Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 49

A CRITICAL OVERVIEW OF INTERNET OF THINGS IN EDUCATION

EĞİTİMDE NESNELERİN İNTERNETİNE KRİTİK BİR BAKIŞ

Pages
302–327
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, this study highlights those benefits and discusses problematic issues, particularly with respect to access to digital devices and the Internet.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As a relatively new concept, Internet of things (IoT) seems to offer some potentials for learning and teaching.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although this catchy term is becoming more and more popular in educational contexts, there is still need for clearing up the minds of teachers and students with respect to the nature of it and how it could be used for teaching and learning purposes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, this study highlights those benefits and discusses problematic issues, particularly with respect to access to digital devices and the Internet.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Nesneleri interneti (Nİ) · eğitim · yönetim

Abstract

As a relatively new concept, Internet of things (IoT) seems to offer some potentials for learning and teaching. Although this catchy term is becoming more and more popular in educational contexts, there is still need for clearing up the minds of teachers and students with respect to the nature of it and how it could be used for teaching and learning purposes. In this sense, this study aims to locate IoT in instruction and to provide a critical overview of it. It also makes a distinction between the use of IoT at the management and instructional levels in educational contexts. Today, educators seem to support the use of IoT in education but they mostly put forward ideas that seem to represent the use of IoT from an administrative perspective, leaving little space for discussions centering on direct instructional potentials of IoT. Therefore, this study highlights those benefits and discusses problematic issues, particularly with respect to access to digital devices and the Internet.

Özet

Oldukça yeni bir kavram olan Nesnelerin interneti (Nİ) öğrenme ve öğretmeye yönelik olası bazı imkanlar sunabilmektedir. Bu dikkat çekici terim eğitim ortamlarında gitgide daha popüler hale gelmesine rağmen, Nİ’nin doğası ve öğretme ve öğrenme açısından bu karamın nasıl kullanılabileceğine dair bilgi edinerek öğretmenlerin ve öğrencilerin aydınlanmaya ihtiyaç vardır. Bu bakımdan bu çalışma Nİ’nin eğitimdeki yerini tartışmakta ve eleştirel bir bakıç açısı ile konuyu genel olarak ele almaktadır. Aynı zamanda Nİ’nin eğitim ortamlarında yönetimsel ve öğretimsel kullanımı arasında bir ayrım yapmaktadır. Günmüzde eğitimciler Nİ’nin eğitimde kullanımını desteklemektedir; ancak genellikle Nİ’nin yönetimsel bir bakış açısıyla kullanımına karşılık gelen fikirleri öne sürmektedirler. Bu da Nİ’nin doğrudan öğretimsel potansiyelleri üzerine yoğunlaşan tartışmalara yer bırakmamaktadır. Bu nedenle bu çalışma Nİ’nin olası faydalarını vurgulamakta ve özellikle dijital cihazlara ve internete erişim başta olmak üzere problemli konuları ele almaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAKLA, A. (2019). A CRITICAL OVERVIEW OF INTERNET OF THINGS IN EDUCATION. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 49, 302–327. https://ajindex.com/articles/276314

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Asseo, I., Johnson, M., Nilsson, B., Neti, C., & Costello, T. J. (2016). The Internet of things: Riding the wave in higher education. Educause Review, 51, 11–33.
  2. Aston, J. (2017, 2017-03-27). Education and the Internet of Things: Tech gets smaller, learning gets bigger | Stone. Retrieved from https://www.stonegroup.co.uk/the-internet-of-things/
  3. Attallah, B, & Ilagure, Z. (2018). Wearable technology: Facilitating or complexing education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(6), 433–436. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.6.1077
  4. Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The Internet of Things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54, 2787-2805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010
  5. Augur, H. (2015). IoT In Education: The Internet of School Things. Baik, S. (2012). Rethinking QR code: analog portal to digital world. Multimedia tools and applications, 58(2), 427–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-010-0686-9
  6. Baruffi, S. (2015). What happens when QR codes are used to increase student engagement, motivation and independence in a fourth grade basic skills classroom? Benson, C. (2016).
  7. The Internet of things, IoT systems, and higher education. Educause Review, 51, 34–43.
  8. Brown, J. L. (2017, 2017-03-23T11:41-04:00). How Will the Internet of Things Impact Education? EdTech Magazine. Retrieved from https://edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2017/03/how-will-internet-things-impact-education
  9. Cajide, J. (2015, 2015-11-11). The Connected School: How IoT Could Impact Education. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeanette-cajide/the-connected-school-how-_b_8521612.html
  10. Correll, P. (2015, 2015-05-13). IoT in Education. Retrieved from https://edtechdigest.com/2015/05/13/iot-in-education/ de Arriba-Pérez, F., Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., & Santos-Gago, J. M. (2017). Towards the use of commercial wrist wearables in education. Paper presented at the Experiment@ International Conference (exp. at'17), 2017 4th. https://doi.org/10.1109/EXPAT.2017.7984354 de la Guia, E., Lopez Camacho, V., Orozco-Barbosa, L., Brea Lujan, V. M., Penichet, V. M. R., & Lozano Perez, M. (2016). Introducing IoT and Wearable Technologies into Task-Based Language Learning for Young Children. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(4), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2016.2557333
  11. Ezenwoke, A., & Ezenwoke, O. (2016). Wearable Technology: Opportunities and Challenges for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education in Developing Countries. Paper presented at 10th Inte