Journals / Meme Sağlığı Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Sonographic acoustic shadowing in benign breast lesions

Memenin benign lezyonlarında sonografik arka akustik gölgelenme bulgusu

Pages
19–25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To remember the benign lesion types this shows acoustic shadowing may help to evaluate the radiology-pathology accordance after biopsy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE: To review the benign breast lesions that show posterior acoustic shadowing on ultrasound examination.
📊
Key Findings & Data:RESULTS: Frequencies of the benign lesions were fibrodenoma 32% (29), sclerosing adenosis 24% (22), fat necrosis 18.5% (17), focal fibrosis 9% (8), radial scar 8% (7), normal breast tissue 5.5% (5), and diabetic mastopathy 3% (3) respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To remember the benign lesion types this shows acoustic shadowing may help to evaluate the radiology-pathology accordance after biopsy.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biyopsi · Meme hastalıkları · Tanısal görüntüleme

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review the benign breast lesions that show posterior acoustic shadowing on ultrasound examination. MATERIALS and METHODS: Biopsy performed benign breast lesions with sonographic acoustic shadowing were reviewed retrospectively. Frequencies of lesions were calculated on the basis of histological type. RESULTS: Frequencies of the benign lesions were fibrodenoma 32% (29), sclerosing adenosis 24% (22), fat necrosis 18.5% (17), focal fibrosis 9% (8), radial scar 8% (7), normal breast tissue 5.5% (5), and diabetic mastopathy 3% (3) respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study, most frequent benign lesions with acoustic shadowing were fibroadenomas and sclerosing adenosis. Acoustic shadowing is a suspicious ultrasound finding that commonly associates malignancy. To remember the benign lesion types this shows acoustic shadowing may help to evaluate the radiology-pathology accordance after biopsy.

Özet

AMAÇ: Hastanemizde biyopsi ile benign tanı almış, sonografik arka akustik gölgelenme bulgusu olan meme lezyonlarını gözden geçirmek. GEREÇ ve YÖNTEM: Ultrasonda arka akustik gölgelenme bulgusu olan ve biyopsi ile benign tanı alan olguların mamografi ve ultrason bulguları geri dönük olarak tekrar değerlendirildi. Lezyonların histopatolojik tipe göre sıklığı hesaplandı. BULGULAR: Biyopsi sonrası benign tanı alan toplam 91 olguda histopatolojik tanılar sıklık sırasına göre fibroadenom (29) %32, sklerozan adenozis (22) %24, yağ nekrozu (17) %18.5, fokal fibrozis (8) %9, radyal skar (7) %8, normal meme dokusu (5) %5.5 ve diabetik mastopati (3) %3 idi. TARTIŞMA: Bu çalışmada, ultrasonda arka akustik gölgelenme saptanan en sık benign lezyonlar fibroadenom ve sklerozan adenozisdi. Akustik gölgelenme maligniteyle birlikteliği olan, kuşkulu bir ultrason bulgusudur. Akustik gölgelenmenin görülebileceği benign lezyon tiplerini anımsamak biyopsi sonrası radyoloji-patoloji uyumunu değerlendirmeyi kolaylaştırabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞKIN, F., ÜNSAL, A., METEOĞLU, İ., AKDİLLİ, A. (2007). Sonographic acoustic shadowing in benign breast lesions. Meme Sağlığı Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 19–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/278220

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Stavros AT. Breast ultrasound. 1st ed. PA, USA. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. 2004:445-528
  2. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196:123-134. PMID: 7784555
  3. Kopans D. Breast imaging. 2nd ed. Philedelphia; PA. Lippincott-Raven 1998:511-615
  4. Rahbar G, Sie AC, Hansen GC ve ark. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US diff erentiation. Radiology 1999; 213:889-894. PMID: 10580971
  5. Tavassoli FA. Benign lesions. Pathology of the breast. 2nd ed. New York, NY. Appleton & Lange; 1999:115-204
  6. Weinstein SP, Conant EF, Mies C, Acs G, Lee S, Sehgal C. Posterior acoustic shadowing in benign breast lesions: sonographic-pathologic correlation. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23:73-83. PMID: 14756356
  7. Nielsen NS, Nielsen BB. Mammographic features of sclerosing adenosis presenting as a tumour. Clin Radiol 1986; 37: 371-373. PMID: 3731702
  8. Günhan-Bilgen I, Memiº A, Üstün EE, Özdemir N, Erhan Y. Sclerosing adenosis: mammographic and ultrasonographic findings with clinical and histopathological correlation. Eur J Radiol 2002; 44: 232-238. PMID: 12468074
  9. Gill HK, Ioff e OB, Berg WA. When is a diagnosis of sclerosing adenosis acceptable ar core biopsy? Radiology 2003; 228:50-57. PMID: 12738875
  10. Soo MS, Kornguth PJ, Hertzberg BS. Fat necrosis of the breast: sonographic features. Radiology 1998; 206:261-9. PMID: 9423681
  11. Rosen EL, Soo MS, Bentley RC. Focal fibrosis: a common breast lesion diagnosed at imaging-guided core biopsy. AJR 1999; 173:1657-1662. PMID: 10584816
  12. Revelon G, Sherman ME, Gatewood OM, Brem RF. Focal fibrosis of the breast: imaging characteristics and histopathologic correlation. Radiology 2000; 216:255�259. PMID: 10887257
  13. Alleva DQ, Smetherman DH, Cederbom GJ. Radial scar of the breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation in 22 cases. Radiographics 1999; 19:27-35. PMID: 10517441
  14. Cohen MA, Sferlazza SJ. Role of sonography in evaluation of radial scars of the breast. AJR 2000; 174:1075-1078. PMID: 10749253
  15. Sabate JM, Clotet M, Gomez A, De las Heras P, Torrubia S, Salinas T. Radiologic evaluation of uncommon infl ammatory and reactive breast disorders. Radiographics 2005; 25:411-424. PMID: 15798059
  16. Feder JM, de Paredes ES, Hogge JP, Wilken JJ. Unusual breast lesions: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 1999; 19:11-26. PMID: 10517440
  17. Baker JA, Soo MS, Ro