Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 5

Et ürünlerinde ısıl işlem uygulamaları ve pH’nın genetiği değiştirilmiş (GD) soyanın PCR ile tespiti üzerine etkisi

The effect of heat processing and pH on PCR detection of genetically modified (GM) Soy in meat products

Pages
765–771
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We found that the combined efects of heat and low pH afect the detection limit, but low levels of GM soy can still be detected after processing.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Soybean is the most cultivated GM crop worldwide, being planted on 47% of the global GM crop area.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In 2010, regulations on GM foods began to be enforced in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We found that the combined efects of heat and low pH afect the detection limit, but low levels of GM soy can still be detected after processing.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Soybean is the most cultivated GM crop worldwide, being planted on 47% of the global GM crop area. However, GM crops have not been widely publicly accepted. Thus, countries have established regulations for the labeling of GM foods to inform consumer decision making. In 2010, regulations on GM foods began to be enforced in Turkey. To meet these legislation requirements, the development of reliable detection methods is an important priority in this research area. PCR-based methods are most commonly used for this purpose. However, processing factors (low pH, heat etc.) afect DNA quality and thus the sensitivity of PCR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the combined efects of heat and pH on the detection of GM soy in meat products. We found that the combined efects of heat and low pH afect the detection limit, but low levels of GM soy can still be detected after processing.

Özet

Soya fasulyesi dünya genelinde en yaygın ekilen GD tahıl ürünü olup toplam GD tarım üretim alanının %47’sini teşkil etmektedir. Buna karşın, GD tarım ürünleri tüketiciler tarafından yaygın olarak kabul görmemektedir. Bu yüzden, çeşitli ülkeler tüketicilere karar verme olanağı tanımak üzere GD gıdaların etiketlemesine yönelik yönetmelikler hazırlamıştır. Nihayetinde, 2010 yılında ülkemizde de GD gıdalarla ilgili mevzuat yürürlüğe girmiştir. Yönetmelik şartlarını karşılamak için, güvenilir tespit metotlarının geliştirilmesi bu bilim alanının önceliklerinden biri haline gelmiştir. Bu amaçla PCR-temelli metotlar en yaygın kullanılan teşhis yöntemlerindendir. Ancak, çeşitli gıda üretim yöntemleri (düşük pH, sıcaklık v.b.) DNA kalitesini ve böylece PCR hassasiyetini etkilemektedir. Çalışmamızın amacı, ısı ve pH’ın et ürünlerinde GD soyanın PCR tespitine olan kombine etkisini değerlendirmektir. Sonuçlarımıza göre, düşük pH ve ısının kombine etkisi tespit limitini etkilemekle beraber, proses sonrası dahi oldukça düşük seviyelerde GD soyanın tespiti mümkün olabilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARUN, Ö. Ö., MURATOĞLU, K., YILMAZ, F. E. (2014). Et ürünlerinde ısıl işlem uygulamaları ve pH’nın genetiği değiştirilmiş (GD) soyanın PCR ile tespiti üzerine etkisi. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 5, 765–771. https://ajindex.com/articles/273647

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Forte VT, Di Pinto A, Martino C, Tantillo GM, Grasso G, Schena FP: A general multiplex-PCR assay for the general detection of genetically modified soya and maize. Food Control, 16, 535-539, 2005
  2. Meyer R, Chardonnens F, Hübner P, Lüthy J: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the quality and safety assurance of food: detection soya in processed meat products. Z Lebensm Unters For, 203, 339-344, 1996
  3. Taski-Ajdukovic K, Nikolic Z, Vujakovic M, Milosevic M, Ignjatov M, Petrovic D: Detection of genetically modified organisms in processed meat products on the Serbian food market. Meat Sci, 81, 230-232, 2009
  4. Belloque J, Garcia MC, Torre M, Marina ML: Analysis of soyabean proteins in meat products: A review. Crit Rev Food Sci, 42 (5): 507-532, 2002
  5. Kurt Ş, Kılınççeker O: The efects of cereal and legume fours on the quality characteristics of beef patties. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg,18 (5): 725-730, 2012
  6. James C: Executive summary of Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2012. (ISAAA Briefs No: 44) Ithaca, NY, 2012
  7. Ujhelyi G, Vajda B, Béki E, Neszlényi K, Jakab J, Jánosi A, Némedi E, Gelencsér E: Surveying the RR soy content of commercially available food products in Hungary. Food Control, 19, 967-973, 2008
  8. Anonymous: Regulation of the Turkish Republic, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Afairs on; import, export, processing, control and monitoring of Genetically Modified Organisms and their products used as food and feed. Official J, 27388/Issue date: 26 10 2009
  9. Anonymous: Turkish Republic Bio safety law: Law number 5977. Official J, 27533/Issue date: 26.03.2010
  10. Anonymous: Regulation of the Turkish Republic, Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Animal breeding of Genetically Modified organisms and their products. Official J, 27671/Issue date: 13.08.2010 11. Miraglia M, Berdal KG, Brera C, Corbisier P, Holst-Jensen A, Kok EJ, Marvin HJP, Schimmel H, Rentsch J, Van Rie JPPF, Zagon J: Detection and traceability of genetically modified organisms in the food production chain. Food Chem Toxicol, 42, 1157-1180, 2004
  11. Regulation (EC): No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labeling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC. Official J L, 268, 18/10/2003, 024-028, 2003
  12. Sieradzki Z, Walczak M, Kwiatek K: Occurence of genetically modif