SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

EFFECTS OF LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY ON SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS

ÜMİT ALİ MALÇOK
Ali AKAR
Pages
32–37
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, despite LM operation slightly improved spinopelvic parameters in the first month, there was not a significant change overall.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: One of the causes which accelerates spinal degeneration process is lumbar disc hernia (LDH).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Standardized bilateral standing scoliosis radiography images of 19 patients, which were performed before and 1 month after LM operation, were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, despite LM operation slightly improved spinopelvic parameters in the first month, there was not a significant change overall.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: One of the causes which accelerates spinal degeneration process is lumbar disc hernia (LDH). In this study, we observed the changes in spinopelvic parameters one month after single-level lumbar microdiscectomy (LM). Materials and Methods: Standardized bilateral standing scoliosis radiography images of 19 patients, which were performed before and 1 month after LM operation, were evaluated retrospectively. Sagittal vertical axis and coronal vertical axis distances, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, sacral slope and pelvic tilt angles were measured with Surgimap software. Results: There was a positive correlation between pre-and post-LM values of all spinopelvic parameters included in the study. In comparative tests however, the difference was found to be not statistically significant. As a result, despite LM operation slightly improved spinopelvic parameters in the first month, there was not a significant change overall. Conclusion: LDH is known to worsen the degenerative process in spine. LM as a treatment option is seen to alleviate this degenerative process by slowing down the deterioration in spinopelvic parameters.

🔖

Cite This Article

MALÇOK, Ü. A., AKAR, A. (2021). EFFECTS OF LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY ON SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 32–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/271364

References (14)

  1. Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet. 1999;354:581-5
  2. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Berven S, Glassman S, Hamill C, Horton W, et al. Improvement of back pain with operative and nonoperative treatment in adults with scoliosis. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:86-93
  3. Lagerbäck T, Fritzell P, Hägg O, Nordvall D, Lønne G, Solberg TK, et al. Effectiveness of surgery for sciatica with disc herniation is not substantially affected by differences in surgical incidences among three countries: results from the Danish, Swedish and Norwegian spine registries. Eur Spine J. 2019;28:2562-71
  4. Petit A, Roquelaure Y. Low back pain, intervertebral disc and occupational diseases. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2015;21:15-9
  5. Aebi M. The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2005;14:925-48
  6. Zhang G, Yang Y, Hai Y, Li J, Xie X, Feng S. Analysis of lumbar sagittal curvature in spinal decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis patients under roussouly classification. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:8078641
  7. Jackson RP, Peterson MD, McManus AC, Hales C. Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23:1750-67
  8. Le Huec JC, Thompson W, Mohsinaly Y, Barrey C, Faundez A. Sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J. 2019;28:1889-905
  9. Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S, Hostin R, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, et al. Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multi center analysis. Spine (Phila PA 1976). 2013;38:803-12
  10. Dalbayrak S, Öğrenci A, Akar E, Koban O, Yılmaz A, Yılmaz M. Clinical and radiological outcomes after correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis with dynamic stabilization (with the help of a rigid rod); and describing an alternative technique. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;79:123-8
  11. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:682-8
  12. Mehta VA, Amin A, Omeis I, Gokaslan ZL, Gottfried ON. Implications of spinopelvic alignment for the spine surgeon. Neurosurgery. 2015;76(Suppl 1):42-56
  13. Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL. Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(Suppl 5):609-18
  14. Surgimap, Nemaris, New York, 133 USA. 2019. https://www.surg