SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4

Implementation of The Fuzzy Dematel Method in Higher Education Course Selection: The Case of Eskişehir Vocational School

Serpil ALTINIRMAK
Mustafa ERGÜN
Çağlar KARAMAŞA
Pages
1597–1614
Publication Date
2017-12-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, a general review of criteria has also been considered but as part of a cause and effect process, by using a causal diagram.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz Elective courses play an essential role in the process of improving students’ skills and also help with identifying their interests, talents and potentials for a given field or vocation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Given this aim, a survey was designed and applied to 50 student respondents from different departments (marketing, hospitality management, secretary and office management, foreign trade, culinary arts, real estate and property management) current at Eskişehir Vocational School.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, a general review of criteria has also been considered but as part of a cause and effect process, by using a causal diagram.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Course Selection · Vocational School · Fuzzy Logic

Özet

Öz Elective courses play an essential role in the process of improving students’ skills and also help with identifying their interests, talents and potentials for a given field or vocation. Therefore the relationships between course selection criteria have been considered crucial in the decision making process. In this study, the aim has been to determine what constitutes the course selection criteria for students in Eskişehir Vocatonal School. Given this aim, a survey was designed and applied to 50 student respondents from different departments (marketing, hospitality management, secretary and office management, foreign trade, culinary arts, real estate and property management) current at Eskişehir Vocational School. Criteria, which are defined within the literature review undertaken, are ranked according to importance level via the fuzzy DEMATEL (The Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) method. In addition, a general review of criteria has also been considered but as part of a cause and effect process, by using a causal diagram.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTINIRMAK, S., ERGÜN, M., KARAMAŞA, Ç. (2017). Implementation of The Fuzzy Dematel Method in Higher Education Course Selection: The Case of Eskişehir Vocational School. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4, 1597–1614. https://ajindex.com/articles/27943

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Aksakal, E. & Dağdeviren M. (2010). ANP ve DEMATEL Yöntemleri ile Personel Seçimi Problemine Bütünleşik Bir Yaklaşım, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik, Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(4), 905-913.
  2. Babad, E., Darley J., M. & Kaplowitz H. (1999). Development Aspects in Course Selection, Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 157-168.
  3. Bai, C. & Sarkis, J. (2013). A Grey-Based DEMATEL Model for Evaluating Business Process Management Critical Success Factors, International Journal of Production Economics, 146(1), 281-292.
  4. Baykasoğlu, A., Kaplanoğlu, V., Durmuşoğlu, Z.D.U. & Şahin, C. (2013). Integrating Fuzzy DEMATEL and Fuzzy Hierarchical TOPSIS Methods for Truck Selection, Expert Systems with Applications, 40(3), 899-907.
  5. Chang, B., Chang, C.H. & Wu, C.H. (2011). Fuzzy DEMATEL Method for Developing Supplier Selection Criteria. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 1850-1858.
  6. Dalalah, D., Hayajneh, M. & Batieha, F. (2011). A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Supplier Selection, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(7), 8384-8391.
  7. Demir, A. (1996). Üniversitedeki Seçmeli Ders Uygulamasının Öğrenciler ve Öğretim Üyelerince Değerlendirilmesi, Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 2(7), 24-31.
  8. Demir, A. & Ok, A. (1996). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesindeki Öğretim Üye ve Öğrencilerinin Seçmeli Dersler Hakkındaki Görüşleri, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12, 121-125.
  9. Dubois, D. & Prade, H. (1978).
  10. Operations on Fuzzy Number, International Journal of Systems Science, 9, 613-626.
  11. Dündar, S. (2008). Ders Seçiminde Analitik Hiyerarşi Proses Uygulaması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2), 217-226.
  12. Ersöz, F., Kabak M. & Yılmaz Z., (2011). Lisansüstü Öğrenimde Ders Seçimine Yönelik Bir Model Önerisi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 13(2), 227-244.
  13. Ertuğrul, İ. & Karakaşoğlu, N. (2009). Performance Evaluation of Turkish Cement Firms with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS Methods, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 702-715.
  14. Fontela, E. & Gabus, A. (1974).
  15. DEMATEL, Innovative Methods. Report No.2 Structural Analysis of the World Problematique, Battelle Geneva Research Institute, 67-69.
  16. Gharakhani, D. (2012). The Evaluation of Supplier Selection Criteria by Fuzzy DEMATEL Method, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(4), 3215- 3224. Hung, Y., Chou, S.T. & Tzeng, G. (2006). Using a Fuzzy Group Decision ApproachKnowledge Management Adoption, APRU Distance Learni