Journals / Medicine Science / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Surgeon factor in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures

Pages
103–108
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Individual preferences may result in differences in operative time and case-specific complication rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The surgeon and the surgical approach of the clinic where the surgeon was trained may have an impact on perioperative outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, among the surgeons with similar surgical experiences, we aimed to investigate the association of open-closed reduction rates, postoperative sagittal, coronal and axial plan deformities, and prefer-ence of open surgical approaches to surgeons and the clinics they were trained.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Individual preferences may result in differences in operative time and case-specific complication rates.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The surgeon and the surgical approach of the clinic where the surgeon was trained may have an impact on perioperative outcomes. In this study, among the surgeons with similar surgical experiences, we aimed to investigate the association of open-closed reduction rates, postoperative sagittal, coronal and axial plan deformities, and prefer-ence of open surgical approaches to surgeons and the clinics they were trained. We evaluated 90 cases retrospectively who underwent surgery upon diagnosis of Gartland type 3 pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures associated with extension deformity. Those whose surgery was performed after 24 hours, or patients with open fractures, flexion type supracondylar fractures, non-Gartland type 3 supracondylar fractures, fractures with neurovascular deficits, multiple comminuted fractures, pathologic frac-tures, or additional injury and fractures were not included to the study. All the surgeons who had >5 years of surgical experience as a specialist and >15 of pediatric elbow fracture surgery as an operator (n=12) were numbered between 1 and 12. The clinics of these surgeons were classified from A to F (n=6). Data on patients’ age, gender, duration of surgery, follow-up time, postoperative sagittal, coronal angulation, postoperative rotational deformity, operation time, rates of open-closed surgery, the surgical approach in those open surgery was performed, the number and characteristics of the pins used were collected to analyze in relation with their assigned surgeons and the clinics they were trained. Among the 90 cases, 54 (59.3%) were male patients. The mean age was 6.21±3.03 years. There was no significant difference between the clinics in terms of sagittal and rotational deformities and open reduction rates (p>0.05). The clinics significantly differed in preference of the side of incisions (medial, lateral, posterior), (p<0.05). The number of pins, Baumann, and lateral humerocapitellar angles was similar between the clinics. The mean duration of the surgery (41.54±17.02 min) of the surgeons from the F clinic was lower than that of the other clinics (p: 0.004). In open surgeries, there was not a significant difference between surgeons in terms of single or double incision and side of the incision (medial, lateral, posterior) (p: 0.094). The number of pins also significantly differed among surgeons (p: 0.009). The type of surgical approach and treatment modality in pediatric supracondylar fractures is at the surgeon’s discretion and therefore may be influenced by the approach of the clinic where the surgeon had specialty training. Nevertheless, within-clinic variations might also occur depending on the surgeon’s preference or their role model advisor. Individual preferences may result in differences in operative time and case-specific complication rates.

🔖

Cite This Article

YUCE, A., IGDE, N., IMREN, Y., DEDOGLU, S. S., GURBUZ, H. (2020). Surgeon factor in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. Medicine Science, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 103–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/276805

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Singh I, Rupabati Devi RK, Sharma GS. A Prospective Study of Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children Treated by Closed Reduction. Journal of Evidence-based Medicine and Healthcare. 2015;2:4958-67
  2. Shah SA, Asimuddin M. Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: Conservative versus operative. International J Orthopaedics Sciences 2017;3:14-20
  3. O’Hara LJ, Barlow JW, Clarke NMP. Displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000;82:204-10
  4. Mehserle WL, Meehan PL. Treatment of the displaced supracondylar fracture of the humerus (type III) with closed reduction and percutaneous cross-pin fixation. J Pediatr Orthop. 1991;11:705-11
  5. Rasool MN, Naidoo KS. Supracondylar fractures: posterolateral type with brachialis muscle penetration and neurovascular injury. J PediatrOrthop.1999;19:518-22
  6. Archibeck MJ, Scott SM, Peters CL. Brachialis muscle entrapment in displaced supracondylar humerus fractures: a technique of closed reduction and report of initial results. J Pediatr Orthop.1997;17:298-302
  7. Yildirim AÖ, Unal VS, Oken OF, et al. Timing of surgical treatment for type III supracondylar humerus fractures in pediatric patients. J Child Orthop 2009;3:265-9
  8. Pesenti S, Ecalle A, Peltier E, et al. Experience and volume are determinative factors for operative humeral fractures in children. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;1-7
  9. Liu RW, Roocroft J, Bastrom T, et al. Surgeon Learning Curve for Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 2011;31:818–24
  10. DeFrancesco CJ, Shah AS, Brusalis CM, et al. Rate of Open Reduction for Supracondylar Humerus Fractures Varies Across Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons: A Single-Institution Analysis. J Orthop Trauma.2018;32:400-7
  11. Williamson DM, Coates CJ, Miller RK, et al. Normal characteristics of the Baumann (humerocapitellar) angle: an aid in assessment of supracondylar fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 1992;12:636-9). (Labelle H, Bunnell WP, Duhaime M, Poitras B. Cubitusvarus deformity following supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1982;2:539-46
  12. Cheng JYC, Shen WY. Limb fracture pattern in different paediatric age group: a study of 3,350 children. J Orthop Trauma.1993;7:15-22
  13. Mangwani J, Nadarajah R, Paterson JMH. Supracondylar humeral fractures in children TEN YEARS’ EXPERIENCE IN A TEACHING HOSPITAL. J Bone Joint Surg. [Br] 2006;88:362-5
  14. Li J, Fu D, Yu C, et al. Surgical management