Journals / Meme Sağlığı Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Breast ultrasound findings in patients with mastalgia under the age of fourty

Kırk yaş altında mastalji yakınması olan olgularda meme ultrasonografi bulguları

Pages
19–22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Prospective larger series are needed to be done and the endications of the breast ultrasound in this cases are needed to be discussed on this subject.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the breast Ultrasound (US) findings in patients with mastalgia under the age of fourty.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The breast US findings and BI-RADS (Breast imaging reporting and data system) categories of patients with mastalgia and asymptomatic cases refered to the Rize Education and Research Hospital, Early Diagnosis of Cancer Screening and Education Center between January 2008-December 2008 were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Prospective larger series are needed to be done and the endications of the breast ultrasound in this cases are needed to be discussed on this subject.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the breast Ultrasound (US) findings in patients with mastalgia under the age of fourty. Materials and Methods: The breast US findings and BI-RADS (Breast imaging reporting and data system) categories of patients with mastalgia and asymptomatic cases refered to the Rize Education and Research Hospital, Early Diagnosis of Cancer Screening and Education Center between January 2008-December 2008 were evaluated retrospectively. Histories of the family breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy, side of the breast with mastalgia, and findings of the physical examinations were evaluated. Results: Both groups had 23 (%15,4 & %18,7) sonographically pathological findings and there was no statistically significantly difference between them (p = 0.475). US findings and BI-RADS (Breast imaging reporting ans data system) categories were also not statistically significanltly different in both groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: US findings and BI-RADS categories do not show statistically significance between the patients with and without mastalgia under the age of fourty . Prospective larger series are needed to be done and the endications of the breast ultrasound in this cases are needed to be discussed on this subject.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada amacımız kırk yaş altında mastalji yakınması olan hastalarda ultrasonografi (US) bulgularının sunulmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2008 -Aralık 2008 tarihleri arasında Rize Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi KETEM ünitesine (Kanser Erken Teşhis Tarama ve Eğitim Merkezi) mastalji yakınması bulunan kırk yaş altındaki 149 olgunun ve mastalji yakınması olmayan 123 kontrol olgusunun meme US bulguları geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. Tüm olguların aile öyküleri, hormon kullanım öyküleri ile mastalji olan meme yönü ve fizik muayene bulguları kaydedildi. Bulgular: US incelemeleri karşılaştırıldığında her iki grupta 23 olguda (%15,4 & %18,7) bulgu mevcuttu ve aradaki fark anlamlı değildi (p=0,475). İki grup arasında US bulguları ve BI-RADS kategorileri karşılaştırıldığında istatistiksel anlamlı farklılık saptanmadı (p > 0.05). Sonuç: Kırk yaş altında mastalji yakınması olan ve olmayan olgularda US bulguları ve BI-RADS kategorileri istatistiksel anlamlı farklılık göstermemektedir. Bu konuda ileriye dönük ve daha çok olgu içeren çalışmalar yapılmalı ve US endikasyonları tartışılmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜKSEKKAYA, R., ÇELİKYAY, F., VOYVODA, N., YAZAR, Ö. G. (2012). Breast ultrasound findings in patients with mastalgia under the age of fourty. Meme Sağlığı Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 19–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/278093

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Parlati E, Travaglini A, Liberale I, Menini E, Dell’Acqua S. Hormonal profile in benign breast disease: endocrine status of cyclical mastalgia patients. J Endocrinol Invest 1998; 11: 679-83. (PMID: 2975693
  2. Smith RL, Pruthi S, Fitzpatrick LA. Evaluation and Management of Breast Pain. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79: 353-372. (PMID: 15008609
  3. Preece PE, Baum M, Mansel RE, Webster DJ, Gravelle IH, Hughes LE Importance of mastalgia in operable breast cancer Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982; 284: 1299. (PMID: 6803948
  4. Morrow M. Management of common breast disorders: breast pain. In: Harris JR, et al. eds. Breast diseases. 2d ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1991: 63-71
  5. Leung JW, Kornguth PJ, Gotway MB.Utility of targeted sonography in the evaluation of focal breast pain. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21(5): 521- 6; quiz 528-9. (PMID: 12008815
  6. Ohuchi N, Ishida T, Kawai M, Narikawa Y, Yamamoto S, Sobue T. Randomized Controlled Trial on Effectiveness of Ultrasonography Screening for Breast Cancer in Women Aged 40–49 (J-START): Research Design. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2011; 41(2):275-277. (PMID: 21131295
  7. Uchida K, Yamashita A, Kawasw K, Kamiya K.Screening ultrasonography revealed 15% of mammographically occult breast cancers. Breast Cancer 2008; 15:165-168. (PMID: 18224382
  8. Smallwood J, Ah-Kye D, Taylor I. Vitamin B6 in the treatment of premenstrual mastalgia. Br J Clin Pract 1986; 40: 532-533. (PMID: 3307864
  9. Duijim LEM,Guit GL, Hendriks JHCL, Zaat JOM, Mali WPTM. Value of breast imaging in women with painful breasts: observational follw up study. British Med J 1998; 317: 1492-1495. (PMID: 9831579
  10. Locker AP, Manhire AR, Stickland V, Caseldine J, Blamey RW. Mammography in symptomatic breast disease. Lancet 1989; i: 887- 889. (PMID: 2564959
  11. Lumachi F, Ermani M, Brandes AA, Boccagni P, Basso SM, Favia G, D’Amico DF. Breast complaints and risk of breast cancer. Populationbased study of 2,879 self-selected women and long-term follow-up. Biomed Pharmacother 2002; 56(2): 88-92. (PMID: 12000140
  12. Stern EE. Age-related breast diagnosis. Can J Surg 1992; 35: 41-45. (PMID: 1739898
  13. Barbieri R, Buechler E, Coley C et al. In: Hoffman J (ed). CRICO/RMF Breast Care Manegement Algoritm. Improving Breast Patient Safety 2010: p 6
  14. Tumyan L, Hoyt AC, Basset LW. Negative Predictive Value of Sonography and Mammography in Patients with Focal Breast Pain. Breast J 2005; 11: 333-337. (PMID: 16174154
  15. Tabar I, Pentek Z, Dean PB.The diagnostic and therapeutic valu