Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2011 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4

The evaluation of coronal and sagittal plane of the lenke type III scoliosis patients treated with posterior segmenter instrumentation

Segmenter posterior enstrümantasyon uygulanan lenke tip 3 adölesan idiopatik skolyozlarda koronal ve sagittal değerlendirme

Pages
233–244
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, segmenter posterior instrumentation and fusion were sucsessfull in the treatment of Lenke type 3 AIS to achieve a significant correction degrees and stability in coronal and sagittal plane and to prevent from decompenzation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, patients (21 female, 5 male, mean age 15±2 years, mean follow-up period 60±22 months) with Lenke type 3 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated with long segmental posterior instrumentation and fusion between the years 2000-2008 were evaluated retrospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the final follow-up, coronal and sagittal correction losses and balance were evaluated and SRS- 30 form was used for clinical evaluation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, segmenter posterior instrumentation and fusion were sucsessfull in the treatment of Lenke type 3 AIS to achieve a significant correction degrees and stability in coronal and sagittal plane and to prevent from decompenzation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, patients (21 female, 5 male, mean age 15±2 years, mean follow-up period 60±22 months) with Lenke type 3 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated with long segmental posterior instrumentation and fusion between the years 2000-2008 were evaluated retrospectively. Proximal thoracic, main thoracic, and lumbar/thoracolumbar Cobb angles, apical vertebral rotations (AVR), apical vertebra translations (AVT), kyphosis, lordosis and vertebral balance were evaluated in anterior-posterior (AP), lateral, traction and bending x-rays. In the early postoperative period, correction ratios, the amount of compensation, AVT, AVR, kyphosis, lordosis and vertebral balance were evaluated. In the final follow-up, coronal and sagittal correction losses and balance were evaluated and SRS- 30 form was used for clinical evaluation. Preoperative mean thoracic Cobb angle was 51° and mean lumbar Cobb angle was 44°. Early postoperative mean correction ratio was measured as 73 %, lumbar/thoracolumbar correction ratio as 77 %; in the last follow-up the mean correction losses were measured as 3 % in the thoracic region and 5 % in the lumbar region. In the sagittal and coronal planes, all cases were found within balance limits. There were no neurological deficits, pseudarthrosis and deep infections in any of our patients. According to SRS-30, total average was measured as 3,8. As a result, segmenter posterior instrumentation and fusion were sucsessfull in the treatment of Lenke type 3 AIS to achieve a significant correction degrees and stability in coronal and sagittal plane and to prevent from decompenzation.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, 2000-2008 yılları arasında uzun segment posterior enstrümantasyon ve füzyon ile tedavi edilmiş, Lenke Tip 3 çift majör adölesan idiopatik skolyozlu hastalar (21 kadın, 5 erkek, ortalama yaş 15±2, ortalama postoperatif takip 60±22 ay) retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmiştir. AP, lateral, traksiyon ve yana eğilme grafilerinde, proksimal torasik, ana torasik, lomber / torakolomber Cobb açılar, apikal vertebral rotasyon (AVR), apikal vertebral rotasyon (AVT), kifoz, lordoz ve denge değerlendirildi. Erken postoperatif dönemde, korreksiyon oranları, kompanzasyon, AVT, AVR, kifoz, lordoz ve denge ölçümleri yapıldı. Son kontrolde, koronal ve sagittal korreksiyon kayıpları ve denge değerlendirildi. Son kontrolde klinik değerlendirme için SRS-30 formu kullanıldı. Preoperatif torasik Cobb açısı ortalama 51°, lomber Cobb açısı ortalama 44°, erken postoperatif ortalama korreksiyon oranı % 73, lomber/torakolomber korreksiyon oranı 77° olarak ölçüldü. Son kontrolde, korreksiyon kayıpları torakal bölgede ortalama % 3, lomber bölgede ortalama % 5 olarak ölçüldü. Sagittal ve koronal planda tüm vakalar denge sınırları içinde bulundu. Vakaların hiçbirinde nörolojik defisit, psödoartroz ve derin enfeksiyon rastlanmadı. SRS-30ʼa göre total ortalama 3.8 olarak ölçüldü. Sonuç olarak, segmenter posterior enstrümantasyon ve posterior füzyon yaklaşımla Lenke Tip III eğriliklerde koronal ve sagittal planda önemli derecede korreksiyon sağlamakta olup, dekompanzasyon oranlarının da oldukça düşük olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUYMUŞ, T. M., ÜZÜMCÜGİL, O., YALÇINKAYA, M., ÖZTÜRKMEN, Y., KARADENİZ, H., CANİKOĞLU, M. (2011). The evaluation of coronal and sagittal plane of the lenke type III scoliosis patients treated with posterior segmenter instrumentation. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4, 233–244. https://ajindex.com/articles/271571

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Barr SJ, Schuette AM, Emans JB. Lumbar pedicle screws versus hooks. Results in double major curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1997; 22: 1369–1379
  2. Bartie BJ, Lonstein JE, Winter RB. Long-term follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who had Harrington instrumentation and fusion to the lower lumbar vertebrae: is low back pain a problem? Spine 2009; 34(24): E873-878
  3. Behensky H, Giesinger K, Ogon M, Krismer M. Multi surgeon assessment of coronal pattern classification systems of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Reliability and error analysis. Spine 2002; 16: 769–777
  4. Bridwell KH. Spine update. Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The basics and the controversies. Spine 1994; 19: 1095–1100
  5. Bridwell KH, Betz RR, Capelli AM, Huss G, Harvey C. Sagittal plane analysis in idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation. Spine 1990; 15: 921 926
  6. Bridwell KH, Mc Allister JW, Betz RR, Huss G, Clancy M, Schoenecker PL. Coronal decompensation produced by Cotrel–Dubousset ʻderotationʼ maneuver for idiopathic right thoracic scoliosis. Spine 1991; 16: 769–777
  7. Cobb JR. Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop Surg Lect 5:261–275 fusion. Spine 1948; 17(8 Suppl): 274–281
  8. Cochran T, Irstam L, Nachmenson A. Longterm anatomic and functional changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by Harrington rod fusion. Spine 1983; 8: 576-584
  9. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M. New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop 1988; 227: 10–23
  10. Cummings RJ, Loveless EA, Campbell J, Samelson S, Mazur J. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the system of King et al. for the classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80-A: 1107–1111
  11. De Longe T, Dubousset J, Illes T. Sagittal plane correction in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2002; 27(7): 754-760 12. Hannes BA, Ashley AC, OʼBrian JC, Freeman AMP, Grevitt AHS, Mehdian AJK. Webb Fixed lumbar apical vertebral rotation predicts spinal decompensation in lenke type 3c adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after selective posterior thoracic correction and fusion. Eur Spine J 2007; 16: 1570–1578
  12. Harrington PR. Treatment of scoliosis: correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg 1962
  13. A: 591–610
  14. Howard B, Yeon AJ, Weinberg AV, Arlet AJA, Ouelett AKB. Anterior lumbar instrumentation improves correction of