Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2011 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Dejeneratif lomber stenozda sınırlı laminektomi ve selektif dekompresyon

Limited laminotomy and selective decompression in degenerative lumbar stenosis

Pages
119–126
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, a total number of 67 decompressions were performed. 26 (57.8%) patients were decompressed at one level, 16 (35.5%) at two levels, and 3 (6.7%) at three levels.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Degenerative lumbar stenosis is defined as narrowing of the spinal canal with symptomatic compression of neural and vascular elements.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 45 (38 female, 7 male) patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis who underwent decompressive surgery between 2003 and 2007.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, a total number of 67 decompressions were performed. 26 (57.8%) patients were decompressed at one level, 16 (35.5%) at two levels, and 3 (6.7%) at three levels.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Degenerative lumbar stenosis is defined as narrowing of the spinal canal with symptomatic compression of neural and vascular elements. Consequently, persistent back pain and neurological symptoms becomes the indications for surgical treatment. The aim of the study is to evaluate the outcome of limited laminotomy and selective decompression in comparison to standard laminectomy and wide decompression in patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 45 (38 female, 7 male) patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis who underwent decompressive surgery between 2003 and 2007. Standard laminectomy was performed in 31 patients, and limited laminotomy in 14 patients. Radiographic evaluation was performed using anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique radiographs. Any concomitant instability was assessed with additional dynamic lateral flexion and extension radiographs. Magnetic resonance imaging was used in all patients to demonstrate and evaluate the level and degree of stenosis. VAS was used tomeasure pain while walking and during daily activities and pain at rest and night. Results: The mean age was 62.8 years (37- 80) at surgery. Overall, a total number of 67 decompressions were performed. 26 (57.8%) patients were decompressed at one level, 16 (35.5%) at two levels, and 3 (6.7%) at three levels. A mean of 5.3 (2-15) segments were fused in limited laminotomy group, and amean of 4.6 (3-9) segments in standard decompressive laminectomy group. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 45.7 months (8-84). VAS results improved from 8.5 to 2.2 at limited laminotomy group, and from 8 to 3.5 at wide decompression group. We have one surgery related complication as intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage. No other complications occurred during follow-up period for two groups. Conclusion: Limited laminotomy is an effective method for surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis. It provides adequate decompression and pain relief and improves quality of life.

Özet

Giriş: Dejeneratif lomber dar kanal hastalığı, daralan kanal içinde nöral ve damarsal yapıların sıkışması ile karakterizedir. İlk tedavi yaklaşımı konservatif olmalıdır. Konservatif tedaviye rağmen devam eden bel ağrıları, nörolojik yakınma ve bulgular durumunda cerrahi tedaviye başvurulmaktadır. Çalışmamızın amacı sınırlı laminotomi ile sağlanan dekompresyonun etkinliğini ve sonuçlarını, standart laminektomi ve dekompresyon sonuçlarıyla karşılaştırılarak değerlendirmektir . Hastalar ve Yöntem: 2003-2007 yılları arasında, dejeneratif lomber dar kanal nedeniyle cerrahi tedavi uygulanmış, 38 kadın, 7 erkek toplam 45 hasta çalışmaya alındı. 31 hastada klasik standart laminektomi, 14 hastada sınırlı laminotomi ile dekompresyon yapıldı. Radyolojik değerlendirmede ön-arka, yan ve oblik radyografiler çekildi. İnstabilite varlığını araştırmak için fleksiyonda ve ekstansiyonda dinamik yan radyografiler çekildi. Cerrahi tedavi öncesinde darlık seviyeleri ve derecesi manyetik rezonans görüntüleme ile araştırıldı. Hastaların ağrılarının değerlendirilmesi için, aktivite ve istirahat halindeki VAS değerleri kullanıldı. Sonuç: Cerrahi sırasındaki ortalama yaş 62.8 (37-80) yıl idi. Her iki grupta toplam 67 seviyedeki darlığa cerrahi müdahale uygulandı. 26 (%57,8) hastada tek seviye, 16 (%35,5) hastada iki seviye ve 3 (%6,7) hastada üç seviye cerrahi uygulandı. Sınırlı laminotomi uygulanan grupta ortalama 5,3 (2-15) omur füzyonu yapılırken, standart laminektomi grubunda 4.6 (3-9) omur füzyonu yapıldı. Cerrahi sonrası ortalama takip süresi 45.7 (8- 84) ay olarak hesaplandı. Sınırlı laminotomi grubunda cerrahi sonrası VAS değerleri 8,5ʼtan 2,2ʼye gerilemişken, standart laminektomi grubunda bu değer 8ʼden 3,5ʼa verileceği görüldü. Standart laminektomi uygulanan bir hastada iyatrojenik dura yaralanması gözlendi. Takipler sırasında her iki grupta da başka bir komplikasyon görülmedi. Tartışma: Lomber dar kanal tedavisinde sınırlı laminotomi başarılı bir cerrahi tedavi yöntemidir. Sınırlı laminotomi ile yeterli dekompresyon sağlanabilmekte ve yüksek oranda hasta memnuniyeti sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİKİCİ, F., AKGÜL, T., YILDIZ, F., TALU, U., DOMANİÇ, Ü. (2011). Dejeneratif lomber stenozda sınırlı laminektomi ve selektif dekompresyon. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 119–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/271425

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abumi K, Panjabi MM, Kramer KM, Duranceu J, Oxland T, Crisco JJ. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spine stability after graded facetectomies. Spine 1990; 15: 1142–1147
  2. Aryanpur J, Ducker T. Multilevel lumbar laminotomies: An alternative to laminectomy in the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery 1990; 26: 429-433
  3. Asgarzadie F, Khoo LT Minimally invasive operative management for lumbar spinal stenosis: overview of early and long-term outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am 2007; 38: 387- 399
  4. Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Eisenberg BA, Baldus CR, Lenke L. Minimum five-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and instrumented posterior fusion.Spine 1999; 24: 1721–1727
  5. Cavuşoğlu H, Türkmenoğlu O, Kaya RA, Tuncer C, Colak I, Sahin Y, Aydin Y. Efficacy of unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis. Turkish Neurosurgery 2007; 17: 100-108
  6. Dall BE, Rowe DE. Degenerative spondylolisthesis: Its surgical management. Spine 1985; 10: 668–672
  7. Gelalis ID, Arnaoutoglou C, Christoforou G, Lykissas MG, Batsilas I, Xenakis T. Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2010; 44: 235-240
  8. Getty CJM. Lumbar spinal stenosis: the clinical spectrum and the results of operation. J Bone Joint Surg 1980; 62: 481–485
  9. Guiot BH, Khoo LT, Fessler RG. A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine.Spine 2002; 27(4): 432-438
  10. Haher TR, OʼBrien M, Dryer JW, Nucci R, Zipnick R, Leone DJ. The role of the lumbar facet joints in spinal stability—identification of alternative paths of loading.Spine 1994; 19: 2667–2671
  11. Hall S, Bartleson JD, Onofrio BM, Baker HL Jr., Okazaki H, OʼDuffy JD. Lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical features, diagnostic procedures, and results of surgical treatment in 68 patients. Ann Intern Med 1985; 103: 271–275
  12. Herkowitz HN, Garfin SR. Decompression surgery for spinal stenosis. Spine Surg 1989; 1: 163–167
  13. Herron LD, Mangelsdorf C. Lumbar stenosis; results of surgical treatment. J Spinal Disord 1991; 4: 26-33
  14. Hong SW, Choi KY, Ahn Y, Baek OK, Wang JC, Lee SH, Lee HY. A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4- L5 spinal stenosis.Spine 2011; 36: 172-178
  15. Iguchi, T, Kurihara A, Nakayama J, Sato K, Kurosaka M, Yamasaki K. Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressi