Journals / Meme Sağlığı Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Kütahyalı kadınlarda meme kanseri sıklığının ve risk faktörlerinin belirlenmesi: 2010-2011 yılı tarama sonuçları

Determination of breast cancer incidence and risk factors in women in kutahya province: The results of screening for the year 2010–2011

Pages
130–134
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is recommended that risk groups should be observed and it is essen- tial that screening in accordance with age level should be performed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, the aim was to investigate the risk factors of women applying to an Early-Diagnosis, Screening and Education Center for Cancer (KE- TEM) for breast cancer screening.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In the study, whose scope is descriptive, the screening results of the women applying to Kütahya KETEM for breast cancer screening in between the years of 2010-2012 were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is recommended that risk groups should be observed and it is essen- tial that screening in accordance with age level should be performed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, the aim was to investigate the risk factors of women applying to an Early-Diagnosis, Screening and Education Center for Cancer (KE- TEM) for breast cancer screening. Materials and Methods: In the study, whose scope is descriptive, the screening results of the women applying to Kütahya KETEM for breast cancer screening in between the years of 2010-2012 were evaluated. All participants were given &#8220;The Risk Assessment Form for Breast Cancer&#8217; to complete, which is suggested by the Ministry of Health to assess the risk of breast cancer. Data was obtained from Kütahya KETEM. The data were analysed with SPSS 15.0 statistical soft- ware, and relationships between the variables were evaluated by chi-square test. Results: As a result of the analysis, 16 (0.39%) women, whose diagnosis was proven by histopathological examination, were diagnosed with breast cancer. The mean age of the16 women diagnosed with breast cancer was 51.44±7.25. Of these, 31.25% had a family history of breast cancer. In terms of risk factors affecting breast cancer, being 50 years of age and older, having a first pregnan- cy at the age of 18 or over and a duration of breastfeeding under 12 months were all higher among the women diagnosed with breast cancer than among the women not diagnosed with breast cancer (p<0.05). Conclusion: By screening at KETEM breast cancer can be diagnosed at earlier stages. It is recommended that risk groups should be observed and it is essen- tial that screening in accordance with age level should be performed.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada meme kanseri taraması için Kanser Erken Teşhis, Tarama ve Eğitim Merkezi’ne (KETEM) başvuran kadınların risk faktörlerinin incelen- mesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem ve Gereçler: Tanımlayıcı tipte olan bu çalışma kapsamında Kütahya KETEM’e 2010-2011 yılları arasında meme kanseri taraması için başvuran 4012 kadının tarama sonuçları değerlendirildi. Olgulara Sağlık Bakanlığının “Meme Kanseri Risk Değerlendirme Formu uygulandı. Veriler Kütahya KETEM’in kayıt- larından elde edilmiştir. Araştırmanın verileri SPSS 15.0 istatistik programı ile analiz edilmiş ve değişkenler arasındaki ilişki Ki-kare testi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: İnceleme sonucunda histopatolojik inceleme ile kanıtlanmış 16 (%0,39) kadına meme kanseri teşhisi konulmuştur. Meme kanseri teşhisi ko- nan 16 kadının yaş ortalaması 51,44±7,25’dir. Hastaların %31,25’inin ailesinde meme kanseri öyküsü bulunmaktadır. Meme kanserini etkileyen risk faktörleri açısından yaşı 50 ve üstü olma, İlk gebelik yaşının 18 ve üstü olması, emzirme süresinin 12 ayın altında olması durumlarının meme kanseri tanısı almayanla- ra göre anlamlı düzeyde daha fazla olduğu tespit edilmiştir (p<0,05). Sonuç: KETEM’de yapılan taramalar ile meme kanserleri daha erken evrede teşhis edilebilmektedir. Risk gruplarının gözlenmesi ve yaşa göre uygun tara- maların yapılması önerilmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

KUNT, H., BİLGE, R. S. (2013). Kütahyalı kadınlarda meme kanseri sıklığının ve risk faktörlerinin belirlenmesi: 2010-2011 yılı tarama sonuçları. Meme Sağlığı Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 130–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/278076

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Stewart SL, King JB, Thompson TD, Friedman C, Wingo PA. Cancer mortality surveillance-United States, 1990-2000. MMWR Surveill Summ 2004; 53: 1-108. (PMID: 15179359
  2. Jemal A, Thomas A, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2002; 52: 23-47. (PMID: 11814064) [CrossRef] 3. Özmen V. Breast canser in the world and Turkey. J Breast Healt 2008; 4: 7-12
  3. Sant M, Francisci S, Capocaccia R, Verdecchia A, Allemani C, Berrino F. Time trends of breast cancer survival in Europe in relation to incidence and mortality. Int J Cancer 2006; 119: 2417-22. (PMID: 16964611) [CrossRef] 5. Onat H, Başaran M. Meme kanseri risk faktörleri ve koruma. Topuz E, Aydıner A, Dinçer M (Ed). Meme Kanseri (90-107). İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri 1. Baskı, 2003
  4. Dumitrescu RG, Cotarla I. Understanding breast cancer risk - where do we stand in 2005? J Cell Mol Med 2005; 9: 208-21. (PMID: 15784178) [CrossRef] 7. Özmen V, Fidaner C, Aksaz E, Bayol Ü, Dede İ, Göker E, et al. Türkiye’de Meme Kanseri Erken Tanı Ve Tarama Programlarının Hazırlanması “Sağlık Bakanlığı Meme Kanseri Erken Tanı Ve Tarama Alt Kurulu Raporu” J Breast Healt 2009; 5: 125-34
  5. Bjurstam N, Björneld L, Warwick J, Sala E, Duffy SW, Nyström L, et al. The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial. Cancer 2003; 97: 2387-96. (PMID: 12733136)[CrossRef] 9. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Vitak B, Yen MF, Warwick J, Smith RA, et al. The Swedish Two-County Trial of mammographic screening: cluster randomisation and end point evaluation. Ann Oncol 2003; 14: 1196- 8. (PMID: 12881376) [CrossRef] 10. Tabar L,Yen MF, Vitak B, Chen HH, Smith RA, Duffy SW. Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet 2003; 361: 1405-10. (PMID: 12727392) [CrossRef] 11. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ, American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2113. CA Cancer J Clin 2003; 53: 27-43. (PMID: 12568442
  6. Clavel-Chapelon F, Gerber M. Reproductive factors and breast cancer risk. Do they differ according to age at diagnosis? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002; 72: 107-15. (PMID: 12038701
  7. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2001; 51: 87-8. (PMID: 11577484
  8. Romieu I, Hernandez- Avila M, Lazcano E, Lopez L, Romero- Jaime R. Breast cancer and lactation history in Mexican women. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 143: 543-52. (PMID: 8610671) [CrossRef] 15. Lipworth L, Ba