Journals / Medicine Science / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Prognostic impact of primary tumor location on survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: A single center experience

Pages
628–631
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The relationship between the primary tumor location and clinicopathological features such as; gender, family history, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, metastasectomy status, the presence of a mucinous component, RAS mutation status, and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Primary tumor location (PTL) is associated with very different outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 253 patients (203 left-sided, 50 right-sided) were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The relationship between the primary tumor location and clinicopathological features such as; gender, family history, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, metastasectomy status, the presence of a mucinous component, RAS mutation status, and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Primary tumor location (PTL) is associated with very different outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Clinical trials suggest that right side tumor location is an indicator of poor prognosis for patients with mCRC. The relationship between the primary tumor location and clinicopathological features such as; gender, family history, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, metastasectomy status, the presence of a mucinous component, RAS mutation status, and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. A total of 253 patients (203 left-sided, 50 right-sided) were included in the study. Median OS time for patients with metastatic right sided colon tumors were 19 (15.2-22.7) months, and OS for left sided colon tumors were 35 (29.5-40.4) months. The left-sided colon group’s OS time was significantly higher than the right-sided colon group (p ,1 panRAS mutant, CEA level ≥5 ng/mL and non-metastasectomy. The difference between these two groups were significantly associated with an improved OS (p <0.001). Our study suggests that tumor location is an essential prognostic factor in patients with mCRC to be independent of other prognostic factors. OS was significantly longer in the patients with left-sided mCRC than right-sided.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, T., COBAN, E., ARAZ, M., ALİYEV, A., SEKER, M., TURK, H. M. (2019). Prognostic impact of primary tumor location on survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: A single center experience. Medicine Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 628–631. https://ajindex.com/articles/277019

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Missiaglia E, Jacobs B, D’Ario G, et al. Distal and proximal colon cancers differ in terms of molecular, pathological, and clinical features. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:1995-2001
  2. Ahmed S, Johnson K, Ahmed O, et al. Advances in the management of colorectal cancer: from biology to treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:1031-42
  3. Elias D, Liberale G, Vernerey D, et al. Hepatic and extrahepatic colorectal metastases: when resectable, their localization does not matter, but their total number has a prognostic effect. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:900-9
  4. Guinney J, Dienstmann R, Wang X et al. The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat Med. 2015;21:1350-6
  5. Bendardaf R, Buhmeida A, Hilska M et al. VEGF-1 expression in colorectal cancer is associated with disease localization, stage, and long-term disease-specific survival. Anticancer Res. 2008;28:3865-70
  6. Lee GH, Malietzis G, Askari A, et al. Is right-sided colon cancer different from left-sided colorectal cancer? - A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:300-8
  7. Tejpar S, Stintzing S, Ciardiello F et al. Prognostic and predictive relevance of primary tumor location in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: retrospective analyses of the CRYSTAL and FIRE-3 trials. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:194-201
  8. Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Hitre E et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1408-17
  9. Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Láng I, et al. Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2011-9
  10. Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1065-75
  11. Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J et al. Final results from PRIME: randomized phase III study of panitumumab with FOLFOX4 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: Ann Oncol. 2014;25:1346-55
  12. Lee S. Schwartzberg, Fernando Rivera, Meinolf Karthaus, at al. PEAK: A randomized, multicenter phase II study of panitumumab plus modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, wild-type KRAS exo