Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1

Inquiring Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS) through the Lens of Students

Pages
453–470
Publication Date
2019-03-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To attain this goal, 416 freshman students, who take four different distance education oriented courses in a state university participated to our study The study adopts a descriptive research design, in which relationships of the variables as part of overall descriptions are examined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz The present study aims to depict the picture of students’ perceptions on Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) regarding several variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To attain this goal, 416 freshman students, who take four different distance education oriented courses in a state university participated to our study The study adopts a descriptive research design, in which relationships of the variables as part of overall descriptions are examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The analysis results were presented and discussed based on the relevant literature, and future recommendations were put forth for further researches and researchers.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler MOOC · distance education · online courses

Özet

Öz The present study aims to depict the picture of students’ perceptions on Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) regarding several variables. To attain this goal, 416 freshman students, who take four different distance education oriented courses in a state university participated to our study The study adopts a descriptive research design, in which relationships of the variables as part of overall descriptions are examined. The convenience sampling technique is used to reach the accessible population of the study since it is hard to reach to the entire group. The participants are asked to score on a perception questionnaire, which consists of 7 factors and 34 five-point Likert type items. The collected data is analysed through Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U Test and item-based analysis was performed to get a clear-cut picture of the data. The analysis results were presented and discussed based on the relevant literature, and future recommendations were put forth for further researches and researchers.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANER, M., ASMA, B., AKTUĞ, C. S. (2019). Inquiring Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS) through the Lens of Students. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 453–470. https://ajindex.com/articles/27704

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aboshady, O., Radwan, A., Eltaweel, A., Azzam, A., Aboelnaga, A.A., & Hashem, H., …Hassouna A. (2015). Perception and use of massive open online courses among medical students in a developing country: multicentre cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, (3)7. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2014-006804. Albó, L., Hernández-Leo, D., & Oliver, M. (2015). Blended MOOCs: university teachers’ perspective. Trends in digital education: Selected papers from EC-TEL 2015
  2. Workshops, CHANGEE, WAPLA, and HybridEd, 11-15.
  3. Aydın, C. H. (2017). Current status of the MOOC movement in the world and reaction of the Turkish higher education institutions. Open Praxis. 9(1), 59-78.
  4. Barcena, E., Read, T., Martin-Monje, E. & Castrillo, M. D. (2014). Analysing student participation in foreign language MOOCs: a case study. EMOOCs 2014: European MOOCs stakeholders’ summit. 11-17.
  5. Barış, F. M., (2015). Investigating the university students’ attitudes towards distance education: Namık Kemal University case. Sakarya University Journal of Education, (5)2 36-46.
  6. Baturay, M. H. (2015). An Overview of the World of MOOCs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 427-433.
  7. Birişçi, S. (2013). Perceptions and the views of the students toward video-based distance education. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, (1) 2, 24-40.
  8. Bozkurt, A. (2017). Türkiye’de uzaktan eğitimin dünü, bugünü ve yarını. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, (3), 2, 85-86.
  9. Bozkurt, A., Akgün-Özbek, E., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2017). Trends and patterns in Massive Open Online Courses: Review and content analysis of research on MOOCs (2008-2015). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3080
  10. Cabı, E. & Kurt Erhan, G. (2016). Students' views regarding teaching statistics with distance education. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, (5) 1. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Downes, S. (2008). Places to go: Connectivism & connective knowledge. Innovate, 5(1). Retrieved from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=668
  11. Eygü, H. and Karaman, S. (2013). A Study on the satisfaction perceptions of the distance education students. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 3(1), p.36-59.
  12. Fini, A. (2009). The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Cours