Journals / Meme Sağlığı Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Long term results of surgical treatment for breast cancer

Meme kanseri cerrahi tedavisinin uzun dönem sonuçları

Pages
89–95
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The association of clinico-pathological features and treatment modalities with overall survival, disease free survival and local recurrences were investigated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: Although many clinical data regarding breast cancer treatment have already been reported in the literature, few clinical data with long term follow up results have been reported from Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: We reviewed the records of 1841 patients with stage I and II invasive breast cancer who underwent mastectomy or breast conserving surgery (BCS) at our institution between January 1989 and January 2005.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The association of clinico-pathological features and treatment modalities with overall survival, disease free survival and local recurrences were investigated.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Neoplazm nüksü · lokal · Meme neoplazmları

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although many clinical data regarding breast cancer treatment have already been reported in the literature, few clinical data with long term follow up results have been reported from Turkey. The objective of the current study is to determine the long term results of surgical treatment in early stage breast cancer. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 1841 patients with stage I and II invasive breast cancer who underwent mastectomy or breast conserving surgery (BCS) at our institution between January 1989 and January 2005. The association of clinico-pathological features and treatment modalities with overall survival, disease free survival and local recurrences were investigated. RESULTS: The median follow up period was 76 months (2-192 months). The mastectomy group, 1209 patients (66%), was compared with the BCS group, 632 patients (34%). Five year disease free and overall survival rates were 77% and 85% for patients with mastectomy, 78% and 86% for patients with BCS, respectively. The 5 year local recurrence rate was 4% for mastectomy group and 6% for BCS group. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that age below 40 years (p=0.02) and boost radiation therapy (p=0.03) were significant risk factors for local recurrence in BCS. CONCLUSIONS: There are no significant differences in overall or dissease free survival rates when comparing the mastectomy and BCS. In recent years, BCS has become the preffered method of treatment for many patients in our clinic. Age and use of boost radiation were important determinants of local recurrence in BCS.

Özet

GİRİŞ:. Literatürde meme kanserinin uzun dönem sonuçlarını bildiren birçok çalışma bulunmasına karşın ülkemizdeki meme kanseri tedavisinin sonuçlarını irdeleyen çok az sayıda çalışma mevcuttur. Çalışmamızın amacı, ünitemizde cerrahi tedavisi ve takipleri yapılabilen meme kanseri hastalarının sonuçlarını bildirmektir. YÖNTEM VE GEREÇLER: Ocak 1989 - Ocak 2005 tarihleri arasında, kliniğimizde ameliyatı ve ameliyat sonrası takibi yapılabilen evre I ve II meme kanseri olan 1841 hasta retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastaların klinik ve patolojik özellikleri ile genel sağkalım, hastalıksız sağkalım ve lokal nüks oranları yapılan cerrahi girişime göre karşılaştırıldı. Meme koruyucu cerrahi yapılan hastalarda lokal nüks ile ilişkili faktörler belirlendi. BULGULAR: Medyan takip süresi 76 ay (2-192) idi. Hastaların 1209'u (%66) mastektomi, 632'si (%34) meme koruyucu cerrahi (MKC) ile tedavi edildiler. Uygulanan cerrahi yönteme göre hastaların 5 yıllık sağkalım ve hastalıksız sağkalım oranları: mastektomi yapılan hastalar için %85 ve %77, MKC uygulanan hastalar için %86 ve %78 olarak bulundu. Lokal nüks oranlarının MKC grubunda daha yüksek bulunduğu saptandı (MKC için %6, mastektomi için %4). Çok değişkenli analizde meme koruyucu cerrahi yapılan hastalarda hastanın ≤40 yaş olması (p=0.02) ve boost radyoterapisinin (p=0.03) lokal nüks gelişiminde en önemli faktörler olduğu belirlendi. SONUÇLAR: Mastektomi ve MKC'nin karşılaştırıldığı çalışmamızda, genel sağkalım ve hastalıksız sağkalım oranları açısından anlamlı bir fark bulunamadı. Son yıllarda MKC'nin kliniğimizde de daha fazla tercih edilen cerrahi tedavi olduğu saptandı. Meme koruyucu cerrahi uygulanan hastalarda hasta yaşının genç olması ve boost tedavisinin uygulanmamasının lokal nüks gelişimini arttıran bağımsız faktörler olduğu belirlendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARANLIK, H., ÖZMEN, V., ASOĞLU, O., İĞCİ, A., KEÇER, M., TUZLALI, S., MÜSLÜMANOĞLU, M., ASLAY, I., TOPUZ, E. (2006). Long term results of surgical treatment for breast cancer. Meme Sağlığı Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 89–95. https://ajindex.com/articles/278217

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Veronesi U, Banfi A, Del Vecchio M, et al. Comparision of Halsted mastectomy with quadranectomy: axillary dissection and radiotherapy in early breast cancer: long term results. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1986;22:1085-1089
  2. Veronesi U, Salvadori B, Luini A, et al. Conservative treatment of early breast cancer. Long term results of 1232 cases treated with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy. Ann Surg 1990;211:250-259
  3. Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC, et al. Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute Randomized Trial. Cancer. 2003;98(4):697-702
  4. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Colloborative Group. Effects of radiotherapy and surgery in early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1444-1455
  5. Early Breast Cancer Ttrialists' Colloborative Group. Favourable and unfavourable effects on long term survival of radiotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet. 2000;355:1757-1770
  6. Singletary SE, Allred C, Ashley P, et al. Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20:3628-3636
  7. Blichert-Toft M, Rose C, Anderson JA, et al. Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: Six years of life table analysis. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1992;11:19-25
  8. Moore MP, Kine DW. Patient selection criteria for conservation surgery versus mastectomy: Memorial hospital breast service experience. World J Surg 1999;18:58-62
  9. Müslümanoğlu M, Karanlik H, Kabul E, et al. Meme kanseri cerrahisinde 16 yıllık takip sonuçları (İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Deneyimi). VIII. Ulusal Meme Hastalıkları Kongresi, S.217, S5-8, 21-24 Eylül 2005, İstanbul
  10. Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, et al. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1456-1461
  11. Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R, et al. Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1989;320:822-828
  12. Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, et al. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of Stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J