Journals / Medicine Science / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Detectability of microscopic findings of fracture healing in the early stages of the healing process at various postmortem intervals and evaluation of wound vitality

Pages
807–813
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result in our study; in bone fractures, inflammation findings, fibrin, granulation tissue and the presence of periosteal new bone formation, have indicated even in cases where advanced processes of autolysis and putrefaction or soft tissue has disappeared, it revealed significant findings in terms of vitality by histopathological examination.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In our study, it is aimed how long do the microscopic findings of fracture healing in postmortem interval can be detected and whether the detected findings can be used in differentiation of fractures occur in the period of antemortem or postmortem or not.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In our study, microscopic findings of 10 study groups included manually fractured bone samples that were created in antemortem period in New Zealand White rabbit f ibulas.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result in our study; in bone fractures, inflammation findings, fibrin, granulation tissue and the presence of periosteal new bone formation, have indicated even in cases where advanced processes of autolysis and putrefaction or soft tissue has disappeared, it revealed significant findings in terms of vitality by histopathological examination.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In our study, it is aimed how long do the microscopic findings of fracture healing in postmortem interval can be detected and whether the detected findings can be used in differentiation of fractures occur in the period of antemortem or postmortem or not. In our study, microscopic findings of 10 study groups included manually fractured bone samples that were created in antemortem period in New Zealand White rabbit f ibulas. The specimens, in a closed environment under constant temperature and humidity that exposed to 15-day process of putrefaction, microscopic signs of inflammation, f ibrin, granulation tissue and periosteal new bone formation in fracture edges were evaluated. In the control group, none of the evaluated parameters were detected microscopically. In microscopic evaluation of the study groups; fibrin was detected in the all study groups including postmortem 360th hour samples. As a result in our study; in bone fractures, inflammation findings, fibrin, granulation tissue and the presence of periosteal new bone formation, have indicated even in cases where advanced processes of autolysis and putrefaction or soft tissue has disappeared, it revealed significant findings in terms of vitality by histopathological examination.

🔖

Cite This Article

CETİN, S., DURAK, D., YALCİNKAYA, U., CETİN, E., EREN, F., EREN, B., DURAK, V. A. (2019). Detectability of microscopic findings of fracture healing in the early stages of the healing process at various postmortem intervals and evaluation of wound vitality. Medicine Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 807–813. https://ajindex.com/articles/277158

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Cecchi R. Estimating wound age: Looking into the future. Int J Legal Med. 2010;124:523-36.
  2. Kondo T, Ishida Y. Molecular pathology of wound healing. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;203:93-8.
  3. Grellner W, Vieler S, Madea B. Transforming growth factors TGFalpha and TGF-beta1 in the determination of vitality and wound age: immunohistochemical study on human skin wounds. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;1532-3:174-80.
  4. Dressler J, Busuttil A, Koch Ret al. Sequence of melanocyte migration into human scar tissue. Int J Legal Med. 2001;115:61-3.
  5. Nakajima T, Hayakawa M, Yajima D, Motani-Saitoh H, Sato Y, Kiuchi M, Ichinose M, Iwase H. Time-course changes in the expression of heme oxygenase-1 in human subcutaneous hemorrhage. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;158:157-63.
  6. Fechner G, Hauser R, Sepulchre MAet al. Immunohistochemical investigations to demonstrate vital direct traumatic damage of skeletal muscle. Int J Legal Med. 1991;104:215-9.
  7. Cattaneo C, Andreola S, Marinelli Eet al. The detection of microscopic markers of hemorrhaging and wound age on dry bone: a pilot study. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2010;31:22-6. Gunta KE. Essentials of pathophysiology. 2nd ed. USA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; Alterations in the skeletal system: trauma, infection, and developmental disorders. 2006;789-813.
  8. White TD, Folkens TA. The human bone manuel. USA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2005; 42-48. 10. Kılıçoğlu SS. Fracture healing at the level of microscopy. Journal of Ankara Medical School. 2002;55:143-50. 11. Cruess RL. Healing of bone, tendon and ligament: fractures. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Co; 1984; 147-67. 12. Brinker MR, Miller MD. Fundamentals of Orthopaedics. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 1999;1-7. 13. Jungueria Carlos L, Carnerio J, Kelley O. Bone. 8th edition. New Jersey: Appleton and Lange; 1995; 132-51. 14. Kolar P, Gaber T, Perka C, et al. Human early fracture hematoma is characterized by inflammation and hypoxia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:3118-26. 15. Taguchi K, Ogawa R, Migita M, et al. The role of bone marrow-derived cells in bone fracture repair in a green fluorescent protein chimeric mouse model. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;331:31–6. 16. Einhorn TA. The cell and molecular biology of fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:7-21. 17. Schiller AL, Teitelbaum SL. Bones and joints. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1999;1359–63. 18. Hayda RA, Brighton CT, Esterhai JL Jr. Pathophysiology of delayed healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:31-40. 19. Koç S,