Journals / Medicine Science / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

The relationship between thiol-disulfide balance and prostate cancer

Pages
779–783
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To verify the biochemical role of thiol/disulfide balance, studies need to be done by increasing the number of patients with prostate cancer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to investigatethe possible association of thiol/disulfidehomeostasiswith prostate-specific antigen levelsin prostate cancer patients and to compare the results with a normal healthy population ofa similar age group for the first time in literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Forty-twopatients (20 patientswith prostate cancer and 22 volunteers) were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To verify the biochemical role of thiol/disulfide balance, studies need to be done by increasing the number of patients with prostate cancer.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This study aimed to investigatethe possible association of thiol/disulfidehomeostasiswith prostate-specific antigen levelsin prostate cancer patients and to compare the results with a normal healthy population ofa similar age group for the first time in literature. Forty-twopatients (20 patientswith prostate cancer and 22 volunteers) were included in the study. Thiol/disulfide homeostasis tests were measured with an automated method. Albumin, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), ischemia modified albumin (IMA), total thiol (TT), native thiol (–SH), and disulfide (–S–S–) levelsand, thiol-disulfide ratios (disulfide / native thiol, disulfide/total thiol and native thiol/total thiol) were assessed to detect any differences between prostate cancer group and control group. The mean PSA value of the prostate cancer group was 2.56 ng/mL, the mean PSA value of the control group was 1.21 ng/mL, and the mean age of the prostate cancer group was 67.32 years, the mean age of control group was 60.09. Although native thiol and total thiol levels were significantly lower in patients with prostate cancer (p 0.05). In our study, we could not show thiol-disulfide values as a biochemical prognostic factor in patients with prostate cancer. We believe that serum TT, –SH, –S–S– concentrations cannot serve as a noninvasive biomarker for prostate cancer. To verify the biochemical role of thiol/disulfide balance, studies need to be done by increasing the number of patients with prostate cancer.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, A., DİLLİ, U. D., NESELİOGLU, S., EREL, Ö. (2020). The relationship between thiol-disulfide balance and prostate cancer. Medicine Science, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 779–783. https://ajindex.com/articles/277064

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Bray F, Jemal A, Grey N, et al. Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008–2030): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:790-801
  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, CA: A Cancer. J Clinic. 2017;67:7-30
  3. Ozdemir A, Erel O. Thıol-Dısulfide Balance: Could be a new marker for Thyroid Cancer? J Cancer Therap (JCT). 2018;9
  4. Akinloye O, Adaramoye O, Kareem O. Changes in antioxidant status and lipid peroxidation in Nigerian patients with prostate carcinoma. Polskıe Archıwum Medycyny Wewnętrznej (Polish Arch Intern Med). 2009;119
  5. Tatar M, Tatar F, Colorectal cancer in Turkey: current situation and challenges for the future. Eur J Health Econ. 2010;10:99–105
  6. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Europ Urol. 2017;71;618–29
  7. Akbayır S, Muşlu N. Prostate-specific antigen and derivatives in prostate cancer diagnosis. Türk Klinik Biyokimya Derg. 2016;14:189-204
  8. Vickers AJ, Savage C, O'Brien MF, et al. Systematic review of pretreatment prostate-specific antigen velocity and doubling time as predictors for Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:398–403
  9. Fi L, Yang XW, Krausz KW, et al. Modulation of Colon Cancer. Nutmeg J. Proteome Res. 2015;14:1937−46
  10. Sen CK, Packer L. Thiol homeostasis, and supplements in physical exercise. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72:653–69
  11. Horwich A, Hugosson J, de Reijke T, et al; Panel Members; European Society for Medical Oncology. Prostate cancer: ESMO Consensus conference guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:1141-62
  12. Yeniyol CO, Bozkaya G, Çavuşoglu A, et al. The relation of prostate biopsy results and ratio of free to total PSA in patients with a total PSA between 4–20 ng/mL. Internat Urol Nephrol. 2001;33:503–6
  13. Hizal M, Sendur MAN, Bilgin B, et al. Evaluation of dynamic serum thiol/ disulfide homeostasis in locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer. J Oncol Sci. 2018;4:1-4
  14. Dirican N, Dirican A, Şen O, et al. Thiol/disulfide homeostasis: a prognostic biomarker for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer? Redox Report. 2016:21
  15. Dogru A, Balkarli A, Yildirim Cetin G, et al. Thiol/disulfide homeostasis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2016;16:187–92
  16. Bektas H, Vural G, Gümüşyayla Ş, et al. Dynamic thiol-disulfide homeostasis in acute ischemic stroke patients. Acta Neurol Belgica. 2016;