SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

THE RATIO OF RECURRENT DISC HERNIATIONS IN POSTERIOR THORACIC AND LUMBAR FUSION SURGERIES

Veysel ANTAR
Pages
193–196
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: It is spectacular that the ratio of recurrent disc herniation is more than listhesis and fracture surgeries in posterior thoracic-lumbar instrumentation surgeries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of our study is to evaluate the ratio of recurrent disc herniation in posterior thoracic-lumbar fusion surgeries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mean age of the study group was 56.3 ± 14.2 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: It is spectacular that the ratio of recurrent disc herniation is more than listhesis and fracture surgeries in posterior thoracic-lumbar instrumentation surgeries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of our study is to evaluate the ratio of recurrent disc herniation in posterior thoracic-lumbar fusion surgeries. Materials and Method: We evaluate the ratio of recurrent disc herniation in posterior thoracic-lumbar fusion surgeries. The patient files and radio-diagnostic images were inspected retrospectively. Simple microdiscectomies lateral and anterior thoracic-lumbar stabilization surgeries were excluded. Results: One hundred ninety one patients were included in the study. Mean age of the study group was 56.3 ± 14.2 years. M/F was 48.2 / 51.8. Mean age was 53.6 years for males, and 58.8 years for women (p=0.06). Most frequent diagnosis was stenosis (n=117, 61.3 %), and recurrence was present in 14.7 % of the cases (n=28). Revision operation was performed in 6.8 % of patients. The comparisons between genders revealed that stenosis rates were higher in females, and fracture rates were higher in males (p=0.003). However, rates of revision operations were similar between males and females (p=0.445). Most frequent level of recurrent disc herniation were L4-L5 (78.57 %). Conclusions: It is spectacular that the ratio of recurrent disc herniation is more than listhesis and fracture surgeries in posterior thoracic-lumbar instrumentation surgeries.

🔖

Cite This Article

ANTAR, V. (2018). THE RATIO OF RECURRENT DISC HERNIATIONS IN POSTERIOR THORACIC AND LUMBAR FUSION SURGERIES. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 193–196. https://ajindex.com/articles/271370

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ambrossi GLG, McGirt MJ, Sciubba DM. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after single-level lumbar discec- tomy: incidence and health care cost analysis. Neurosur- gery 2009; 65(3): 574–578.
  2. Cinotti G, Roysam GS, Eisenstein SM, Postacchini F. Ipsilateral recurrent lumbar disc herniation, J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80-B(5): 825–832.
  3. Dower A, Chatterji R, Swart A, Winder MJ. Surgical management of recurrent lumbar disc herniation and the role of fusion. J Clin Neurosci 2016; 23: 44–50.
  4. Drazin D, Ugiliweneza B, Al-Khouja L. Treatment of recurrent disc herniation: a systematic review. Cureus 2016; 8(5): 622. El Shazly AA, El Wardany MA, Morsi AM. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a prospective comparative study of three surgical management procedures. Asian J Neuro- surg 2013; 8(3): 139–146.
  5. Fu TS, Lai PL, Tsai TT, Niu CC, Chen LH, Chen WJ. Long-term results of disc excision for recurrent lumbar disc herniation with or without posterolateral fusion. Spine 2005; 30(24): 2830–2834.
  6. Fritzell P, Knutsson B, Sanden B, Strömqvist B, Hägg O. Recurrent versus primary lumbar disc herniation surgery: patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish spine register swespine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(6): 1978–1984.
  7. Ghogawala Z, Whitmore RG, Watters WCII. Guide- line update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 3: assessment of economic outcome. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 21(1): 14–22.
  8. Guan J, Ravindra VM, Schmidt MH, Dailey AT, Hood RS, Bisson EF. Comparing clinical outcomes of repeat discectomy versus fusion for recurrent disc herniation utilizing the N2QOD. J Neurosurg Spine 2017; 26(1): 39-44.
  9. Kerezoudis P, Goncalves S, Cesare JD, Alvi MA, Kurian DP, Sebastian AS, Nassr A, Bydon M. Comparing out- comes of fusion versus repeat discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: A systematic review and me- ta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2018; 29(171): 70-78.
  10. Mroz TE, Lubelski D, Williams SK, O’Rourke C, Obuchowski NA, Wang JC, Steinmetz MP, Melillo AJ, Benzel EC, Modic MT, Quencer RM. Differences in the surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc hernia- tion among spine surgeons in the United States. Spine J 2014; 14(10): 2334-2343.
  11. Ozgen S, Naderi S, Ozek MM, Pamir MN. Findings and outcome of revision lumbar disc surgery, J Spinal Disord 1999; 12(4): 287–292.
  12. Özdoğan S, Yaltirik CK, Yilmaz SG, Koçak A, Isbir T. Association of rs2228570 Polymorphism of Vitamin D Receptor Gene with Lumbar Degenerative Disc Dis- ease. Turk Neuro