Journals / Medicine Science / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of the patient with lymphadenopathy: Is it always easy to reach the correct diagnosis?

Pages
202–206
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, undiagnosed patients should be followed, and the institutions should develop policies for this purpose, such as telemedicine applications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Lymphadenopathy (LAP) is a common clinical problem in adult patients and should be thoroughly evaluated in a tertiary hospital to investigate its reasons.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was designed to include adult patients with neck, armpit, or groin swelling accompanied by symptoms, such as fever, night sweats, weight loss, cough and sputum between January 2010 and August 2017, retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, undiagnosed patients should be followed, and the institutions should develop policies for this purpose, such as telemedicine applications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Lymphadenopathy (LAP) is a common clinical problem in adult patients and should be thoroughly evaluated in a tertiary hospital to investigate its reasons. In this study, we aimed to present the demographic characteristics, etiology, diagnosis and follow-up results of the patients who applied with LAP symptoms and findings. This study was designed to include adult patients with neck, armpit, or groin swelling accompanied by symptoms, such as fever, night sweats, weight loss, cough and sputum between January 2010 and August 2017, retrospectively. Patients’ data were collected from electronic files. Patients were diagnosed using radiological, histopathological, bacteriological, serological and other microbiological methods. Two hundred-thirty patients were included in this study. The mean age was 43.12±17.06 SD in males and 45.74±16.64 in females. On admission, the most common symptoms were night sweats (31%), fever (23%), weight loss (17%) and cough and/or sputum (13%) in order of frequency. However, 16% of the patients were asymptomatic. In this study, 157 (68.26%) patients were diagnosed. Tuberculosis (n=76; 33%), malignancies (n=28, 12.1%) and tularemia (N=14; 6.1%) were the most common diseases causing LAP that was most commonly located in the bilateral cervical chain. Lymphadenopathy should be evaluated comprehensively concerning diagnosing or ruling out many diseases that must be treated necessarily. Knowledge and awareness of the diseases as a cause of LAP may contribute to the early and correct diagnosis. Therefore, undiagnosed patients should be followed, and the institutions should develop policies for this purpose, such as telemedicine applications.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖSE, A., DOĞAN, A., BAYİNDİR, Y., ERSOY, Y., ÖZDEN, M., MEMİŞOĞLU, F., TOPLU, S., GEZER, Y. (2021). Evaluation of the patient with lymphadenopathy: Is it always easy to reach the correct diagnosis?. Medicine Science, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 202–206. https://ajindex.com/articles/276742

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Morland B. Lymphadenopathy. Arch Dis Child. 1995;73:476-9
  2. Fijten GH, Blijham GH. Unexplained lymphadenopathy in family practice. An evaluation of the probability of malignant causes and the effectiveness of physicians’ workup. J Fam Pract. 1988;27:373-6
  3. Gaddey HL, Riegel AM. Unexplained Lymphadenopathy: Evaluation and Differential Diagnosis Am Fam Physician. 2016:1;94:896-903
  4. Habermann TM, Steensma DP. Lymphadenopathy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:723-32
  5. Viiala N, Gibson J [Internet]. An approach to the assessment of lymphadenopathy. [cited 2007 Jan 10 ]. Available from: http://www. medicalobserver.com.au/news/an-approachto-the-assessment-oflymphadenopathy
  6. Bazemore AW, Smucker DR. Lymphadenopathy and malignancy. Am Fam Physician. 2002;66:2103-10
  7. Chau I, Kelleher MT, Cunningham D, et al. Rapid access multidisciplinary lymph node diagnostic clinic: analysis of 550 patients. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:354-61
  8. Haynes J, Arnold KR, Oskıns CA, et al. Evaluation of neck masses in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2015;91:698-706
  9. Richner S, Laifer G. Peripheral lymphadenopathy in immunocompetent adults. Swiss Med Wkly 2010;140:98-104
  10. Gul M, Aliosmanoglu I, Turkoglu A, et al. Erişkin çağı periferik lenfadenopatileri. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 2013;40:245-9
  11. Bosch X, Coloma E, Donate C, et al. Evaluation of unexplained peripheral lymphadenopathy and suspected malignancy using a distinct quick diagnostic delivery model: prospective study of 372 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014;93:e95
  12. Mbata GC, Nweke IG, Egejuru RO, et al. South eastern histologic pattern of lymph node biopsies in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. J AIDS Clin Res. 2015;6:6:475-8
  13. Lee Y, Terry R, Lukes RJ. Lymph node biopsy for diagnosis: a statistical study. J Surg Oncol. 1980;14:53-60
  14. Deveci HS, Kule M, Kule ZA, et al. Diagnostic challenges in cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis: A review. North Clin Istanb. 2016;3:150–5
  15. Albayrak N, Celebi B, Kavas S, et al. Investigation of the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the lymph node aspirates of the suspected tularemia lymphadenitis cases. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2014;48:129-34
  16. Rahman A, Biswas MA, Siddika TS, Sikder AM. Histopathological Evaluation of Lymph Node Biopsies: A Hospital Based Study. J Enam Med Col. 2012;2(1):8-14
  17. Shah KK, Pritt BS, Alexandera MP. Histopathologic review of granulomatous inflammation. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2017;7:1–12
  18. Mohseni S, Shojaiefard A, Khorgami Z, et al. Per