Journals / Medicine Science / 2017 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

General anesthesia management in carotid endarterectomy surgery: a single center experience

Pages
41–45
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Experience of the anesthesiologist and the surgeon as surgical anesthetic management of CEA is an important point to be noted that the current developments in the patient's characteristics and monitoring

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an effective surgery which is applied in order to reduce the risk of stroke associated with severe stenosis of the carotid artery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Age, ASA physical status, Mallampati score (MP), anesthesia and surgery duration, ICU and discharge time, blood transfusion rate, anesthetic and analgesic drugs, invasive procedures, complications, smoking, stenosis side and ratio, comorbid conditions of patients and drugs were recorded.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Experience of the anesthesiologist and the surgeon as surgical anesthetic management of CEA is an important point to be noted that the current developments in the patient's characteristics and monitoring
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an effective surgery which is applied in order to reduce the risk of stroke associated with severe stenosis of the carotid artery. Anesthesia management is important in these patients due to high incidence of cardiovascular disease and studies are in progress for ideal anesthesia management. In this study, we aimed to share our experience in carotis endarterectomy and evaluate the clinical outcomes and review retrospectively. Patients informations were obtained from the patients and anesthesia records. Age, ASA physical status, Mallampati score (MP), anesthesia and surgery duration, ICU and discharge time, blood transfusion rate, anesthetic and analgesic drugs, invasive procedures, complications, smoking, stenosis side and ratio, comorbid conditions of patients and drugs were recorded. The mean age of patients was 67.19±1.07 . It was evaluated that 44 patients (61.2%) were ASA II, 28 patients (38.8%) were ASA III. It was recorded that mean duration of anesthesia was 226.25 ± 37.99 min, duration of surgery was 195.83±38 min, ICU stay was 2.45 ± 2.52 days and hospital stay time was 5.23 ± 2.77 days. 29 of patients (40.3%) were smokers and 7 of patients (9.7%) were identified as secondary smokers. The mortality rate was 6.9% (5 patients). Clinical experience and outcome data from our study are consistent with the literature. In CEA surgery, anesthetic technique that is safe enough to guide the evidence is not there yet. Experience of the anesthesiologist and the surgeon as surgical anesthetic management of CEA is an important point to be noted that the current developments in the patient's characteristics and monitoring

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAN, A. S., AKBAŞ, S., DURAK, M. A., KAÇMAZ, O., ERSOY, M. Ö., DURMUŞ, M. (2017). General anesthesia management in carotid endarterectomy surgery: a single center experience. Medicine Science, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 41–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/277371

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. European Carotis Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: Interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet. 1991;337(8752):1235-43
  2. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Benefical effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Eng J Med. 1991;325(7):445-53
  3. Liapis CD, Bell PR, Mikhailidis D, Sivenius J, Nicolaides A, Fernandes e Fernandes J, Biasi G, Norgren L; ESVS Guidelines Collaborators. ESVS guidelines. Invasive tratment for carotid stenosis:indications, techniques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37(4):1-19
  4. Harbaugh KS, Harbaugh RE. Early discharge after carotid endarterectomy. Neurosurgery. 1995;37(2):219-25
  5. Gümüş F, Erkalp K, Şinikoğlu SN, Sevdi MS, Yektaş A, Polat A, Kayalar N, Alagöl A. Genel anestezi ile karotis endarterektomi ameliyatlarında bispektral indeks monitörizasyonunun etkinliği. GKDA Derg. 2013;19(1):31-6
  6. Watts K, Lin PH, Bush RL, Award S, MsCoy SA, Felkai D, Zhou W, Nguyen L, Guerrero Ma, Shenaq Sa, Lumsden Ab. The impact of anesthtetic modality on the outcome of carotid endaretectomy. Am J Surg. 2004;188(6):741-7
  7. GALA Trial Collaborative Group, Lewis SC, Warlow CP, Bodenham AR, Colam B, Rothwell PM, Torgerson D, Dellagrammaticas D, Horrocks M, Liapis C, Banning AP, Gough M, Gough MJ. General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicenter, randomised controlloed trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9656:2132-42
  8. Wang Q, Li YH, Wang TL, Feng H, Cai B. Prospective effect of lowdose sevoflurane inhalation and propofol anesthesia on the myocardium after carotid endarterectomy: A randomised controlled trial. Chin Med J. 2015;128(14):1862-6
  9. Allen BT, Anderson CB, Rubin BG, Thompson RW, Flye MW, Young-Beyer P, Frisella P, Sicard GA. The influence of anesthetic technique on perioperative complications after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 1994;19(5):834-42
  10. Muskett A, McGreevy J, Miller M. Detailed comprasion of regional and general anesthesia for carotid endareterectomy. Am J Surg. 1986;152(6):691-4
  11. Kasprzak PM, Altmeppen J, Angerer M, Mann S, Mackh J, Topel I. General versus locoregional anesthesia in carotid surgery: A prospective randomised trial. Vasa. 2006;35(4):232-8
  12. Forssell C, Takolander R, Bergqvist D, Johansson A, Persson NH. Local versus general anesthesia in carotid surgery: A prospective randomi