SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Determining Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies used by 9th Grade Students Before, while and After Solving Multiple-Choice Science Questions

9. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Fen Bilimleri Alanındaki Çoktan Seçmeli Soruların Çözümü Öncesi, Esnası, Sonrasında Kullandıkları Bilişsel ve Üstbilişsel Stratejilerin Belirlenmesi

Emine Hatun DİKEN
NEJLA YÜRÜK
Pages
1071–1099
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that Science High School students employed metacognition strategies after solving the questions, Anatolian High School students used very few in number and variety and Vocational High School students used no metacognition strategies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The current study determines the cognitive and metacognitive strategies used by the 9th grade students at Science High Schools, Anatolian High Schools and Vocational High Schools before, while and after solving multiple-choice science questions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The findings of the study revealed that the students at Science High Schools used cognitive and metacognition strategies in a greater number and variety than those at Anatolian High Schools and Vocational High Schools before and while solving science questions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that Science High School students employed metacognition strategies after solving the questions, Anatolian High School students used very few in number and variety and Vocational High School students used no metacognition strategies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Problem Çözme · Bilişsel Stratejiler · Üstbilişsel Stratejiler

Abstract

The current study determines the cognitive and metacognitive strategies used by the 9th grade students at Science High Schools, Anatolian High Schools and Vocational High Schools before, while and after solving multiple-choice science questions. Fifteen students, five from each high school type, participated in the study. Qualitative research designs was used in the study. The findings of the study revealed that the students at Science High Schools used cognitive and metacognition strategies in a greater number and variety than those at Anatolian High Schools and Vocational High Schools before and while solving science questions. It was ascertained that the students in all high school types did not use cognitive strategies after answering science questions. The results indicated that Science High School students employed metacognition strategies after solving the questions, Anatolian High School students used very few in number and variety and Vocational High School students used no metacognition strategies.

Özet

Bu araştırmada Fen Lisesi, Anadolu Liseleri ve Meslek Lisesi 9. sınıf öğrencilerinin Fen Bilimleri alanındaki çoktan seçmeli soruların çözümü öncesi, esnası, sonrasındaki süreçlerde kullandıkları bilişsel ve üstbilişsel stratejiler belirlenmiştir. Araştırmaya her bir liseden beş öğrenci olmak üzere on beş öğrenci katılmıştır. Araştırmada nitel araştırma deseni kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda; genel olarak Fen Bilimleri alanındaki çoktan seçmeli soruların çözümü öncesi ve esnasındaki süreçlerde Fen Lisesi öğrencilerinin Anadolu Liseleri ile Meslek Lisesi öğrencilerine göre fazla sayıda, çeşitte bilişsel ve üstbilişsel strateji kullandıkları belirlenmiştir. Soruların çözümü sonrasında öğrencilerin tamamının bilişsel strateji kullanmadıkları belirlenmiştir. Soruların çözümü sonrasında Fen Lisesi öğrencilerinin üstbilişsel strateji kullandıkları, Anadolu Liseleri öğrencilerinin çok az sayıda, çeşitte üstbilişsel strateji kullandıkları, Meslek Lisesi öğrencilerinin ise üstbilişsel strateji kullanmadıkları tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİKEN, E. H., YÜRÜK, N. (2019). Determining Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies used by 9th Grade Students Before, while and After Solving Multiple-Choice Science Questions. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 1071–1099. https://ajindex.com/articles/274346

References (6)

  1. Abdullah, F.A.P.B. (2006). The pattern of physics problem- solving from the perspective of metacognition. Unpublished master’s dissertation, University of Cambridge. Retrieved March 12, 2009, http://people.pwf.cam.ac.ok /kst24/ResearchStudents/ Abdullah 2006metacognition.Adelson, B. (1984). When novices surpass experts: the difficulty of a task may increase with expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 483-495.Altun, M. (2001). Matematik öğretimi. İstanbul:
  2. ALFA Basım Yayın Dağıtım.Anderson, J., Greeno, J., Kline, P., & Neves, D. (1981). Acquisition of problem solving skill. In J.R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition, (pp. 313-230).
  3. Hillsdale, JH: Erlbaum.Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from text by means of informed, self-control training (Technical Report No. 262). Urbana: University of Illinois, Centre for the study of Reading.Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., & Connell, M. L. (1988). Metacognition: On the importance of understanding what you are doing. In R. I. Charles & E. A. Edward (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (pp. 93-114).
  4. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Chi, M., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Sciences, 5, 121-152.Clement, J. J. (1991). Constructivism in the classroom: a review of transforming children’s mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 422-428.Davidson, J.E., Deuser, R., & Sternberg, R.J. (1994). The role of metacognition in problem solving. In J. Metcalf and A.P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition (pp. 207-226).
  5. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.Dhillon, A. (1998). Individual differences within problem-solving strategies used in physics. Science Education, 82(3), 379-405.Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235).
  6. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognitive and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologyst, 34, 906-911.Finegold, M., & Mass, r. (1985). Differences in the processes of solving physics problems between good physics problem solvers and poor physics problem solvers. Research in Science and Technological Education, 3, 59-67.Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. K., Jr. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and