Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2017 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

SACRAL FRACTURES AND LUMBOSACRAL DISLOCATION

Pages
265–276
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this paper, the authors aim to share information in the literature along with their experience about anatomy of sacrum and pelvic regions and common sacral fractures, classification of sacral fractures and current therapeutic strategies

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sacrum fractures are injuries with a high rate of mortality and risk of neurological damage usually associated with pelvis fractures and rarely observed as isolated fractures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since it occurs as a result of high energy trauma, concomitant injuries should be suspected.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this paper, the authors aim to share information in the literature along with their experience about anatomy of sacrum and pelvic regions and common sacral fractures, classification of sacral fractures and current therapeutic strategies
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Sacrum fractures are injuries with a high rate of mortality and risk of neurological damage usually associated with pelvis fractures and rarely observed as isolated fractures. Since it occurs as a result of high energy trauma, concomitant injuries should be suspected. Full examination including a detailed neurological and radiological examination is required in order to determine treatment modality. Proper classification of sacral fractures may facilitate determination of optimum treatment modality. Due to the complex nature of the injuries surgical therapeutic options are still being debated. Surgical therapeutic option consisting from decompression of neural structures along with stabilization of the fractures should be considered in patients with neurological deficit, severe soft tissue damage and lumbosacral instability. Percutanous iliosacral screw placement, fixation of posterior sacral tension band and lumbopelvic or triangular fixation techniques are preferred methods. In this paper, the authors aim to share information in the literature along with their experience about anatomy of sacrum and pelvic regions and common sacral fractures, classification of sacral fractures and current therapeutic strategies

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖYÜNCÜ, Y., ÖZKAVAK, İ. O., ÖZDEMİR, H., DABAK, K. (2017). SACRAL FRACTURES AND LUMBOSACRAL DISLOCATION. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 265–276. https://ajindex.com/articles/270699

References (17)

  1. Aihara T, Takahashi K, Yamagata M, Moriya H. Fracturedislocation of the fifth lumbar vertebra. A new classificaiton. J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80-B: 840-845
  2. Anderson S, Biros MH, Reardon RF. Delayed diagnosis of thoracolumbar fractures in multiple-trauma patients. Acad Emerg Med 1996; 3: 832-839
  3. Ayoub MA. Vertically instable sacral fractures with neurological insult: outcomes of surgical decompression and reconstruction plate internal fixation. Int Orthop 2009; 33(1): 261–267
  4. Bellabarba C, McHenry TP. Lumbosacral trauma. In: Baumgaertner MR, Tornetta III P (Eds.), OKU Orthopaedic Knowledge Update, Trauma, AAOS, Rosemont 2005; pp: 337-347
  5. Bellabarba C, Schildhauer TA, Vaccaro AR, Chapman JR. Complications associated with surgical stabilizaiton of high-grade sacral fracture dislocations with spino-pelvic instability. Spine 2006; 31 ( 11 suppl): 80-88
  6. Bents RT, France JC, Glover JM, Kaylor KL. Traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation. A case report and literature review. Spine 1996; 21: 1814-1819
  7. Blauth M, Kathrein A, Mair G. AOSpine Manual Clinical Applications; 2007; pp: 21-41
  8. Bodkin PA, Choksey MS. Management of a sacral fracture with neurological injury. J Orthop Sci 2006; 11(5): 524–528
  9. Chapman JR, Mirza AK. Sacral Fractures. In: Fardon FD, Garfin SR, Abitbol JJ, Boden SD, Herkowitz HN, Mayer T (Eds.), OKU Orthopaedic Knowledge Update- Spine, Rosemont 2002; pp: 279-289
  10. Deniz FE, Zileli M, Çağlı S, Kanyılmaz H. Traumatic L4-5 spondylolisthesis: case report. Eur Spine J 2007; 17 Suppl 2: 232-235
  11. Dennis F, Davis S, Comfort T. Sacral fractures: An important problem. Retrospective analysis of 236 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 227: 67-81
  12. Ebraheim NA, Sabry FF, Tosic A. Radiographic evaluation of transverse sacral fractures. Orthopaedics 2001; 24: 1071- 1074
  13. Fabris D, Costantini S, Nena U, Lo Scalzo V. Traumatic L5-S1 spondylolisthesis: report of three cases and review of the literature. Eur Spine J 1999; 8: 290-295
  14. Finkelstein JA, Hu RW, al Harby T. Open posterior dislocation of the lumbosacral junction. A case report. Spine 1996; 21: 378-380
  15. Gibbons KJ, Soloniuk DS, Razack N. Neurological injury and patterns of sacral fractures. J Neurosurg 1990; 72: 889- 893
  16. Graves VB, Kene JS, Strother CM, Bennett LN, Hackelthorn JC, Houston L. CT of bilateral lumbosacral facet dislocation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1988; 9: 809
  17. Gribnau AJ, van Hensbroke PB, Haverlag R, Ponsen KJ, Been HD, Goslings JC. U