Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2011 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Percutaneous kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty treatment for osteoporotic vertebral fractures

Ostoporotik vertebra kırıklarının perkutan vertebroplasti ve kifoplasti ile tedavisi

Pages
187–193
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

But the patient satisfaction was decreased when kyphoplasty was performed six months after trauma.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To investigate the treatment results of percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures Method: 13 patients who was treated and follow-up between 2007-2010 years were included.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The subjects consisted of 3 men and 10 women, the mean age was 73.6 (60-90).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:But the patient satisfaction was decreased when kyphoplasty was performed six months after trauma.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007-2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the treatment results of percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures Method: 13 patients who was treated and follow-up between 2007-2010 years were included. The subjects consisted of 3 men and 10 women, the mean age was 73.6 (60-90). The causes of the injury were falls in 9 patients and lifting heavy objects in 4 patients. The fractures were distributed as follows; 2 thoracic, 10 thoracolumbar, 1 lumbar. 4 patients were treated with vertebroplasty and 9 patients were treated with kyphoplasty. Clinical (Oswestry Disability index, Visual analog score (VAS)) and radiologic (Sugita) outcomes were analyzed. Results: The mean follow-up time was 16 months (9-30), the time between trauma and surgery was 4.1 months (0.1-19). Clinically, there was very significant difference between preoperative and postoperative VAS scores (p=0.002). Radiological, fractures were consist of 6 concave-type, 3 bow-shapedtype, 2 projecting-type and 2 swelled-fronttype. Vacuum phenomenon visualized at four patients by computerized tomography. There were four complications including cement leakage without neurologic compromise, revision because of intractable pain and corpus fracture. Postoperative Oswestry and VAS scores of three cases that kyphoplasty was performed six month after trauma when compared with remaining 10 patients, patient satisfaction was significantly deteriorated in the late-onset cases (p=0.013 and p=0.017). Conclusion: Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty procedure for osteoporotic vertebral fractures are clinically and radiological good and effective methods. But the patient satisfaction was decreased when kyphoplasty was performed six months after trauma.

Özet

Amaç: Osteoporotik vertebra kırıklarının perkütan vertebroplasti ve kifoplasti ile tedavi sonuçlarının incelenmesi. Metod: 2007-2010 yılları arası tedavi ve takibi yapılan 13 hasta değerlendirmeye alındı. Hastaların üçü erkek, onu kadın ve ortalama yaşı 73.6 (60-90) idi. Oluş nedeni 9 hastada düşme, dört hastada yük kaldırması sonrasıydı. Kırık seviyesi iki hastada torakal, 10 hastada torakolomber ve bir hastada lomber seviyeydi. 4 hastaya vertebroplasti uygulanırken 9 hastaya kifoplasti yapıldı. Klinik olarak Oswestry indeksi ve Visüel analog skor (VAS) ile, radyolojik olarak ise Sugita sınıflaması ile hastalar değerlendirildi. Sonuçlar: Ortalama takip süresi 16 ay (9-30), travma oluşu ile ameliyat arası geçen süre 4.1 ay (0.1-19) olarak bulundu. Klinik olarak ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası VAS skorları arasında ileri derecede anlamlı fark bulundu (p=0.002). Radyolojik olarak 6 hastada içbükey, üç hastada yay, iki hastada çıkıntılı ve iki hastada önü şiş tip kırık mevcuttu. 4 hastada bilgisayarlı tomografi ile vakum fenomeni görüldü. Komplikasyon olarak dört hastada nörolojik defisit içermeyen sement kaçağı, ağrı geçmediği için revizyon ve korpus kırığı görüldü. Travma operasyon arası geçen zaman 6 ay ve daha fazla olan üç kifoplasti uygulanan hasta ile daha kısa olan 10 hastanın ameliyat sonrası VAS ve Oswestry değerleri karşılaştırıldığında, geç ameliyat yapılan olgularda memnuniyetin anlamlı olarak kötü olduğu gözlendi (p=0.013 ve p=0.017). Çıkarımlar: Osteoporotik omurga kırıklarında perkütan vertebroplasti ve kifoplasti uygulaması klinik ve radyografik olarak etkin, iyi yöntemlerdir. Fakat kırıktan 6 ay ya da daha sonra yapılan kifoplasti uygulamalarında hasta memnuniyeti azalmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

UĞRAŞ, A. A., SUNGUR, İ., KAYA, İ., YÜCEL, B., ÇETİNUS, E. (2011). Percutaneous kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty treatment for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 187–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/271426

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Kasperk C, Hillmeier J, Nöldge G, Grafe IA, Dafonseca K, Raupp D, Bardenheuer H, Libicher M, Liegibel UM, Sommer U, Hilscher U, Pyerin W, Vetter M, Meinzer HP, Meeder PJ, Taylor RS, Nawroth P. Treatment of painful vertebral fractures by kyphoplasty in patients with primary osteoporosis: a prospective nonrandomized controlled study. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20(4): 604-612
  2. Kim DH, Vaccaro AR.Osteoporotic compression fractures of the spine; current options and considerations for treatment.Spine J 2006; 6(5): 479-487
  3. Krueger A, Bliemel C, Zettl R, Ruchholtz S. Management of pulmonary cement embolism after percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2009; 18(9): 1257-1265
  4. Lieberman IH, Dudeney S, Reinhardt MK, Bell G. Initial outcome and efficacy of "kyphoplasty" in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 2001; 26(14): 1631-1638
  5. Lovi A, Teli M, Ortolina A, Costa F, Fornari M, Brayda-Bruno M. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: complementary techniques for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. A prospective nonrandomised study on 154 patients. Eur Spine J 2009;18 Suppl 1: 95-101
  6. Masala S, Mastrangeli R, Petrella MC, Massari F, Ursone A, Simonetti G. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in 1,253 levels: results and longterm effectiveness in a single centre.Eur Radiol 2009; 19(1): 165-171
  7. Mathis JM, Ortiz AO, Zoarski GH. Vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty: a comparison and contrast. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25(5): 840-845
  8. Movrin I, Vengust R, Komadina R. Adjacent vertebral fractures after percutaneous vertebral augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a comparison of balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010; 130(9): 1157-1166
  9. Pitton MB, Herber S, Koch U, Oberholzer K, Drees P, Düber C. CT-guided vertebroplasty: analysis of technical results, extraosseous cement leakages, and complications in 500 procedures. Eur Radiol 2008; 18(11): 2568- 2578
  10. Sugita M,Watanabe N, Mikami Y, Hase H, Kubo T. Classification of vertebral compression fractures in the osteoporotic spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005; 18(4): 376-381
  11. Zou J, Mei X, Gan M, Wang G, Lu J, Yang H. Is kyphoplasty reliable for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture with vertebral wall deficiency? Injury 2010; 41(4): 360-364.