SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2008 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

The effects of interspinous wiring technique on the biomechanical properties of interspinous and supraspinous ligaments of the spine: An invitro study

İnterspinöz telleme yönteminin omurganın interspinöz ve supraspinöz ligamentlerinin biyomekanik özellikleri üzerine etkisi: İnvitro bir çalışma

Erhan SESLİ
ANIL MURAT ÖZTÜRK
Cengizhan KURT
Bülent ULUBAY
Halit ÖZYALÇIN
Pages
81–88
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results demonstrated statistically significant difference between the groups (p<0,05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Several in vitro biomechanical studies about posterior ligaments of the spine performed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to investigate the strength of interspinous wiring technique in mature sheep lumbar vertebraes in vitro. 24 sheep lumbar vertebraes divided into 3 groups as; posterior spinal ligaments intact, sacrified and fixed with interspinous wiring, and these groups tested biomechanically.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results demonstrated statistically significant difference between the groups (p<0,05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:8 specimens
⚙️Variables:Servikal omurga · In vitro · Ortopedik fiksasyon araçları

Abstract

Several in vitro biomechanical studies about posterior ligaments of the spine performed. These studies showed that posterior ligaments of the spine support spinal stability and play an important role in restricting spinal motion. The aim of this study is to investigate the strength of interspinous wiring technique in mature sheep lumbar vertebraes in vitro. 24 sheep lumbar vertebraes divided into 3 groups as; posterior spinal ligaments intact, sacrified and fixed with interspinous wiring, and these groups tested biomechanically. Each 8 specimens compressed with testing machine and breaking forces were analyzed statistically. The resistance and changes for flexion forces saved in each groups. The mean forces at breaking point were 167,65 N in group 1, 66,36 N in group 2 and 242,87 N in group 3. The results demonstrated statistically significant difference between the groups (p<0,05). According to these datas, we thought that the fixation with interspinous cerclage wiring could support the resistance of spinal segment for flexion forces in ruptured posterior ligament complex of vertebraes.

Özet

Posterior ligaman kompleksi ile ilgili birçok invitro biomekanik inceleme yapılmıştır. Tüm bu incelemelerde, vertebra stabilitesinde posterior ligaman kompleksinin sağlamlığının önemli olduğu bildirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada, koyun vertebraları arasındaki interspinöz ligamanları sağlam ve yırtık olup telle bağlanmış olan grupları karşılaştırarak, interspinöz telleme yönteminin dayanıklılığı invitro olarak test edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla 24 koyun lomber vertebrası invitro olarak biyomekanik teste tabi tutulmuş, örnekler sağlam, posterior ligamanları sakrifiye edilmiş ve interspinöz bölgeden telleme tekniği ile tespit edilmiş grup olmak üzere 3 gruba ayrılmıştır. Her grupta bulunan 8’er örnek test makinesi ile kompresyon testine tabi tutulmuş, kırılma güçleri saptanarak istatistiksel olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Her gruptaki fleksiyon güçlerine karşı direnç ve değişiklikler kaydedilmiştir. Kırılma noktasındaki güç 1. grupta ortalama 167,65 N, 2. grupta 66,36 N ve 3. grupta 242,87 N olarak saptanmıştır. Bu sonuçların birbirinden istatisitiksel olarak anlamlı olacak şekilde farklı olduğu belirlenmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

SESLİ, E., ÖZTÜRK, A. M., KURT, C., ULUBAY, B., ÖZYALÇIN, H. (2008). The effects of interspinous wiring technique on the biomechanical properties of interspinous and supraspinous ligaments of the spine: An invitro study. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 81–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/271509

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abitbol JJ, Zdeblick TA, Kunz D et al. A biomechanical analysis of modern anterior and posterior cervical stabilization techniques. Orthop Trans 1994; 18: 338
  2. Aebi M, Mohler J, Zach GA, Morscher E. Indication, surgical technique, and results of 100 surgically-treated fractures and fracturedislocations of the cervical spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 203: 244-257
  3. Coe JD, Warden KE, Sutterlin CE 3rd, McAfee PC. Biomechanical evaluation of cervical spinal stabilization methods in a human cadaveric model. Spine 1989; 14 (10): 1122-1131
  4. Comarr AE, Kaufman AA. A survey of the neurological results of 858 spinal cord injuries; a comparison of patients treated with and without laminectomy. J Neurosurg 1956; 13 (1): 95-106
  5. Davey JR, Rorabeck CH, Bailey SI, Bourne RB, Dewar FP. A technique of posterior cervical fusion for instability of the cervical spine. Spine 1985; 10(8): 722-728
  6. Edwards CC, Matx SO, Levine AM. The oblique wiring technique for rotational injuries of the cervical spine: Scientific exhibit. 49th annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. New Orleans, LA, January 23, 1982
  7. Eismont FJ, Bohlman HH. Posterior methylmethacrylate fixation for cervical trauma. Spine 1981; 6 (4): 347-353
  8. Feldborg Nielsen C, Annertz M, Persson L, Wingstrand H, Saveland H, Brandt L. Posterior wiring without bony fusion in traumatic distractive flexion injuries of the mid to lower cervical spine. Long-term follow-up in 30 patients. Spine 1991;16 (4): 467-472
  9. Hambly M, Lee CK, Gutteling E, Zimmerman MC, Langrana N, Pyun Y. Tension band wiring-bone grafting for spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. A clinical and biomechanical study. Spine 1989;14(4): 455-460. 10.Hasberry S, Pearcy MJ. Temperature dependence of the tensile properties of interspinous ligaments of sheep. J Biomed Eng 1986; 8 (1): 62-66. 11.Heller KD, Prescher A, Schneider T, Block FR, Forst R Stability of different wiring techniques in segmental spinal instrumentation. An experimental study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998; 117 (1-2): 96-99. 12.Hindle RJ, Pearcy MJ, Cross A. Mechanical function of the human lumbar interspinous and supraspinous ligaments. J Biomed Eng 1990; 12(4): 340-344. 13.Holdsworth FW. Fracture, dislocations, and fracture-dislocations of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg 1963; 45-B: 6-20. 14.McAfee PC, Bohlman HH, Wilson WL. The triple wire fixation technique for stabilization of acute cervical fracture dislocations: a biomechanical analysis. Orth