SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

COMPARISON OF SPINAL SAGITTAL PARAMETERS BY TIME OF DAY IN A HEALTHY WORKING POPULATION WITH HIGH BODY-MASS INDEX

Okan OZKUNT
Kerim SARIYILMAZ
Halil Cem GEMALMAZ
Pages
83–87
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Routine workload in a hospital environment does not cause significant change in the spinopelvic parameters throughout the day.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Object: To determine the change in spinal sagittal parameters which may occur throughout the day in healthy population with high body-mass index (BMI).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Two standing left lateral ortho-roentgenograms were obtained at 8.00 a.m and at 6.00 p.m.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Routine workload in a hospital environment does not cause significant change in the spinopelvic parameters throughout the day.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Object: To determine the change in spinal sagittal parameters which may occur throughout the day in healthy population with high body-mass index (BMI). Methods: Twenty-one healthy hospital employees with high BMI were enrolled in the study. Two standing left lateral ortho-roentgenograms were obtained at 8.00 a.m and at 6.00 p.m. Six spinopelvic parameters were measured on the X-rays. Results: Twenty-one subjects with a mean age of 32.72± 7.84 were evaluated. No significant change was found between morning and evening measurements for any of the parameters. As a result of the correlation of daily changes for study parameters for the high BMI cohort showed significant direct relationship between SS and PI, LL and SS, LL and PI and an inverse relationship between LL and PI minus LL, SS and PI minus LL. (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Routine workload in a hospital environment does not cause significant change in the spinopelvic parameters throughout the day.

🔖

Cite This Article

OZKUNT, O., SARIYILMAZ, K., GEMALMAZ, H. C. (2018). COMPARISON OF SPINAL SAGITTAL PARAMETERS BY TIME OF DAY IN A HEALTHY WORKING POPULATION WITH HIGH BODY-MASS INDEX. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 83–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/270706

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Bess S, Schwab F, Lafage V, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP. Classifications for adult spinal deformity and use of the Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab Adult Spinal Deformity Classification. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2013; 24(2): 185-193.
  2. Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C, Prat-Pradal D, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Pelissier J. Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 2006; 15(4): 415-422.
  3. Cil A, Yazici M, Uzumcugil A, Kandemir U, Alanay A, Alanay Y, Acaroglu RE, Surat A. The evolution of sagittal segmental alignment of the spine during childhood. Spine 2005; 30(1): 93-100.
  4. Denis F, Sun EC, Winter RB. Incidence and risk factors for proximal and distal junctional kyphosis following surgical treatment for Scheuermann kyphosis: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine 2009; 34(20): E729-734. Diebo BG, Varghese JJ, Lafage R, Schwab FJ, Lafage V. Sagittal alignment of the spine: What do you need to know? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2015; 139: 295-301.
  5. During J, Goudfrooij H, Keessen W, Beeker TW, Crowe A. Toward standards for posture. Postural characteristics of the lower back system in normal and pathologic conditions. Spine 1985; 10(1): 83-87. Farfan HF. Form and function of the musculoskeletal system as revealed by mathematical analysis of the lumbar spine. An essay. Spine 1995; 20(13): 1462-1474.
  6. Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, McEnery KW. An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 1995; 20(12): 1351- 1358. Ghandhari H, Hesarikia H, Ameri E, Noori A. Assessment of normal sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis in children and adolescents. BioMed Res Int 2013; 2013: 842624. Glassman SD, Schwab F, Bridwell KH, Shaffrey C, Horton W, Hu S. Do 1-year outcomes predict 2-year outcomes for adult deformity surgery? Spine J 2009; 9(4): 317-322.
  7. Hammerberg EM, Wood KB. Sagittal profile of the elderly. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 16(1): 44-50.
  8. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cheh G, Baldus C. Results of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. Spine 2007; 32(20): 2189-2197.
  9. La Maida GA, Zottarelli L, Mineo GV, Misaggi B. Sagittal balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: radiographic study of spino-pelvic compensation after surgery. Eur Spine J 2013; 22(Suppl.-6): S859-867. Lafage V, Schwab F, Skalli W, Hawkinson N, Gagey PM, Ondra S, Farcy JP. Standi