SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Medical Network Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor / 2002 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 6

Our results of Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy

Milligan-Morgan hemoroidektomi sonuçlarımız

M. Tahir ORUÇ
Bahadır KÜLAH
Arife Polat DÜZGÜN
Selim HATİPOĞLU
M. Vasfi ÖZER
FARUK COŞKUN
Pages
714–716
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: Consequently, Milligan -Morgan hemorrhoidectomy is a technique that can be employed easily with a short operative time and that has high successful rate, less serious complication.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: This study was carried out to evaluate our clinics' experience to hemorrhoids comparing with the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 293 patients who underwent operation between 1994 and 2000 years in the third surgical clinic of Numune Teaching and Training Hospital, are evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: Consequently, Milligan -Morgan hemorrhoidectomy is a technique that can be employed easily with a short operative time and that has high successful rate, less serious complication.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Hemoroidler · Cerrahi işlemler · operatif

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was carried out to evaluate our clinics' experience to hemorrhoids comparing with the literature. Hemorrhoids are widespread pathology that are seen most in general surgical practice. Conservative surgical methods are used commonly in first and second degree hemorrhoids. Hemorrhoidectomy is indicated in third, fourth degree hemorrhoids and bleeding hemorrhoids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 293 patients who underwent operation between 1994 and 2000 years in the third surgical clinic of Numune Teaching and Training Hospital, are evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Out of 293, 196 were men (%66.9), 97 woman (%33.1) and mean age was 43.9. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy method was employed in 270 patients (%92.1), Milligan-Morgan+Reclus in 15 (%5.1), Reclus in 6 (%2.1) and Whitehead in 1 (%0.6). Mean operative time was 25 minutes and hospital stay 3 days for Milligan-Morgan method. While early complications (hemorrhage, urinary retention) were seen in 15 patients, late complications (Anal mucosal ectropion, anal stenosis) in four. We had no recurrent disease . CONCLUSION: Consequently, Milligan -Morgan hemorrhoidectomy is a technique that can be employed easily with a short operative time and that has high successful rate, less serious complication.

Özet

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmada kliniğimizin Milligan-Morgan hemoroidektomi sonuçları değerlendirilmiştir. Hemoroid genel cerrahinin yaygın hastalıklarından biridir. 1. ve 2. derece hemoroidlerde konservatif tedavi yöntemleri genellikle yeterli olabilirken 3. ve 4. derece hemoroidler ve kanamalı hemoroidlerde çoğunlukla hemoroidektomi endikasyonu doğmaktadır. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Bu çalışmada, 1994-2000 yılları arasında Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 3. Cerrahi Kliniği'nde opere edilen 293 vaka retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. BULGULAR: 293 hastanın 196' sı erkek (%66.9), 97' si (%33.1) kadındı, ortalama yaş 43.9 idi. Bu hastaların 270'ine (%92.1) Milligan-Morgan hemoroidektomi, 15 olguya (%5.1) Milligan-Morgan+Reclus, 6 olguya (%2.1) Reclus, 1 olguya da (%0.6) Whitehead tekniği uygulandı. Milligan-Morgan yöntemi için ortalama ameliyat süresi 25 dakika, hastanede kalış süresi 3 gündü. 15 hastada erken komplikasyon (hemoraji, üriner retansiyon), 4 hastada geç komplikasyon (mukozal ektropion, anal stenoz) oluştu, nüks görülmedi. SONUÇ: Milligan-Morgan hemoroidektomi tekniği; kolay uygulanan, kısa süreli, başarı oranı yüksek, ciddi komplikasyonları az olan bir operasyondur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ORUÇ, M. T., KÜLAH, B., DÜZGÜN, A. P., HATİPOĞLU, S., ÖZER, M. V., COŞKUN, F. (2002). Our results of Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. Medical Network Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 6, 714–716. https://ajindex.com/articles/279171

References (12)

  1. Loder PB, Kamm MA, Nichols RJ, Phillips KS. Haemorrhoids: pathology, pathophysiology and aetiology. Br J Surg 1994; 81:946-54.
  2. Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation. An epidemiologic study. Gastroenterology 1990; 98:380-6. Arullani A. Diagnosis and current treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Augiology 1994; 45:560-5.
  3. MacRae HM, McLeod RS. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities. Can J Surg 1995; 38:687-94. Keighley RB. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. Saunders Comp 1993:295-363.
  4. Ünal AR, Özer MV. Günlük pratikte hemoroidler. Ank Num Hast Deıg 1983; 24:107-28.
  5. Hooker GD, Plewes EA. Local injection of bupivacaine after rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42:174-9.
  6. Konsten J, Baeten MI. Hemorrhoidectomy vs. Lord's method. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43:503-6.
  7. Arbman G, Krook H, Haapaniemi S. Closed vs. open hemorrhoidectomy.Is there any difference? Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43:31-4. Pescatori M. Closed hemorrhoidectomy. Ann Chir 1995; 66:787-90.
  8. Sunar H, Akıncı M, Tunberg F. Yüksek anal kanal basınçlı hastalarda internal hemoroidlerin tedavisinde lateral internal sfinkterotomi. Kolon Rektum Hast Derg 1995; 5:140-3.
  9. Kluiber RM, Wolff BG. Evaluation of anemia caused by hemorrhoidal bleeding. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37:1006-7. Goligher J. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. London, Bailliere Tindall 1984:93-135.
  10. Hunt L, Luck AJ, Rudkin G, Hewett PJ. Day case hemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 1999; 86:255-8.
  11. Hoff SD, Bailey R, Butts DR. Ambulatory surgical hemorrhoidectomy- a solution to postoperative retention. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37:1242-4.
  12. Bella F, Giordano M. Hemorrhoidectomy. Milligan and Morgan technique. Ann Chir 1995; 66:791-9.