Journals / Medicine Science / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of patient specific quality assurance tests done with using different dosimetric systems for intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment plans

Pages
63–66
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In our study, the differences between the mean values of gamma pass rates determined before were statistically examined and there was significant difference between two dosimetric systems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Intensity modulated radiotherapy is the developed technique of 3 dimensional conformal radiation therapy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this method, irradiated fields can be seperated into many subfields that are called segments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In our study, the differences between the mean values of gamma pass rates determined before were statistically examined and there was significant difference between two dosimetric systems.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Intensity modulated radiotherapy is the developed technique of 3 dimensional conformal radiation therapy. In this method, irradiated fields can be seperated into many subfields that are called segments. Each segments’ radiation dose can be adjusted. Intensity modulated radiotherapy plans have complex segments and high gradient dose regions. Therefore, quality assurance of intensity modulated radiotherapy plans is very important. The aim of this study is to perform quality assurance tests of intensity modulated radiotherapy plans by using different dosimetric systems and compare of results. Intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment plans of thirty patients’ quality assurance were tested using Matrixx and Delta4. Then, gamma pass rates that were determined as a result of the gamma analysis done using gamma pass-fail criteria that had values of different dose difference and distance to agreement. In our study, the differences between the mean values of gamma pass rates determined before were statistically examined and there was significant difference between two dosimetric systems.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGEN, K. E., ÖZTEP, Ş. E., ÇELİK, M. B., YILMAZ, E. B., KABADAYI, M. (2019). Comparison of patient specific quality assurance tests done with using different dosimetric systems for intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment plans. Medicine Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 63–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/277004

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Meyer JL. New Technologies in the Radiotherapy Clinic. In: IMRT, IGRT, SBRT-Advances in the Treatment Planning and Delivery of Radiotherapy Department of Radiation Oncology. Karger, Basel, 2007;1-58. Podgorsak EB. Intensity modulated radiotherapy. In: Radiation oncology physics: A hand-book for teachers and students. IAEA, Vienna, 2005;534-8. Radyoterapi Tedavi Planlarının Dozimetrik Doğrulaması. http://medikalfizik. org/uploads/files/Radyoterapi Tedavi Planlarının Dozimetrik Doğrula-ması. pdf Chandraraj V, Esquivel C, Papanikolaou N. Comparison of four commercial devices for Rapid Arc and sliding window IMRT QA. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011:12;338–49.
  2. Kawrakow I, Fippel, M. Investigation of variance reduction techniques for Monte Carlo pho-ton dose calculation using XVMC. Phys Med Biol. 2000:45;2163-83. User’s Guide to the SP34 QA Phantom. Scanditronix Wellhöfer, Germany, 2003. User Manual of I’mRT MatriXX. Scanditronix Wellhöfer, Germany, 2003. Delta4: Getting Started. ScandiDos AB, 2009.
  3. DA Low, JF Dempsey. Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method. Me-dical Physics. 2003:30:2455-64.