Journals / Medicine Science / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

The evaluation of the forensic reports referred to the council of forensic medicine, Yalova region, Turkey, 2014-2016

Pages
283–289
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Regional profile and database administration could be useful in decreasing or preventing the legal incidents as well as the better planning and performance of the Forensic Medicine Services.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to determine the demographic and referral-related characteristics and the conclusions of the legal reports which were referred to the Council of Forensic Medicine, Yalova.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Legal reports of cases who were referred to the Council of Forensic Medicine in Yalova from 01.01.2014 to 31.12.2016 were reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Regional profile and database administration could be useful in decreasing or preventing the legal incidents as well as the better planning and performance of the Forensic Medicine Services.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The aim of this study was to determine the demographic and referral-related characteristics and the conclusions of the legal reports which were referred to the Council of Forensic Medicine, Yalova. Legal reports of cases who were referred to the Council of Forensic Medicine in Yalova from 01.01.2014 to 31.12.2016 were reviewed. A retrospective evaluation regarding the application year, age and gender of the applicant, the referring department, the inquiry in terms with the Turkish Penal Code, whether the case was examined in person and the conclusion of the report, was performed. 398 cases (39.9%) in 2014, 454 cases (40.9%) in 2015 and 257 cases (23.2%) in 2016 were referred to the Council of Forensic Medicine in Yalova. These cases included 889 (80.2%) men and 220 (19.8%) women. For most of the cases (34%), the age range was 11-20 years. The most common referral reasons were injuries due to battery (31%) and evaluation of cases with regards to the criminal liability and the juridical capacity. Most of the reports were requested by the Office of Public Prosecutions. Physical examination was performed in 726 cases (65.5%) while 383 (34.5%) reports were written solely depending on the evaluation of documents. Male gender, young age, legal report requests for malicious wounding and needlestick and sharp object injuries were the most common characteristics of the legal reports conducted in our district in the 3 year period. Regional profile and database administration could be useful in decreasing or preventing the legal incidents as well as the better planning and performance of the Forensic Medicine Services.

🔖

Cite This Article

YENER, Z. (2018). The evaluation of the forensic reports referred to the council of forensic medicine, Yalova region, Turkey, 2014-2016. Medicine Science, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 283–289. https://ajindex.com/articles/277195

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. The constitution of the republic of Turkey. https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/anayasa/ anayasa82.htm date accessed:08/10/2017 Polat O. Adli Tıp Prosedürü, Klinik Adli Tıp
  2. Edition, Seckin Publishing, Ankara 2006. Celbis O, İscan MY. Adli Bilimler Kimlik, Yeniden yapılandırma ve ölüm, 1. Edition, Ankara, Özyurt Printing, 2016. Koc S. Adli Tıpta Rapor Hazırlama Tekniği ve Rapor Örnekleri. Ed: Soysal Z, Cakalir C. Forensic Medicine, Volume III
  3. Edition. İstanbul; İstanbul University Press and Film Center, 1999:1573-633. Fatih YM, Sunay YM. Adli rapor standardizasyonu ve adli raporlarda Görülen eksiklikler. Turkish J Surg Med Sci. 2006;2(50):28-33. Sunay YM, Serpil A. birinci basamakta adli olgu ve adli rapor düzenleme. Turkish J Family Practice. 2004;8(1):30-33. Güler C, Cobanoğlu C. Sağlık Mevzuatı. Güneş Bookstore, Ankara 1997:93101. Turkish Penalty Law. Law Number: 5237, Acceptance Date: 26/9/2004, Published at Official Gazette in: 12/10/2004, The Number of Official Gazette Which Published At: 25611 Güven FMK, Bütün C, Beyaztas FY, ark. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesine başvuran adli olguların değerlendirilmesi. Official J Adnan Menderes Univer Fac Med. 2009;10(3):23-8. Ulucay T, Ziver A, Zeyfeoglu Y, ark. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi adli tıp polikliniğine başvuran olguların değerlendirilmesi. J Forensic Med. 2006;20(2):22-9. Demirer M, Yavuz MS, Baydar ÇL, ark. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalı’na müracaat eden adli olgular
  4. National Forensic Medicine Days, Forensic Medicine Institute, Antalya, Congress Book, 2005;231-4. Karasu M, Isır AB, Aydın N, ark. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalınca 1998-2005 yılları arasında düzenlenen adli raporların değerlendirilmesi. Gaziantep Medical Journal. 2009;15(1):10-5. Ketenci HC, Kır MZ, Basbulut AZ, ark. Erzurum Adli Tıp Şube Müdürlüğü’ne müracaat eden olguların değerlendirilmesi. J Forensic Med. 2013;27(2):8793. Karanfil R, Zeren C. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalına 2009-2010 yıllarında başvuran olguların retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmesi. J Forensic Med. 2011;25(3):183-90. Yemenici S. Trakya Üniversitesi Sağlık Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezine başvuran adli nitelikli olguların ve düzenlenen adli raporların değerlendirilmesi. Edirne, Dissertation, 2014. Tıraşçı Y, Durmaz U, Altınal A, ark. Dicle Üniversitesi Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalınca 2012-2015 yılları arasında düzenlenen adli raporların