Journals / Medicine Science / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Pseudo-Outbreak of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolated from Kidney Stones and Attributed to Inadequate Sterilization: Investigation of Molecular Typing and Clonal Relationship

Pages
589–594
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After disinfection protocols were reviewed and revised as needed, especially regarding the removal of organic material from nephroscopes after use, no further bacterial growth was detected from kidney stone specimens obtained with nephroscopes

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a gram-negative bacterium.
📊
Key Findings & Data:S. maltophilia was isolated from 34 of 94 kidney stone samples sent from the urology operating room between July 2017 and January 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After disinfection protocols were reviewed and revised as needed, especially regarding the removal of organic material from nephroscopes after use, no further bacterial growth was detected from kidney stone specimens obtained with nephroscopes
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a gram-negative bacterium. Hospitals can be a source of S. maltophilia because it adheres to nonliving surfaces and forms a biofilm. This study was performed to investigate the clonal relationship between S. maltophilia isolates obtained from kidney stone samples. Samples of kidney stones taken from patients and surrogate samples from nephroscopes, cleaning solution, disinfectant solution were included in the study. The clonal relationship between isolates was determined by PFGE. S. maltophilia was isolated from 34 of 94 kidney stone samples sent from the urology operating room between July 2017 and January 2018. A total of 26 S. maltophilia strains (21 from kidney stone samples, three from nephroscopes, and two from urine culture) were isolated. PFGE showed that the 21 kidney stone isolates and the 3 S. maltophilia isolates obtained from the nephroscope belonged to the same clone. The two urine culture isolates showed no clonal relationship to the outbreak isolates and were considered sporadic. Molecular typing confirmed that this pseudo-outbreak was attributed to inadequate disinfection of the nephroscopes. After disinfection protocols were reviewed and revised as needed, especially regarding the removal of organic material from nephroscopes after use, no further bacterial growth was detected from kidney stone specimens obtained with nephroscopes

🔖

Cite This Article

YİŞ, R., TOSUN, S., BAYRAM, E. D., GÜLFİDAN, Ö. G., DEĞİRMENCİ, T., GÜNLÜSOY, B., OTLU, B., KUZUCU, Ç. (2020). Pseudo-Outbreak of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolated from Kidney Stones and Attributed to Inadequate Sterilization: Investigation of Molecular Typing and Clonal Relationship. Medicine Science, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 589–594. https://ajindex.com/articles/276751

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Brooke JS. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: An Emerging Global Opportunistic Pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25:2-41
  2. Guyot A, Turton JF, Garner D. Outbreak of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia on an intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect. 2013;85:303-7
  3. Gulcan H, Kuzucu C, Durmaz R. Nosocomial Stenotrophomonas maltophilia cross-infection: Three cases in newborns. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32:365- 8
  4. Vartivarian SE, Papadakis KA, Anaissie EJ. Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas) maltophilia Urinary Tract Infection. A disease that is usually severe and complicated. Arc Intern Med. 1996;156:433-5
  5. Sakhnini E, Weissmann A, Oren I. Fulminant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia soft tissue infection in immunocompromised patients: An outbreak transmitted via tap water. Am J Med Sci. 2002;323:269-72
  6. Stigt JA, Wolfhagen MJ, Smulders P, et al. The identification of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia contamination in ultrasound endoscopes and reproduction of decontamination failure by deliberate soiling tests. Respiration. 2015;89:565-71
  7. Abbott IJ, Slavin MA, Turnidge JD, et al. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia emerging disease patterns and challenges for treatment. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011;9:471-88
  8. Rial MB, Fernandez VL, Delgado MN, et al. A pseudo- outbreak of Pseudomonas putida and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in a bronchoscopy unit. Respiration. 2016;92:274-8
  9. Kayabas U, Bayraktar M, Otlu B, et al. An outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa because of inadequate disinfection procedures in a urology unit: A pulsed-field gel electrophoresis-based epidemiologic study. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36:33-8
  10. Durmaz R, Otlu B, Koksal F, et al. The optimization of a rapid pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocol for the typing of Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2009;62:372-7
  11. Waite TD, Georgiou A, Abrishami M, et al. Pseudo-outbreaks Stenotrophomonas maltophilia on an intensive care unit in England. J Hosp Infect. 2016; 92:392-6
  12. Guy M, Vanhems P, Dananche C, et al. Outbreak of Pseudomona saeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections related to contaminated bronchoscope suction valves Lyon, France 2014. Euro Surveill. 2016;14;21
  13. Smith’s Textbook Endourology 3rd Edition, Edited by Arthur D Smith, Gopal Badlani, Glenn M Preminger, Louis R Kavoussi (2012). Wiley Blackwell, UK. (Carol Olsen; Care and sterilization of instruments page 3-9.
  14. Rutala WA, Weber DJ, and The Healthcare Infection Control Pr