Journals / Medicine Science / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Open wedge high tibial osteotomy with sliding cancellous bone in distal fragment into the osteotomy gap; 2-year follow-up results

Pages
683–687
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no difference in functional results between the groups in the two-year follow-up results of the patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) has been performed by orthopedic surgeons without filling the osteotomy gap.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There are 17 patients in each group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no difference in functional results between the groups in the two-year follow-up results of the patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) has been performed by orthopedic surgeons without filling the osteotomy gap. However, the osteotomy space dimension and fixation methods suitable for this method are still controversial. We use the metaphyseal cancellous bone of tibia distal fragment; using a special technique to slide the cancellous bone into the osteotomy gap to provide better bone healing. This study was conducted to investigate the benefits of this method in terms of bone union. This was designed as a prospective randomized controlled study. There are 17 patients in each group. Patients with an osteotomy gap of only 12 mm were included in the study in preoperative planning. The Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale was used to assess the functional status of the patients. Hip Knee ankle (HKA) angle and tibial posterior slope angle were measured during preoperative and control visits. Bone healing was assessed by trabecular and cortical continuity on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Reduced pain and recovery of functions confirmed the union. The mean union time was 14.3 ± 4.7 (12-22) weeks in the control group and 13.1 ± 3.9 (11-18) weeks in the graft sliding group (P = 0.04). In the control group, the HKA angle was 10.8 ± 2.5 ° Varus preoperatively and 2.1 ± 1.4 ° valgus at second-year control visit. In the graft sliding group, preoperative HKA angel was found 11.3 ± 1.9 ° Varus and 2.7 ± 2.1 ° valgus at second-year control visit (p> 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of Lysholm Knee Scale scores at preoperative and postoperative second-year control visits. The sliding cancellous bone of the tibial distal fragment into the osteotomy gap provided earlier bone union than the control group. There was no difference in functional results between the groups in the two-year follow-up results of the patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, A., SEVİMLİ, R. (2020). Open wedge high tibial osteotomy with sliding cancellous bone in distal fragment into the osteotomy gap; 2-year follow-up results. Medicine Science, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 683–687. https://ajindex.com/articles/277097

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Franco V, Cerullo G, Cipolla M, Gianni E, Puddu G. Osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. Curr Orthop. 2005;19:415–27
  2. Slevin O, Ayeni OR, Hinterwimmer S, et al. The role of bone void fillers in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Nov;24(11):3584-3598. Epub 2016 Aug 24. Review. Erratum in: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct 19, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:987
  3. Sim JA, Kwak JH, Yang SH, et al. Effect of weight-bearing on the alignment after open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:874-8
  4. Brosset T, Pasquier G, Migaud H, et al. Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy performed without filling the defect but with locking plate fixation (TomoFix™) and early weight-bearing: a prospective evaluation of bone union, precision, and maintenance of correction in 51 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97:705-11
  5. Amendola A, Panarella L. High tibial osteotomy for the treatment of unicompartmental arthritis of the knee. Orthop Clin NAm. 2005;36:497–504
  6. Hernigou P, Medevill D, Debeyre J, et al. Proximal tibial osteotomy with varus deformity: a ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:332–54
  7. Lash NJ, Feller JA, Batty LM, et al. Bone grafts and bone substitutes for opening-wedge osteotomies of the knee: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:720-30
  8. Amendola A, Bonasia DE. Results of high tibial osteotomy: review of the literature. Int Orthop. 2010;34:155-60
  9. El-Assal MA, Khalifa YE, Abdel-Hamid MM, et al. Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy without bone graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:961-6
  10. Fitzgibbons TC, Hawks MA, McMullen ST, et al. Bone grafting in surgery about the foot and ankle: indications and techniques. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19:112-20
  11. Boone DW. Complications of iliac crest graft and bone grafting alternatives in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Clin. 2003;8:1-14
  12. Vanryckeghem V, Vandeputte G, Heylen S, et al. Remodeling of the proximal tibia subsequent to bone graft harvest: postoperative ct study. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36:795-800
  13. Arrington ED, Smith WJ, Chambers HG, et al. Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:300-9
  14. Aryee S, Imhoff AB, Rose T, et al. Do we need synthetic osteotomy augmentation materials for opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Biomaterials. 2008,29:3497-5