Journals / Meme Sağlığı Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

Meme Kanseri Nedeni ile Mastektomi Yapılmış Hastalarda Cerrahi Tedavinin Yaşam Kalitesi Üzerine Olan Etkileri

Impact of Surgery Type on Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients

Pages
222–228
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the decision-making process, quality of life should be taken into consideration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Breast cancer can lead to alterations in quality of life of the patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 250 female patients (breast-preserving surgery (BPS), n=27, 11%; modified radical mastectomy (MRM), n=194, 77%, and simple mastectomy (SM), n=29; 11%) aged between 28-55 years (47.4±6.4 yrs) were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the decision-making process, quality of life should be taken into consideration.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Breast cancer can lead to alterations in quality of life of the patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the changes in quality of life of the female patients who had undergone surgical treatment for breast cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 250 female patients (breast-preserving surgery (BPS), n=27, 11%; modified radical mastectomy (MRM), n=194, 77%, and simple mastectomy (SM), n=29; 11%) aged between 28-55 years (47.4±6.4 yrs) were included in the study. Patient information, demographic characteristics, income, and treatment modalities applied were recorded. Validated Turkish versions of EORTC QLQ-C30, and EORTC– BR23 questionnaires were used for all patients. Results: Breast-preserving surgery has a more favorable impact on general well-being, physical role, cognitive, psychological, and social functions, and symptom scale scores. When the identical parameters were taken into consideration, relatively favorable outcomes of BPS on the patients were observed relative to mastectomized patients. Besides, though not statistically significant, BPS has more patient-friendly effects on sexual function and sexual satisfaction in comparison with mastectomy. Patients with advanced stage disease and elder patients had more unfavorable health related quality of life (HRQoL) scores than younger patients, and those in their early stages of breast cancer. Conclusion: Quality of life of BPS patients is less adversely affected relative to mastectomized patients. In the decision-making process, quality of life should be taken into consideration.

Özet

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<Amaç: Meme kanseri yaşam kalitesi değişikliklerine yol açabilir. Bu çalış- manın amacı meme kanseri nedeni ile cerrahi tedavi yapılmış kadın hastalarda cerrahi tedavi sonrası yaşam kalitesi değişikliklerinin değerlendirilmesidir. Yöntem ve Gereçler: Çalışmaya 28-55 (47.4±6.4) yaş arası 250 kadın hasta (meme koruyucu cerrahi (MKC) yapılan 27 hasta (%11), modifiye radikal mastektomi (MRM) yapılan 194 hasta (%77) ve basit mastektomi (BM) yapılan 29 hasta (%12)) dahil edildi. Hastalara ait demografik, gelir düzeyleri ve tedavi bilgileri kaydedildi. Hastalara Türkçe EORTC QLQ-C30 ve -BR23 anketleri uygulandı. Bulgular: Genel iyilik hali, fiziksel-rol-bilişsel-ruhsal-sosyal fonksiyonlar ve semptom ölçeklerinde MKC yapılanların mastektomi yapılanlara göre daha olumlu etkilendiği gözlendi. MKC yapılan hastaların aynı parametreler dikkate alındığında mastektomi yapılan hastalara göre daha olumlu etkilendikleri gözlendi. MKC istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmasa da cinsel fonksiyon ve cinsel doyum parametreleri göz önüne alındığında mastektomiye göre göre daha olumlu etkilere sahipti. İleri evre hastalığı olanlar erken evre hastalara göre, genç yaş grubundaki hastalar ileri yaştakilere göre daha olumsuz yaşam kalitesi göstergelerine sahiplerdi. Sonuç: Meme koruyucu cerrahi yapılan hastalarda mastektomi yapılanlara göre yaşam kalitesi daha az olumsuz etkilenmektedir. Tedavi yöntemlerine karar verilirken hastanın yaşam kalitesi değişiklikleri dikkate alınmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKÇA, M., ATA, A., NAYIR, E., ERDOĞDU, S., ARICAN, A. (2014). Meme Kanseri Nedeni ile Mastektomi Yapılmış Hastalarda Cerrahi Tedavinin Yaşam Kalitesi Üzerine Olan Etkileri. Meme Sağlığı Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 222–228. https://ajindex.com/articles/278054

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Harold JB, Jay RH, Monica M. Malignant Tumors Of The Breast. DeVita, Hellman, And Rosenberg’s: Cancer; Principles & Practice of Oncology. 8th Ed. Vol: Two, Philadelphia 2008; pp1606-1654. De Marquiegui A, Huish M. A womans’s sexual life after an operation. BMJ 1999; 318:178-181. (PMID: 9888917) [CrossRef] Gregory D, Johnston R, Pratt G, Watts M, Whatmore S. “Quality of Life”. Dictionary of Human Geography (5th ed. June 2009) Oxford: WileyBlackwell. 4. Garratt A, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ 2002; 324:1417. [CrossRef] Babacan A. Meme kanserinde psikososyal sorunlar ve destekleyici girişimler. Meme Sağlığı Dergisi 2006; 2:129-135.
  2. Neil W Scott, Peter M Fayers, Neil K Aaronson, Andrew, Bottomley, Alexander de Graeff, Mogens Groenvold, Chad Gundy, Michael Koller, Morten A Petersen, Mirjam AG Sprangers on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values. http:// groups.eortc.be/qol/eortc-qlq-c30. http://www.proqolid.org/instruments/eortc_quality_of_life_questionnaire_breast_cancer_module_eortc_qlq_br23
  3. Demirci S, Eser E, Ozsaran Z, Tankisi D, Aras AB, Ozaydemir G, Anacak Y. Validation of the Turkish versions of EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 modules in breast cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2011; 12:1283-1287. (PMID: 21875283) Bozkurt B, Sülü B, Ünal B, Koçer B, Yıldırım O, Karabeyoğlu M, ve ark. Erken evre meme kanserli hastaların SF-36 ile yasam kalitesinin değerlendirilmesi: Ameliyat Tipi Yasam Kalitesini Etkiliyor mu? Klinikler&Doktor Dergisi 2004; 10:286-291.
  4. Güzelant A, Göksel T, Ozkok S, Tasbakan S, Aysan T, Bottomley A. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer C-30: An examination into the cultural validity and reliability of Turkish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Eur J Cancer Care 2004, 13:135-144. (PMID: 15115469) [CrossRef] Dubashi B, Vidhubala E, Cyriac S, Sagar TG. Quality of life among younger women with breast cancer: study from a tertiary cancer institute in south India. Indian J Cancer 2010; 47:142-147. (PMID: 20448376) [CrossRef] Salonen P, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Tarkka MT, Koivisto AM, Kaunonen M. Changes in quality of life in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Nurs 2011; 20:255-266. (PMID: 21108675) [CrossRef] Lee TS, Kilbreath SL, Refshauge KM, Pendlebury SC, Beith JM, Lee MJ. Quality of life of women treated with radiotherapy for breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 2008; 16:399-405. (P