SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kulak Burun Boğaz Uygulamaları / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of functional outcomes of spreader graft and spreader flap used in rinoplasty

Rinoplastide kullanılan spreader greft ve spreader flebin fonksiyonel sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi

Burak ERDEN
Burak Mustafa TAŞ
Pages
8–11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The functional outcomes of spreader grafts and spreader f laps, which are widely used in middle roof reconstruction in open technique rhinoplasty are similar with significant postoperative improvement rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: In this study, we aimed to compare the functional results of spreader graft and spreader f lap used in middle roof reconstruction in open technique rhinoplasty.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: Between April 2018 and June 2019, a total of 40 patients (18 males, 22 females; mean age: 25.5±6.1 years; range, 18 to 42 years) were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The functional outcomes of spreader grafts and spreader f laps, which are widely used in middle roof reconstruction in open technique rhinoplasty are similar with significant postoperative improvement rates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to compare the functional results of spreader graft and spreader f lap used in middle roof reconstruction in open technique rhinoplasty. Patients and Methods: Between April 2018 and June 2019, a total of 40 patients (18 males, 22 females; mean age: 25.5±6.1 years; range, 18 to 42 years) were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups as those receiving spreader grafts (Group 1, n=20) and those receiving spreader f laps (Group 2, n=20). Functional outcomes and quality of life of the patients were evaluated using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale and Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) preoperatively and at six months postoperatively. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age and sex. The postoperative scores of NOSE and SNOT-22 were significantly lower than the preoperative scores in both groups (p 0.05). Conclusion: The functional outcomes of spreader grafts and spreader f laps, which are widely used in middle roof reconstruction in open technique rhinoplasty are similar with significant postoperative improvement rates.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, açık teknik rinoplastide orta çatı rekonstrüksiyonunda kullanılan spreader greft ve spreader f lebin fonksiyonel sonuçları karşılaştırıldı. Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Nisan 2018 - Haziran 2019 tarihleri arasında toplam 40 hasta (18 erkek, 22 kadın; ort. yaş: 25.5±6.1 yıl; dağılım, 18-42 yıl) çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastalar spreader greft kullanılanlar (Grup 1, n=20) ve spreader f lep kullanılanlar (Grup 2, n=20) olmak üzere iki gruba ayrıldı. Hastaların fonksiyonel sonuçları ve yaşam kalitesi ameliyat öncesi ve ameliyat sonrası altıncı ayda Burun Tıkanıklığı Semptomu Değerlendirme Ölçeği (NOSE) ve Sinonazal Sonuç Testi-22 (SNOT-22) ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Gruplar arasında yaş ve cinsiyet açısından anlamlı bir farklılık saptanmadı. Her iki grupta da ameliyat sonrası NOSE ve SNOT-22 skorları, ameliyat öncesi skorlara kıyasla, anlamlı düzeyde düşük idi (p 0.05). Sonuç: Açık teknik rinoplastide orta çatı rekonstrüksiyonunda yaygın olarak kullanılan spreader greft ve spreader f lebin fonksiyonel sonuçları, ameliyat sonrası anlamlı iyileşme oranları ile birbirine benzerdi.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEN, B., TAŞ, B. M. (2021). Evaluation of functional outcomes of spreader graft and spreader flap used in rinoplasty. Kulak Burun Boğaz Uygulamaları, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 8–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/274511

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Rohrich RJ, Muzaffar AR, Janis JE. Component dorsal hump reduction: the importance of maintaining dorsal aesthetic lines in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1298-308
  2. Apaydin F. Nasal valve surgery. Facial Plast Surg 2011;27:179-91
  3. Sheen JH. Spreader graft: a method of reconstructing the roof of the middle nasal vault following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;73:230-9
  4. Mendelsohn M. Straightening the crooked middle third of the nose: using porous polyethylene extended spreader grafts. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7:74-80
  5. Mladina R, Skitarelić N, Poje G, Šubarić M. Clinical Implications of Nasal Septal Deformities. Balkan Med J 2015;32:137-46
  6. Wurm J, Kovacevic M. A new classification of spreader f lap techniques. Facial Plast Surg 2013;29:506-14
  7. Daniel RK, Palhazi P. The Nasal Ligaments and Tip Support in Rhinoplasty: An Anatomical Study. Aesthet Surg J 2018;38:357-68
  8. Hwang NH, Dhong ES. Septal extension graft in asian rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2018; 26:331-41
  9. Hassanpour SE, Heidari A, Moosavizadeh SM, Tarahomi MR, Goljanian A, Tavakoli S. Comparison of aesthetic and functional outcomes of spreader graft and autospreader f lap in rhinoplasty. World J Plast Surg 2016;5:133-8
  10. Mamanov M, Batioglu-Karaaltin A, Inci E, Erdur ZB. Effect of spreader graft on nasal functions in septorhinoplasty surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2017;28:e618-e621
  11. Standlee AG, Hohman MH. Evaluating the effect of spreader grafting on nasal obstruction using the NOSE Scale. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2017;126:219-23
  12. Sowder JC, Thomas AJ, Gonzalez CD, Limaye NS, Ward PD. Use of spreader f laps without dorsal hump reduction and the effect on nasal function. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2 017;19:287-92
  13. Shafaeei Y, Zare NJ. A Comparison of the aesthetics outcomes and respiratory side effects of the use of spreader f lap and spreader graft techniques in open rhinoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 2019;30:2546-8
  14. Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:157-63
  15. Strazdins E, Nie YF, Ramli R, Palesy T, Christensen JM, Alvarado R, et al. Association between mental health status and patient satisfaction with the functional outcomes of rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018;20:284-91
  16. Na'ara S, Kaptzan B, Gil Z, Ostrovsky D. Endoscopic septoplasty versus traditional septoplasty f