Journals / Meme Sağlığı Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Wound complications following breast cancer surgery

Meme kanseri cerrahisi sonrası yara komplikasyonları

Pages
85–88
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: Seroma was the most significant complication and predictive for wound infection and skin flap necrosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Seroma is the most significant complication after mastectomy and the objective of this study is the determination of early wound complications rate for breast cancer surgery and the risk factors predisposing to these complications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: 257 patients that had been operated with modified radical mastectomy were evaluated for seroma formation, skin flap necrosis and wound infection.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: Seroma was the most significant complication and predictive for wound infection and skin flap necrosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Risk faktörleri · Cerrahi yara enfeksiyonu · İleriye dönük çalışma

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Seroma is the most significant complication after mastectomy and the objective of this study is the determination of early wound complications rate for breast cancer surgery and the risk factors predisposing to these complications. METHODS: 257 patients that had been operated with modified radical mastectomy were evaluated for seroma formation, skin flap necrosis and wound infection. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the risk factors. RESULTS: Seroma developed in 80(31.1%) patients, wound infection and skin flap necrosis developed in 19(7.3%) and 29(11.2%) patients respectively. Obesity (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.45-8.02), peroperative blood transfusion (OR: 3.32, 95% CI: 1.45-5.48) and amount of total drainage more than 1000 ml. (OR: 7.54, 95% CI: 2.52-15.80) were significantly associated with seroma formation. The significant risk factors for flap necrosis were age older than 50 years (OR: 4.36, 95% CI: 1.80-9.72), smoking (OR: 2.94, 95%CI: 1.16-7.42) and seroma formation (OR: 2,81 95% CI: 1.12-5.20); for wound infection were prolonged operation more than 180 minutes (OR: 2.74, 95%CI: 1.06-7.16) and seroma formation (OR: 4.62, 95% CI: 1.56-11.02). CONCLUSION: Seroma was the most significant complication and predictive for wound infection and skin flap necrosis.

Özet

AMAÇ: Mastektomi sonrası en önemli komplikasyon seroma oluşumudur ve bu çalışmanın amacı meme kanseri cerrahisi sonrası erken yara komplikasyon oranını ortaya koymak ve bu komplikasyonlara neden olan risk faktörlerini belirlemektir. METOD: Modifiye radikal mastektomi uygulanan 257 hasta seroma gelişimi, cilt flebi nekrozu ve yara enfeksiyonu açısından incelenmiştir. Risk faktörlerinin tespiti için multiple logistic regression analizi kullanılmıştır. SONUÇLAR: Seroma 80 (%31.1) hastada gelişirken, yara enfeksiyonu ve cilt flebi nekrozu sırasıyla 19 (%7.3) ve 29(%11.2) hastada gelişmiştir. Şişmanlık (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.45-8.02), ameliyatta yapılan kan transfüzyonu (OR: 3.32, 95% CI: 1.45-5.48) ve toplam drenajının 1000 cc'den fazla olması seroma oluşumuyla anlamlı olarak ilişkili bulunmuştur. Flep nekrozu ile ilişkili risk faktörleri; yaşın 50'nin üzerinde olması (OR: 4.36, 95% CI: 1.80-9.72), sigara içmek (OR: 2.94, 95%CI: 1.16-7.42) ve seroma oluşumu (OR: 2.81, 95% CI: 1.12-5.20) olarak bulunmuştur. Yara enfeksiyonu ile ilişkili risk faktörleri ise; ameliyatın 180 dakikadan daha uzun sürmesi (OR: 2.74, 95%CI: 1.06-7.16) ve seroma oluşumu (OR: 4.62, 95% CI: 1.56-11.02) olarak bulunmuştur. SONUÇ: Mastektomi sonrası seroma oluşumu en önemli komplikasyondur ve yara enfeksiyonu ve cilt flebi nekrozunun gelişimine neden olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKAYA, M., KARAMAN, N., ÖZASLAN, C., KURUKAHVECİOĞLU, O., BİRCAN, H. Y., ALTINOK, M. (2006). Wound complications following breast cancer surgery. Meme Sağlığı Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 85–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/278212

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Hoefer RA, DuBois JJ, Ostrow LB, Silver LF. Wound complications following modified radical mastectomy: an analysis of perioperative factors. J Am Osteopath Assoc 1990;90:47-53. (PMID: 2312369
  2. Sorensen LT, Horby J, Friss E, Pilsgaard B, Jorgensen T. Smoking as a risk factor for wound healing and infection in breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2002;28:815-820. (PMID: 12477471
  3. Danforth DN Jr, Lippman ME, McDonald H, Bader J, Egan E, Lampert M, Steinberg SM, Swain SM. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on mastectomy for locally advanced breast cancer. Am Surg 1990;56:6-11. (PMID: 2153011
  4. Tejler G, Aspegren K. Complications and hospital stay after surgery for breast cancer: a prospective study of 385 patients. Br J Surg 1985;72:542-544. (PMID: 4016536
  5. Porter KA, O'Connor S, Rimm E, Lopez M. Electrocautery as a factor in seroma formation following mastectomy. Am J Surg 1998;176:8-11. (PMID: 9683123
  6. Vinton AL, Traverso LW, Jolly PC. Wound complications after modified radical mastectomy compared with tylectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. Am J Surg 1991;161:584-588. (PMID: 2031542
  7. Say CC, Donegan W. A biostatistical evaluation of complications from mastectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1974;138:370-376. (PMID: 4811322
  8. Hayes JA, Bryan RM. Wound healing following mastectomy. Aust N Z J Surg 1984;54:25-27. (PMID: 6586162
  9. Kumar S, Lal B, Misra MC. Post-mastectomy seroma: a new look into the aetiology of an old problem. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1995;40:292-294. (PMID: 8523301
  10. Chen J, Gutkin Z, Bawnik J. Postoperative infections in breast surgery. J Hosp Infect 1991;17:61-65. (PMID: 1672325
  11. Rotstein C, Ferguson R, Cummings KM, Piedmonte MR, Lucey J, Banish A. Determinants of clean surgical wound infections for breast procedures at an oncology center. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:207-214. (PMID: 1593101
  12. Bonnema J, van Geel AN, Ligtenstein DA, Schmitz PI, Wiggers T. A prospective randomized trial of high versus low vacuum drainage after axillary dissection for breast cancer. Am J Surg 1997;173:76-79. (PMID: 9074367
  13. Bryant M, Baum M. Postoperative seroma following mastectomy and axillary dissection. Br J Surg 1987;74:1187. (PMID: 3427377
  14. Petrek JA, Peters MM, Nori S, Knauer C, Kinne DW, Ropatko A. Axillary Lymphadenectomy. A prospective, randomized trial of 13 factors influencing drainage, including early or delayed arm mobilization. Arch Surg 1990;125:378-382. (PMID: 2407228
  15. Parikh HK, Badwe RA,