Journals / Medicine Science / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Prevelance of flatfoot in secondary school students and its relationship with obesity

Pages
298–304
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that, 16.7% of women (9.8% flexible, 6.9% rigid), 16.1% of men (9.3% flexible, 6.8% rigid) had pes planus.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine the flatfoot prevalence of secondary school students and to investigate the relationship between obesity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As the population of the study consists of 28540 students between the ages of 10 and 18 living in Yeşilyurt and Battalgazi districts of Malatya province, the sample consisted of 3493 people, 1593 women and 1903 men.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that, 16.7% of women (9.8% flexible, 6.9% rigid), 16.1% of men (9.3% flexible, 6.8% rigid) had pes planus.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The aim of this study is to determine the flatfoot prevalence of secondary school students and to investigate the relationship between obesity. As the population of the study consists of 28540 students between the ages of 10 and 18 living in Yeşilyurt and Battalgazi districts of Malatya province, the sample consisted of 3493 people, 1593 women and 1903 men. It was found that, 16.7% of women (9.8% flexible, 6.9% rigid), 16.1% of men (9.3% flexible, 6.8% rigid) had pes planus. It was determined that 19.6% of the participants had problems in their feet and 9.7% of them had flexible, 6.9% had rigid pes planus and 3% had high arch. It was observed that 31.2% of overweight participants were flexible and 15.6% were rigid pes planus while 21.2% of the obese participants were flexible and 37.7% were rigid pes planus. The mean of visual analogue scale (VAS) scores in which the participants evaluated the pain in the lower part of the leg during the day was 6.0±.08, in students with flexible pes planus and 8.5±1.11 in students with rigid pes planus. As a result of the study, no significant relationship was found between gender and flatfoot, but there was a significant relationship between flatfoot and obesity in all age groups.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKMAZ, M. F., ACAK, M., DUZ, S., BOZDUMAN, Ö. (2020). Prevelance of flatfoot in secondary school students and its relationship with obesity. Medicine Science, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 298–304. https://ajindex.com/articles/276878

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Lee MS, Vanore JV, Thomas JL, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of adult flatfoot. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2005;44:78-113
  2. Levangie PK, Norkin CC. Joint structure and function: a comprehensive analysis: FA Davis 2011
  3. Mann RA. Acquired flatfoot in adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;181:46- 51
  4. Uzunca K, Tastekin N, Birtane M. Eriskin tip pes planusta agrı ve dizabilitenin radyografik ve pedobarografik parametreler ie ilskisi. Romatizma. 2006;21:95-9
  5. Ertürk M. Foot and ankle pain. Physical Med Rehabilit. 2000;2:1495-515
  6. Güler M. Foot pain. Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Manual. Turkey clinical Publisher. 1991:285-91
  7. Banwell HA, Mackintosh S, & Thewlis D. Foot orthoses for adults with flexible pes planus: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Res. 2014;7:1- 23
  8. Biyal F. Diyabet Yıllığı. İstanbul Üniversitesi. Fen Fakültesi. 1986;133
  9. Yıldız B. Adolesanda şişmanlık. Sendrom. 1993;6:43-5
  10. Hasipek, S. ve Sürücüoğlu, S.M. Şişmanlığın nedenleri ve yarattığı sağlık sorunları. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları.1988 11. Baysal A. Beslenme. Ankara. Hatipoğlu Yayınevi.6.Baskı.s.1996; 463-469
  11. Gümüşler A. Rize İli Çayeli ilçesindeki Lise Öğrencilerinde Obezite Sıklığı ve Beslenme Alışkanlıkları. Karadeniz Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Halk Sağlığı Ana Bilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi Trabzon 2006
  12. Schonfeld-Warden N, Warden CH. Pediatric obesity. Pediatric Clin North Am. 1997;44.339-61
  13. Sur H, Kolotourou M, Dimitriou M. et al. Biochemical and behavioral indices related to BMI in school children in urban Turkey. Prev Med. 2005;41:614- 21
  14. Kanatlı U, Yetkin H, Cila E. Footprint and Radiographic Analysis of the Feet. J Pediatrric Orthop. 2001;21: 225-8
  15. Staheli LT, Chew DE, Corbett M. The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:426-8
  16. Scott G, Menz HB, Newcombe L. Age-related differences in foot structure and function. Gait Posture. 2007;26:68-75
  17. Heo M, Allison DB, Faith MS, et al. Obesity and quality of life: mediating effects of pain and comorbidities. Obes Res. 2003;11:209–16
  18. Hooper MM, Stellato TA, Hallowell PT, et al. Musculoskeletal findings in obese subjects before and after weight loss following bariatric surgery. Int J Obes. 2007;31:114–20
  19. Frey C, Zamora J. The effects of obesity on orthopaedic foot and ankle pathology. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28.996–9
  20. Tulunay M., & Tulunay FC. Ağrının değer