Journals / Medicine Science / 2017 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

The role of chrysin against harmful effects of formaldehyde exposure on the morphology of rat fetus liver and kidney development

Pages
73–80
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although CH is insufficient to fix the histopathological changes that occur in the liver, damaging effects that occur in the kidney decreased statistically

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was aimed to investigate possible harmful effects of formaldehyde (FA) exposure on the morphology of fetus liver and kidney development during pregnancy and also to determinate possible protective role of chrysin (CH) against these harmful effects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this aim, after pregnancy was induced, 58 female rats were divided into 6 groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although CH is insufficient to fix the histopathological changes that occur in the liver, damaging effects that occur in the kidney decreased statistically
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was aimed to investigate possible harmful effects of formaldehyde (FA) exposure on the morphology of fetus liver and kidney development during pregnancy and also to determinate possible protective role of chrysin (CH) against these harmful effects. For this aim, after pregnancy was induced, 58 female rats were divided into 6 groups. Serum physiologic (SF) was injected to the Group I rats intraperitoneally (i.p.). 20 mg/kg CH was given to the Group II via gavage. 0.1 mg/kg FA was applied to the Group III (i.p.), 1 mg/kg FA was injected to Group IV (i.p.) 0.1 mg/kg FA was given to Group V i.p., and 20 mg/kg CH was given to the same group via gavage. 1 mg/kg FA was applied to Group VI i.p., and 20 mg/kg CH was given to the same group via gavage. Fetuses were taken from each pregnant rat with cesarean section on the 20th day of the pregnancy. The morphological analyses of the fetuses, liver and kidney; biochemical and histological analyses of the liver and kidney were performed. The fetal body, liver and kidney weight of the FA groups demonstrated a statistically significant decrease the compared to control group. Also the FA-1 group were observed histopathological changes on the fetus liver and kidneys. FA exposure causes harmful effects on fetus the liver and kidneys. CH reduces the negative effect on morphological variables statistically. Although CH is insufficient to fix the histopathological changes that occur in the liver, damaging effects that occur in the kidney decreased statistically

🔖

Cite This Article

CUGLAN, S., EKİNCİ, N., YILDIZ, A., DOĞAN, Z., SAPMAZ, H. I., VARDI, N., ÖZYALIN, F., BAKİRCİ, S., ÇAY, M., KÖSE, E., TÜRKÖZ, Y., ÖZBAĞ, D. (2017). The role of chrysin against harmful effects of formaldehyde exposure on the morphology of rat fetus liver and kidney development. Medicine Science, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 73–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/277483

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Fowden AL. Growth and metabolism. In: Fetal Growth and Development. 1nd edition. Cambridge: United Kingdom at the University Press, 2001;44-70
  2. Atasü T. Gebelikte Fetusa ve Yenidoğana Zararlı Etkenler. 2inci baskı, Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, 2000;477-8
  3. Cetin E, Malas M. Fetal büyümeye etki eden çevresel faktörler. Med J SDU. 2005;12(2):65-72
  4. Sadler TW. Üçüncü ve Sekizinci Haftalar Arası: Embriyonik Dönem. Çev: Başaklar AC. Langman Medikal Embriyoloji. 11. baskıdan çeviri. Ankara: Palme Yayıncılık. 2011;67-90
  5. Hebel R, Stromberg MW. Digestive system, embryology. In: Anatomy and Embryology of the Laboratory Rat. Almanya: Biomed Verlag. 1986;46-57, 231-51
  6. Soysal H, Unur E, Duzler A, Karaca O, Ekinci N. Effects of intraperitoneal administration of the phenytoin on the skeletal system of the rat fetus. Seizure. 2011;20(3):187-93
  7. Formaldehyde. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/substances/toxsubstance.asp?toxid=39. access date 04.05.2012 8. Smith AE. Formaldehyde. Occup Med. 1992;42(2):83-8
  8. IARC: International Agency For Research On Cancer. Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Volume 88 (2006). Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and and 1-tert-Butoxy–2- propanol. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol88/mono88.pdf. access date 06.05.2012 10. Unsaldi E, Ciftci MK. Formaldehyde, usage areas, risk group, harmful effects and preventive measures.YYÜ, Journal of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine. 2010;21(1):71-5
  9. Report of the Federal Panel on formaldehyde. Environ Health Perspect. 1982;43:139-68
  10. Chapter 5.8 Formaldehyde. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/123062/AQG2n dEd_5_8Formaldehyde.pdf. access date 12.06.2012 13. Taskinen HK, Kyyronen P, Sallmen M, Virtanen SV, Liukkonen TA, Huida O, Lindbohm ML, Anttila A. Reduced fertility among female wood workers exposed to formaldehyde. Am J Indust Med. 1999;36(1):206-12
  11. Duong A, Steinmaus C, McHale CM, Vaughan CP, Zhang L. Reproductive and developmental toxicity of formaldehyde: A systematic review. Mutat Res. 2011;728(3):118-38
  12. Maroziene L, Grazuleviciene R. Maternal exposure to low-level air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study. Environ Health. 2002;1(1):6
  13. Collins JJ, Ness R, Tyl RW, Krivanek N, Esmen NA, Hall TA. A review of adverse pregnancy outcomes and formaldehyde exposure in human and animal studies. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2001;34(1):17- 34
  14. Dulskiene V, Grazuleviciene R. Environmental risk factors and outdoo