SavedAdd your journal

Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Cervical Priming with Hydroscopic Dilatator Before Hysteroscopy: Effect on Pain Scores and Ease of the Procedure

Aslı Yarcı GÜRSOY
Mine KİSELİ
Gamze S. ÇAĞLAR
Perihan EKMEKÇİ
Hakan YILMAZ
Recai PABUÇCU
Sevim DİNÇER CENGİZ
Pages
149–151
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The authors aimed to determine whether preoperative cervical preparation with Aquacryl hydrogel before hysteroscopy has any favorable effects eitherfor the patient (pain scores) or for the surgeon (ease of the procedure)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Aquacryl hydrogel is one of the cervical dilatators which is a synthetic rigid hydroscopicgel rod, indicated to be used for cervical preparation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:OBJECTIVE: Aquacryl hydrogel is one of the cervical dilatators which is a synthetic rigid hydroscopicgel rod, indicated to be used for cervical preparation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The authors aimed to determine whether preoperative cervical preparation with Aquacryl hydrogel before hysteroscopy has any favorable effects eitherfor the patient (pain scores) or for the surgeon (ease of the procedure)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Aquacryl hydrogel is one of the cervical dilatators which is a synthetic rigid hydroscopicgel rod, indicated to be used for cervical preparation. The authors aimed to determine whether preoperative cervical preparation with Aquacryl hydrogel before hysteroscopy has any favorable effects eitherfor the patient (pain scores) or for the surgeon (ease of the procedure)

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRSOY, A. Y., KİSELİ, M., ÇAĞLAR, G. S., EKMEKÇİ, P., YILMAZ, H., PABUÇCU, R., CENGİZ, S. D. (2016). Cervical Priming with Hydroscopic Dilatator Before Hysteroscopy: Effect on Pain Scores and Ease of the Procedure. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 149–151. https://ajindex.com/articles/192607

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Chen FC, Bergann A, Krosse J, Merholz A, David M. Isosorbide mononitrate vaginal gel versus misoprostol vaginal gel versus Dilapan-S for cervical ripening before first trimester curettage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;138(2):176-9. Lichtenberg ES. Complications of osmotic dilators. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2004;59(7):528-36. http://www.dilapan.com/en/indications
  2. McCord ML, Stovall TG, Summitt RL Jr, Lipscomb GH, Collins KW, Parsons LH. Synthetic hygroscopic cervical dilator use in patients with unsatisfactory colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85(1):30-2.
  3. Di Spiezio Sardo A, Guida M, Pellicano M, Nappi C, Bettocchi S. New technique to perform hysteroscopy in 'women with an intact hymen' is really just the vaginoscopic approach (no-touch technique). J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006;13(5):489-90.
  4. Xu D, Zhang X, He J.A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Intramuscular Phloroglucinol Versus Oral Misoprostol for Cervix Pretreatment Before Diagnostic Hysteroscopy. Int Surg 2015;100(7-8):1207-11.
  5. Inal HA, Ozturk Inal ZH, Tonguc E, Var T. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripen- ing before diagnostic hysteroscopy in nulliparous women. Fertil Steril 2015;103(5):1326-31.
  6. Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kang H, Choi CH, Lee JW, Kim BG et al. The use of misoprostol before hysteroscopic surgery in non-pregnant premenopausal women: a randomized com- parison of sublingual, oral and vaginal administrations. Hum Reprod 2010;25(8):1942-8.
  7. Cooper NA, Smith P, Khan KS, Clark TJ. Does cervical preparation before outpatient hysteroscopy reduce women's pain experience? A systematic review. BJOG 2011;118(11):1292-301.