W. Turnbull, Group Sequential Methods with Application Clinical Trials, Chapman and Hall/ Boca Raton, 2000
  11. S.S., Emerson, T.R., Fleming, Symmetric group sequential test design, Biometrics,45, 905-23, 1989
  12. S. Pampallona, A. A. Tsiatis.Group sequential designs for one-sided and twosided hypothesis testing with provision for early stopping in favour of the null hypothesis, J.Statist Plan.Infer 42, 19-35, 1994
  13. K.K.G.Lan, D.L. DeMets, Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials, Biometrika, 70, 659-663, 1982
  14. K. Kim, D.L. DeMets, Design and analysis of group sequential tests based on type-1 error spending rate function, Biometrika, 74,149-154, 1987
  15. D.B. Owen, A double sample test procedure, Ann. Math. Stat, 24, 449-457, 1953
  16. A. Hald, Optimum double sampling tests of given strength, The normal distribution, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 70, 451-456, 1975
  17. T. Calton, K. McPherson, Two-stage plans compared with fixed-sample size and Wald SPRT plans, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 71, 80-86, 1976
  18. C. DeWith, Two-stage plans for the testing of binomial parameters, Contr. Clin.Trials, 4, 215-226, 1983
  19. L.D. Case, T.M. Morgan, C.E. Davis, Optimal restricted two-stage designs, Contr. Clin.Trials, 8, 146-156, 1987
  20. D.M. Reboussin, D.L. DeMets, K. Kim, K.K.G. Lan, Programs for computing group sequential bounds using the Lan-Demets Method, Technical Report, 60, University of Wisconsin