Journals / Medicine Science / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of small focal liver lesions (≤ 10 mm) detected in patients with extrahepatic primary malignancy

Pages
520–525
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study shows that DWI can be useful in differentiating whether incidentally found small FLL is metastasis in patients who have extrahepatic primary malignancy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study is to assess the advantages of diffusion weighted resonance imaging (DWI) prospectively in the metastasis and benign differentiation of small (≤ 10 mm) focal liver lesions (FLL) detected in routine ultrasonography and/or computed tomography screening of patients with extrahepatic primary malignancy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 77 small FLLs (33 metastasis, 27 cyst, 17 hemangioma) of 53 patients who received DWI in addition to conventional magnetic resonance imaging were assessed by 2 independent readers prospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study shows that DWI can be useful in differentiating whether incidentally found small FLL is metastasis in patients who have extrahepatic primary malignancy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The purpose of the study is to assess the advantages of diffusion weighted resonance imaging (DWI) prospectively in the metastasis and benign differentiation of small (≤ 10 mm) focal liver lesions (FLL) detected in routine ultrasonography and/or computed tomography screening of patients with extrahepatic primary malignancy. A total of 77 small FLLs (33 metastasis, 27 cyst, 17 hemangioma) of 53 patients who received DWI in addition to conventional magnetic resonance imaging were assessed by 2 independent readers prospectively. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured for each FLL. T-test was used to assess the statistically significant difference between average ADC values in differentiating between metastasis and benign FLLs. In the metastasis and benign differentiation of small FLLs, optimum cutoff values of ADC values were found by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Average ADC values of small focal liver metastases were statistically significantly lower than those of benign FLL (p < 0.001). Small focal liver metastases were differentiated from benign FLL with 100% sensitivity and 97.1% specificity by using 1.44 x 10-3 s/mm2 cutoff ADC value. This study shows that DWI can be useful in differentiating whether incidentally found small FLL is metastasis in patients who have extrahepatic primary malignancy.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOYUCOK, A., ASLAN, K., DANACI, M., CAMLİDAG, I. (2019). Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of small focal liver lesions (≤ 10 mm) detected in patients with extrahepatic primary malignancy. Medicine Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 520–525. https://ajindex.com/articles/277015

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Khalil HI, Patterson SA, Panicek DM. Hepatic lesions deemed too small to characterize at CT: prevalence and importance in women with breast cancer. Radiol. 2005;235:872-8
  2. Holalkere NS, Sahani DV, Blake MA, et al. Characterization of small liver lesions: added role of MR after MDCT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006;30:591-6
  3. Tello R, Fenlon HM, Gagliano T, et al. Prediction rule for characterization of hepatic lesions revealed on MR imaging: estimation of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:879-84
  4. Hammerstingl R, Huppertz A, Breuer J, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid (Primovist)-enhanced MRI and spiral CT for a therapeutic strategy: comparison with intraoperative and histopathologic findings in focal liver lesions. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:457-67
  5. Sadowski EA, Bennett LK, Chan MR, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation. Radiol. 2007;243:148-57
  6. Taouli B, Koh DM. Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of the Liver. Radiology. 2010;254:47-66
  7. Diagnosis of focal liver lesions suspected of metastases by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI): systematic comparison favors free-breathing technique. Clin Imag. 2013;97-103
  8. Gourtsoyianni S, Papanikolaou N, Yarmenitis S, et al. Respiratory gated diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: value of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in the differentiation between most commonly encountered benign and malignant focal liver lesions. Eur J Radiol. 2008;18:486-92
  9. Kenis C, Deckers F, De Foer B, et al. Diagnosis of liver metastases: Can diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) be used as a stand alone sequence? Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:1016-23
  10. Xia D, Jing J, Shen H, et al. Value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images for discrimination of focal benign and malignant hepatic lesions: a meta-analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;32:130-7
  11. Koh DM, Collins DJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1622-35
  12. Yu JS, Chung JJ, Kim JH, et al. Detection of small intrahepatic metastases of hepatocellular carcinomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: comparison with conventional dynamic MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;29:985-92
  13. Kim DJ, Yu JS, Kim JH, et al. Small hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas: value of diffusion-weighted imaging compared with “washout” appearance on dynamic MRI. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:879-86
  14. Nam SJ, Yu JS, Cho ES, et al. High-flow haemangiomas versus hypervascular h