Journals / Medicine Science / 2017 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Fluoroscopy improves femoral stem placement in cementless total hip arthroplasty

Pages
264–269
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The use of fluoroscopy while rasping the femoral canal leads to proper alignment and press fitting of the stem and provides the opportunity to intraoperatively correct malpositionings of the stem

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fluoroscopy is routinely used in trauma cases to evaluate alignment and reduction quality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Because conventional templating has a high mismatch rate, we sought to explore whether we could use intraoperative fluoroscopy while implanting the femoral stem.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The use of fluoroscopy while rasping the femoral canal leads to proper alignment and press fitting of the stem and provides the opportunity to intraoperatively correct malpositionings of the stem
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Fluoroscopy is routinely used in trauma cases to evaluate alignment and reduction quality. Because conventional templating has a high mismatch rate, we sought to explore whether we could use intraoperative fluoroscopy while implanting the femoral stem. Sixty patients with Croft 3-4 coxarthrosis were included in this study. No preoperative templating was performed in either of the two groups. The final conformations of the stem sizes and positions were achieved freehand intraoperatively using anatomic landmarks. In the second group, after surgeons intraoperatively agreed on the final stem size, C-arm fluoroscopy images are obtained with the last rasp size before the stem implantation. The alignment of femoral stem according to the femoral canal, the lower leg discrepancy (LLD) and the lateral offsets were evaluated with X ray. The stem/endosteal areas at 2 cm above the trochanter minor (T+2) and 2 cm below the trochanter minor (T-2) and the deviation of the stem tip from the center of the femoral canal were evaluated in CT images. The stems that were implanted under fluoroscopic control filled the medullary cavity better at both the T+2 and T-2 levels. On fluoroscopy, in the control group, the malpositioning of the femoral stems were less, the centralizations were better, and the restorations of the lateral offset and LLD were more accurate. The use of fluoroscopy while rasping the femoral canal leads to proper alignment and press fitting of the stem and provides the opportunity to intraoperatively correct malpositionings of the stem

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇABUK, H., BÜYÜKKURT, C. D., DEDEOĞLU, S. S., İMREN, Y., TEKİN, A. Ç., GÜRBÜZ, H. (2017). Fluoroscopy improves femoral stem placement in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Medicine Science, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 264–269. https://ajindex.com/articles/277469

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Reggiani B, Cristofolini L, Taddei F, Viceconti M. Sensitivity of the primary stability of a cementless hip stem to its position and orientation. Artif Organs. 2008;32(7):555-60
  2. Fulkerson E, Koval K, Preston CF, Iesaka K, Kummer FJ, Egol KA. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures associated with cemented femoral stems: a biomechanical comparison of locked plating and conventional cable plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(2):89-93
  3. Jasty M, Bragdon C, Burke D, O'Connor D, Lowenstein J, Harris WH. In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(5):707-14
  4. Varini E, Cristofolini L, Traina F, Viceconti M, Toni A. Can the rasp be used to predict intra-operatively the primary stability that can be achieved by press-fitting the stem in cementless hip arthroplasty? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008;23(4):408-14
  5. Kannan A, Owen JR, Wayne JS, Jiranek WA. Loosely implanted cementless stems may become rotationally stable after loading. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(7):2231-6
  6. Krismer M, Biedermann R, Stöckl B, Fischer M, Bauer R, Haid C. The prediction of failure of the stem in THR by measurement of early migration using EBRA-FCA. Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse-femoral component analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81(2):273-80
  7. Ecker TM, Tannast M, Murphy SB. Computed tomography-based surgical navigation for hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:100-5
  8. Konyves A, Bannister GC. The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(2):155-7
  9. Sariali E, Mauprivez R, Khiami F, Pascal-Mousselard H, Catonné Y. Accuracy of the preoperative planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty. A randomized comparison between three-dimensional computerised planning and conventional templating. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98(2):151-8
  10. Eggli S, Pisan M, Müller ME. The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(3):382-90
  11. González Della Valle A, Slullitel G, Piccaluga F, Salvati EA. The precision and usefulness of preoperative planning for cemented and hybrid primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(1):51- 8
  12. Steinberg EL, Shasha N, Menahem A, Dekel S. Preoperative planning of total hip replacement using the TraumaCad™ system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130(12):1429-32
  13. Kitada M, Nakamura N, Iwana D, Kakimoto A, Nishii T, Sugano N. Eva