Journals / Journal of Istanbul Veterinary Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

The effect of processing factors on detection of genetically modified soy in flour by ELISA assay

Pages
57–60
Publication Date
2018-08-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

ELISA method cannot be recommended as a reference method for evaluation of the compliance with the regulations, but it can serve as a practical alternative to be used as an online monitoring tool in production lines for raw and mildly processed foods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Genetic modification (GM) techniques have been an important research area of food and feed industry since the 19th century.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this, flour mixtures containing 0.5%, 1%, 5%, 10%, 100% were prepared by mixing the appropriate amount of RUR-GM and non GM standard soy flour and main processing techniques most used in the food industry (baking, autoclaving and freezing) were applied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:ELISA method cannot be recommended as a reference method for evaluation of the compliance with the regulations, but it can serve as a practical alternative to be used as an online monitoring tool in production lines for raw and mildly processed foods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) · GM soy · ELISA

Abstract

Genetic modification (GM) techniques have been an important research area of food and feed industry since the 19th century. There is a strong consumer concern over genetically modified organisms (GMOs) because of their potential risks on health and environment. For this purpose, various countries including Turkey have released labelling regulations for products derived from GMOs. These legal enforcements brought the necessity for reliable detection methods. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of processing on the detection possibility of GMOs by using a commercial Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent (ELISA) assay. For this, flour mixtures containing 0.5%, 1%, 5%, 10%, 100% were prepared by mixing the appropriate amount of RUR-GM and non GM standard soy flour and main processing techniques most used in the food industry (baking, autoclaving and freezing) were applied. According to our results, the detection of GMOs was possible at all concentrations of autoclaved and frozen samples. In dry heated samples, GMOs could not be detected containing below 5% GMOs. ELISA method cannot be recommended as a reference method for evaluation of the compliance with the regulations, but it can serve as a practical alternative to be used as an online monitoring tool in production lines for raw and mildly processed foods.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARUN, Ö. Ö., EKER, F. Y., MURATOĞLU, K. (2018). The effect of processing factors on detection of genetically modified soy in flour by ELISA assay. Journal of Istanbul Veterinary Sciences, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 57–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/225558

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ahmed, F. E. (2002). Detection of genetically modified organisms in foods. Trends in Biotechnology, 20 (5), 215-223.
  2. Anklam, E., Gadani, F., Heinze, P., Pijnenburg, H., Eede, G. V. D. (2002). Analytical methods for detection and determination of genetically modified organisms in agricultural crops and plant-derived food products. European Food Research and Technology, 214, 3-26.
  3. Anonymous (2003). Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC. Official Journal L, 268, 0024-0028.
  4. Anonymous (2009).
  5. Regulation of the Turkish Republic, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs on; import, export, processing, control and monitoring of Genetically Modified Organisms and their products used as food and feed. Official Journal, 27388/Issue date: 26.10.2009.
  6. Anonymous (2010). Turkish Republic Biosafety Low: Low number 5977. Official Journal, 27533/Issue date: 26.03.2010.
  7. Anonymous (2018). GM Approval Database. http://www.isaaa.org Issue date: 30.04.2018.
  8. Aono, M., Akiyama, S., Nagatsu, M., Nakajima, N., Tamaoki, M., Kubo, A., Saji, H. (2006). Detection of feral transgenic oilseed rape with multiple herbicide resistance in Japan. Environmental Biosafety Research, 5, 77-87.
  9. Arun Ozgen, O., Garrett, S. (2009). GMO Detection in Commercial Heat Processed Food Products. In Abstract, 3rd National Veterinary Food Hygiene Congress, p: 20, Bursa, Turkey. Arun Özgen, Ö., Muratoğlu, K., Yılmaz Eker, F. (2015). Genetiği Değiştirilmiş Organizmalar Kavramına Genel Bakış. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 41 (1), 113-123.
  10. Arun Özgen, Ö., Muratoğlu, K., Yılmaz Eker, F. (2016). The Effect of Heat Processing on Pcr Detection of Genetically Modified Soy in Bakery Products. Journal of Food and Health Science, 2 (3), 130-139.
  11. Asensio, L., González, I., García, T., Martín, R. (2008). Determination of food authenticity by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Food Control, 19 (1), 1-8.Ballari, R. V., Martin, A. (2013). Assessment of DNA degradation induced by thermal and UV radiation processing: Implications for quantification of genetically modified organisms. Food Chemistry, 141, 2130-2136. Bergerová, E., Hrnčírová, Z., Stankovská, M, Lopašovská, M., Siekel, P. (2010). Effect of Thermal Treatment on the Amplification and Quanti