Journals / Medicine Science / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of impulsivity and complex attention functions of subjects with substance use: Sample from Adiyaman province

Pages
67–71
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Long term follow-up studies are needed to understand the reciprocal relations between substance use, impulsivity, and complex attention.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research is to compare impulsivity and complex attention functions in individuals with substance use disorders to those who do not use substance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Among them, 33 (94.3%) males and 2 females between 18-65 years of age formed the study sample.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Long term follow-up studies are needed to understand the reciprocal relations between substance use, impulsivity, and complex attention.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The aim of this research is to compare impulsivity and complex attention functions in individuals with substance use disorders to those who do not use substance. Design of this study was a case-control study. Universe of this study was patients with substance use who admitted to psychiatry department of our hospital. Among them, 33 (94.3%) males and 2 females between 18-65 years of age formed the study sample. Randomly selected 23 (92.0%) males and 2 (8%) females without any substance use disorders who were similar to the study group according to age and sex formed the control group. A statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of Barratt’s total impulsivity score, motor impulsivity, and non-plan point scores (p˂0.05). There were two statistically significant differences (p˂0.05) between two groups in terms of Trail Making Part B, Trail Making Part B / Trail Making Part A, Trail Making Part B - Trail Making Part A, Trail Making Part B + Trail Making Part A. Subjects using substances have difficulties with concentration, delaying gratification, making appropriate decisions, and inhibiting responses. Another important finding of this study was higher levels of disturbance in complex attention function in subjects with substance use. According to this result, subjects with substance use have difficulties in changing between different stimulating sets, following consecutive stimuli and mental flexibility. Long term follow-up studies are needed to understand the reciprocal relations between substance use, impulsivity, and complex attention.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUŞTEPE, A., KALENDEROĞLU, A., ÇELİK, M., BOZKURT, E. K., ÖRÜM, M. H., UĞUZ, Ş. (2019). Evaluation of impulsivity and complex attention functions of subjects with substance use: Sample from Adiyaman province. Medicine Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 67–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/277005

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Beyazyürek M. Madde kullanım bozuklukları. Psikiyatri Dünyası, 2000;4:506. Moreno M, Estevez AF, Zaldivar F, et al. Impulsivity differences in recreational cannabis users and binge drinkers in a university population. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2012;124:355-62.
  2. Hollander E, Evers M. New developments in impulsivity. Lancet. 2001;358:949-50.
  3. Chamberlain SR, Sahakian BJ. The neuropsychiatry of impulsivity. Curr Opin Psychiatr. 2007;20:255-61.
  4. Torregrossa MM, Quinn JJ, Taylor JR. Impulsivity, compulsivity and habit: The role of orbitofrontal cortex revisited. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;63:253-5.
  5. Orum MH, Kustepe A, Kara MZ, et al. Addiction profiles of patients with substance dependency living in Adiyaman province. Med Science. 2018;7:369-72. Kollins SH. Delay discounting is associated with substance use in college students. Addict Behav. 2002;28:1167-73.
  6. Vonmoos M, Hulka LM, Preller KH, et al. Differences in self-reported and behavioral measures of impulsivity in recreational and dependent cocaine users. Drug Alcohol Dependence. 2013;133:61-70. De Wit H. Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: A review of underlying processes. Addict Biol. 2009;14:22-31.
  7. Perry JL, Carroll ME. The role of impulsive behaviour in drug abuse. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008;200:1-26. Karakas S. A descriptive frame work for in Formation processing: An integrative approach. In: Basar E, Hari R, Lopes Da Silva, Schürmann M, eds, Brain Alpha Activity: New Aspects and Functional Correlates. International Journal of Psycho physiology. 1999;26:353-68.
  8. Davies SJC, Pandit SA, Feeney A, et al. Is there cognitive impairment in clinically, healthy abstinent alcohol dependence? Alcohol Alcoholism. 2005;40:498-503.
  9. Konrad A, Vucurevic G, Lorscheider M, et al. Broad disruption of brain white matter microstructure and relationship with neuropsychological performance in male patients with severe alcohol Dependence. Alcohol Alcoholism. 2012;47:118-26.
  10. Türkeş N, Can H, Kurt M, ve ark. İz Sürme Testi’nin 20-49 yaş aralığında Türkiye için norm belirleme çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2015;26:18996. Güleç H, Tamam L, Güleç MY, et al. Barratt Dürtüsellik Ölçeği-11 (BIS11)’nin Türkçe uyarlamasının psikometrik özellikleri. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni. 2008;18:251-8.
  11. Asan Ö, Tıkır B, Okay İT, ve ark. Bir AMATEM birimine başvuran alkol ve madde kullanım bozukluğu olan hastaların sosyodemografik ve klinik özellikleri. Bağımlılık Dergisi. 2015;16:1-8.
  12. Türkmen SN, Kumaşoğlu Ç, Akyol T.