SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Medical Network Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor / 2004 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

Congential anomaly screening among 2785 school-age children in Zonguldak city

Zonguldak ili merkezinde 2785 ilköğretim çağı öğrencisinin konjenital anomali taraması

Orhan BABUCÇU
Mübin HOŞNUTER
Eksal KARGI
Berfu BABUCÇU
Ahmet IŞIKDEMİR
Cem PAYASLI
Bülent TEKEREKOĞLU
Pages
424–427
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The prevalence rate of some congenital anomalies in our study was higher when compared with those reported in the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Screening of congenital anomalies not only estimates the incidence of anomalies but also guides in the determining of the causative factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: In this study, prevalence of the congenital anomalies was estimated using data obtained from screening of 2785 school-age children.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The prevalence rate of some congenital anomalies in our study was higher when compared with those reported in the literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Doğumsal · kalıtsal ve yenidoğan hastalıkları ve anormallikleri · Türkiye

Abstract

Objective: Screening of congenital anomalies not only estimates the incidence of anomalies but also guides in the determining of the causative factors. Material and Method: In this study, prevalence of the congenital anomalies was estimated using data obtained from screening of 2785 school-age children. Schools were chosen randomly in such way that every socio-economical class were presented in the study. Results: 14 types of congenital anomalies were detected, with prevalence rates: Accessory nipple 31.9/1000, pectus carinatum 10.4/1000, pectus excavatum 1.7/1000, cylinodactyly 25.1/1000, syndactyly 3.9/1000, polydactyly 7/1000, hemangioma 2.1/1000, melanocytic nevus 38.7/1000, malocclusion 41.2/1000, prominent ear 14.7/1000, epicanthal fold 6.4/1000, microtia 0.7/1000, hypospadias 5/1000. Conclusion: The prevalence rate of some congenital anomalies in our study was higher when compared with those reported in the literature.

Özet

Amaç: Konjenital anomali taramaları, anomalilerin sıklığını ortaya koymakla beraber nedenlerinin saptanmasında da yol göstericidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamızda 2785 ilkokul çağındaki öğrenci üzerinde yapılan tarama sonucunda elde edilen veriler yardımıyla konjenital anomalilerin prevalansları hesaplandı. Yapılan bu kesitsel araştırmada okullar her sosyoekonomik gruptan olmak üzere rasgele örnekleme yöntemi ile seçildi. Bulgular: Çalışma sonucunda 14 farklı konjenital anomali tanımlandı. Prevalans hızları: aksesuar meme 31.9/1000, pektus karinatus 10.4/1000, pektus ekskavatum 1.7/1000, klinodaktili 25.1/1000, sindaktili 3.9/1000, polidaktili 7/1000, hemanjiom 2.1/1000, melanositik nevus 38.7/1000, maloklüzyon 41.2/1000, kepçe kulak 14.7/1000, epikantal kıvrım, 6.4/1000, mikrotia 0.7/1000, hipospadias 5/1000 olarak saptandı. Sonuç: Araştırmamızda saptanan anomalilerin prevalanslarının literatürde rapor edilenden anomaliler ile karşılaştırıldı ve bazılarının daha yüksek olduğu görüldü.

🔖

Cite This Article

BABUCÇU, O., HOŞNUTER, M., KARGI, E., BABUCÇU, B., IŞIKDEMİR, A., PAYASLI, C., TEKEREKOĞLU, B. (2004). Congential anomaly screening among 2785 school-age children in Zonguldak city. Medical Network Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 424–427. https://ajindex.com/articles/278445

References (14)

  1. Jones KL. Smith's recognizable patterns of human lalformation. 5th edition. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders fompany, 1997. Feingold M. Congenital malformations. In: Avery GB, 'etcher MA, MacDonald MG, eds. Neonatology. Philadelphia, B Lipincott Co. 1994:744-63. Jones KL. Dysmorphology. In: Behrman RE, Kliegman RM, win AM, eds. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics, Philadelphia, V-B. Saunders co. 1996:473-6.
  2. Yücesan S, Dindar H, Olcay I, et al. Prevalence of congenital abnormalities in Turkish school children. Eur J Epidemiol. 1993;:373-80. Shamberger RC. Congenital chest wall deformities. Curr Probl Surg, 1996; 33:469-542.
  3. Mielke CH, Winter RB. Pectus carinatum successfully treated with bracing A case report. Int Orthop, 1993; 17:350-2.
  4. Lorenz S, Maier C, Segerer H, Landthaler M, Hohenleyther U. Skin changes in n.ewbbrn infants in the first 5 days of life, tautarzt. 2000; 51:396-400.
  5. Karvonen SL, Vaajalahti P, Marenk M, Janas M, Kuokkanen K. Birthmarks in 4346 Finnish newboms. Acta Derm Venereol. 1992; 72:55-7.
  6. Jojart G, Seres E. Polythelia and renal malformation. Orv Hetil. 1992; 133:1755-6.
  7. Jojart G, Seres E. Supernumary nipples and renal anomalies. Int Urol Nephrol. 1994; 26:141-4.
  8. Mastroiacovo P, Corchia C, Botto LD, Lanni R, Zampino G, Fus- co D. Epidemiology and genetics of microtis-anotia: a registry based study on over one million births. J Med Genet. 1995; 32:453-7.
  9. Netscher DT, Scheker LR. Timing and decision-making in the treatment of congenital upper extremity deformities. Clin PlastSurg 1990; 17:113-31. Manske PR. Subclassification of polydactyly. Br J Plast Surg 1996; 49:137. Eaton CJ, Lister GD. Syndactyly. Hand Clin. 1990; 6:555-75.
  10. Lee Y, Lee E, Park WJ. Anchor epicanthoplasty combined with out-fold type double eyelid plasty for Asians: do we have to make an additional scar to correct the Asian epicanthal fold? Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105:1872-80.
  11. Pierik FH, Burdorf A, Nijman JM, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama SM, Juttmann RE, Weber RF. A high hypospadias rate in The Netherlands. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17:1112-5.
  12. Shields LM, Wiese WH, Skipper BJ, Charley B, Benally L. Navajo birth outcomes in the Shiprock uranium mining area. Health Phys. 1992; 63:542-51.
  13. Swansburg EO, Fairchild WL, Fryer BJ, Ciborowski JJ. Mouthpart deformities and community composition of Chironomi- dae (Diptera) larvae downstream of metal mines in New Brunswick, Canada. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2002; 21:2675-84.
  14. Martinez EA, Moore BC, Schaumloffel J, Dasgupta N. The potential association bet