Journals / Meme Sağlığı Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Innovation efforts in breast tumor classification

Meme tümör sınıflamasında yenilik çabaları

Pages
187–190
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review discusses some of the limitations of current TNM system and gene expression-based molecular classification of breast cancer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The tumor-node-metastasis system is a cancer classification system that is used around the world as a common language to classify anatomic disease extent in tumours.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This system has served oncologists well for more than 50 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review discusses some of the limitations of current TNM system and gene expression-based molecular classification of breast cancer.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Neoplazmların histolojik tipleri · Meme neoplazmları · Neoplazm evrelendirilmesi

Abstract

The tumor-node-metastasis system is a cancer classification system that is used around the world as a common language to classify anatomic disease extent in tumours. The aims of the TNM staging system were to aid the clinician in planning treatment, to give some indication of prognosis, to assist in the evaluation of the results of the treatment, to facilitate the exchange of information between treatment centres and to contribute to the continuing investigation of human cancer. This system has served oncologists well for more than 50 years. But now questions are being asked about its usefulness in the 21st century. This review discusses some of the limitations of current TNM system and gene expression-based molecular classification of breast cancer.

Özet

Tümör-nod-metastaz sistemi, tümörlerin anatomik kapsamını açıklayan ve tüm dünyada ortak bir dil olarak kullanılan kanser sınıflama sistemidir. Bu sistem, tedavi planında, tedavi sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesinde klinisyenlere yardım etmeyi, prognozun bazı işaretlerini vermeyi, tedavi merkezleri arasında bilgi paylaşımını kolaylaştırmayı ve kanser araştırmalarının devamına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlar. Onkologlara 50 yıldan uzun bir süredir hizmet vermektedir. Ancak şimdi 21. yüzyılda yararlılıkları sorgulanmaktadır. Bu inceleme ile geçerli tümör-nod-metastaz sisteminin sınırlılıkları ve meme kanserinin gen ekspresyonuna dayalı moleküler sınıflaması incelenecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAVUŞOĞLU, A. Ç., SAYDAM, S., CANDA, T., SAKIZLI, M. (2009). Innovation efforts in breast tumor classification. Meme Sağlığı Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 187–190. https://ajindex.com/articles/278144

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Singletary SE, Connolly JL. Breast cancer staging: working with the sixth edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:37-47. (PMID: 16449185
  2. Haagensen CD. Diseases of the Breast. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1956
  3. Denoix PF. Nomenclature classification des cancers [in French]. Bull Inst Nat Hyg (Paris) 1952;7: 743–8
  4. International Union Against Cancer. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. Geneva, Switzerland: International Union Against Cancer; 1968
  5. Beahrs OH, Carr DT, Rubin P, eds. Manual for Staging of Cancer. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1977
  6. Hermanek P, Gospodarowicz MK, Henson DE, et al. International Union Against Cancer (UICC): Prognostic Factors in Cancer. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1995
  7. Gospodarowicz MK, Henson DE, Hutter RV, et al. Prognostic Factors in Cancer. 2nd ed. New York, NY:Wiley-Liss; 2001
  8. Gospodarowicz MK, O'Sullivan B, Sobin LH. Prognostic Factors in Cancer. 3rd ed. New York, NY:Wiley; 2006
  9. Greene FL,Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2002
  10. Sobin LH,Wittekind C. International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM Classification Of Malignant Tumors. 6th ed. New York, NY:Wiley- Liss; 2002
  11. Greene FL, Sobin LH. The staging of cancer: a retrospective and prospective appraisal. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:180-90. (PMID: 18460593
  12. Burke HB. Outcome prediction and the future of the TNM staging system. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:463-4. (PMID: 15467022
  13. TNM Online. Available at: http://www3.inter science.wiley.com/cgibin/ mrwhome/104554799/ HOME. Accessed February 6, 2009
  14. Veronesia U, Vialeb G, Rotmensza N, Goldhirscha A Rethinking TNM: Breast cancer TNM classification for treatment decision-making and research The Breast 2006;15: 3–8. (PMID: 16473737
  15. Baratelli MG ‘‘Rethinking'' the modifications of TNM classification of breast cancer, proposed by Veronesi et al. The Breast 2007;16:109. (PMID: 17291756
  16. Pusztai L, Mazouni C,Anderson K,Wu Y, Symmans WF Molecular Classification of Breast Cancer: Limitations and Potential The Oncologist 2006;11:868–77. (PMID: 16951390
  17. Galea MH, Blamey RW, Elston CE, Ellis IO. The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1992;22:207-19. (PMID: 1391987
  18. Ravdin PM, Siminoff LA, Davis GJ, Mercer MB, Hewlett J, Gerson N, Parker HL. Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer. J