SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Medical Network Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor / 2003 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Mode of delivery and fetal distress in 40 completed weeks of gestational age

40. gestasyonel haftasını tamamlamış gebelerde doğum şekli ve fetal distres oranları

Gamze S. ÇAĞLAR
Filiz A. AVŞAR
Pages
203–205
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The high rate of fetal distress and cesarean birth in 40 completed weeks of gestational age is challenging.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the mode of delivery and fetal distress rates in 40 completed weeks of gestational age.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 2884 patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The high rate of fetal distress and cesarean birth in 40 completed weeks of gestational age is challenging.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sezaryen · Gebelik yaşı · Fetal distres

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the mode of delivery and fetal distress rates in 40 completed weeks of gestational age. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 2884 patients. Maternal age, gravidity, parity, gestational age at birth, mode of delivery, fetal birth weights were analyzed. Result: 75% of the patients were at 40 completed weeks of gestational age, 20% were at 41 completed weeks of gestational age, 4.85% were at 42 completed weeks of gestational age. In the analysis of maternal ages, 38% of the patients were in the 21-25 years old group and the mean maternal age at birth was 24. 41.2% of the patients were primigravid, 46.6% of the patients were nullipar. In the evaluation of the modes of delivery, vaginal birth rate was 74% and cesarean section rate was 25.8%. Among the cesarean births, the rate of fetal distress indication was 32%. The highest rate of birth weight was 42% with 3000-3500 gr. group. Conclusion: Cesarean birth rate was similar but fetal distress rate was higher than the literature. The high rate of fetal distress and cesarean birth in 40 completed weeks of gestational age is challenging.

Özet

Amaç: 40. gestasyonel haftasını tamamlamış gebelerde doğum şekli ve fetal distres oranlarını inceleyerek artmış riski öngörmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: 40. gestasyonel haftasını doldurmuş 2884 gebe çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Hastaların maternal yaş, gravida, parite, doğumda gestasyonel yaş, fetusların doğum şekli ve doğum ağırlıkları incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Hastaların %75'i 40. gebelik haftasını, %20'si 41. gebelik haftasını, %4.8'i 42. gebelik haftasını tamamlamıştır. Maternal yaşlar incelendiğinde hastaların %38'i 21-25 yaş grubunda olup, ortalama maternal yaş 24 dür. Hastaların %41.2'si primigravid, %46.6'sı nullipardır. Doğum şekilleri incelendiğinde, vajinal doğum oranı %74, sezaryen oranı %25.8 olarak tesbit edilmiştir. Sezaryen ile doğumlarda fetal distres endikasyonu %32 olarak bulunmuştur. Doğum ağırlık dağılımı incelendiğinde, en yüksek oranda (%42) 3000-3500 gr. fetus doğumu olmuştur. Sonuç: 40. gestasyonel haftadan sonra sezaryen ile doğum oranı literatürü destekler orandadır. Fetal distres oranı ise literatürdekinden yüksek bulunmuştur. 40. gestasyonel haftasını tamamlamış gebelerde yüksek fetal distres ve sezaryen oranları dikkat çekicidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAĞLAR, G. S., AVŞAR, F. A. (2003). Mode of delivery and fetal distress in 40 completed weeks of gestational age. Medical Network Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 203–205. https://ajindex.com/articles/278498

References (8)

  1. Sjöstdt S, Engleson G, Rooth G. Dismaturity. Arch Dis Child 1958; 33:123. Sachs BP, Friedman EA. Results of an epidomiologic study of postdate pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1986; 31:162-6.
  2. Hamburg R, Ludomirski A, Insler V. Detection of fetal risk in postmaturity. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1979; 86:759-64.
  3. Scheider JM, Olson RW, Cüret LB. Screening for fetal and neonatal risk in postdate pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 131:473-8.
  4. Grausz JP, Heimler R. Asphyxia and gestational age. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 62:175-9.
  5. Kramer MS, Mclean FH, Boyd ME, Usher RH. The validity of gestational age estimation by menstrual dating in term, preterm and posttrem gestations. JAMA 1988; 260:3306-8. NICHHD Network of Maternal Fetal Medicine Units. A clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in post- term pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:716-23. Arias F. Predictibility of complications associated with prolon­ gation of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70:101-6.
  6. Freeman RK, Garite TJ, Modonlou H, Dorchester W, Rom- mal C, Devonoy M. Postdate pregnancy: Utilization of contrac­ tion stress test for primary fetal surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 140:128-35.
  7. Eden RD, Gergely RZ, Schifrin BS, Wade ME. Comparison of antepartum testing schemes for the management of the post­ date pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144:683-92. Dyson DC. Fetal surveillance v.s. labor induction at 42 weeks in postterm gestation. J of Reprod Med 1988; 33:262-70.
  8. Usher RH, Mclean FH. Intrauterin growth of live born Cauca­ sian infants of sea level. J Pediatr 1969; 74:901-10.