Journals / JAREM / 2015 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Postpartum Dönemde Gelişen Derin Ven Trombozu Vakası

A Case of Deep Vein Thrombosis in the Postpartum Period

Journal
JAREM
Pages
28–30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This case is presented in order to emphasize that hereditary risk factors must be investigated, especially in young patients, although the patient already had an acquired risk factor such as pregnancy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main reason for the increased risk of thromboembolism in pregnancy is hypercoagulability, which has likely evolved to protect women from the bleeding challenges of miscarriage and childbirth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Women are at a 4- to 5-fold increased risk of thromboembolism during pregnancy and the postpartum period compared with when they are not pregnant.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This case is presented in order to emphasize that hereditary risk factors must be investigated, especially in young patients, although the patient already had an acquired risk factor such as pregnancy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main reason for the increased risk of thromboembolism in pregnancy is hypercoagulability, which has likely evolved to protect women from the bleeding challenges of miscarriage and childbirth. Women are at a 4- to 5-fold increased risk of thromboembolism during pregnancy and the postpartum period compared with when they are not pregnant. Risk factors include a history of thrombosis, inherited and acquired thrombophilia, maternal age greater than 35, certain medical conditions, and various complications of pregnancy and childbirth. In this report, a case of a 25-year-old woman diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis in the fourth week of the postpartum period is presented. After the investigating the reasons of deep vein thrombosis, heterozygote factor V Leiden mutation and heterozygote activated protein c resistance were detected. This case is presented in order to emphasize that hereditary risk factors must be investigated, especially in young patients, although the patient already had an acquired risk factor such as pregnancy.

Özet

Gebelikle gelişen tromboembolinin temel nedeninin hiperkoagülobilite olduğu bilinmektedir. Bu durumun düşük tehdidi ve doğumda annenin kanama riskini azaltmaya yönelik olarak geliştiği düşünülmektedir. Kadınlarda tromboemboli riski gebelik ve postpartum dönemde gebe olmayanlara göre 4-5 kat artmaktadır. Derin ven trombozu risk faktörleri arasında önceki tromboz öyküsü, edinsel ya da kalıtsal trombofili, anne yaşının 35'in üstünde olması, gebelik ve doğuma bağlı komplikasyonlar sayılabilir. Bu makalede 25 yaşında, postpartum 4. haftada derin ventrombozu tanısı alan bir olgu sunulmuştur. Etiyolojiye yönelik yapılan tetkiklerinde heterozigot Faktör V Leiden mutasyonu ve heterozigot aktive protein C rezistansı saptandı. Gebelik gibi tromboembolik olaya eğilim oluşturan edinsel bir risk faktörü olmasına rağmen özellikle genç hastalarda kalıtsal risk faktörlerinin mutlaka araştırılması gerektiğini vurgulamak amacıyla sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATALAY, H., TEKER, F., BÖYÜK, B., ÇELEBİ, A., AYAR, Y., EKİZOĞLU, İ. (2015). Postpartum Dönemde Gelişen Derin Ven Trombozu Vakası. JAREM, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 28–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/270401

References (6)

  1. Lindqvist P, Dahlback B, Marsal K. Thrombotic risk duringpregnancy: A population study. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 595-9. [CrossRef] Melis F, Vandenbrouke JP, Buller HR, Colly LP, Bloemenkamp KWM. Estimates of risk of venous thrombosis during pregnancy and puer- perium are not influenced by diagnostic suspicion and referral basis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 825-9. [CrossRef] Won HS, Kim do Y, Yang MS, Lee SJ, Shin HH, Park JB. Pregnancy- induced hypertension, but not gestational diabetes mellitus, is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism in pregnancy. Korean Circ J 2011; 41: 23-7. [CrossRef] Margaglione M, Brancaccio V, De Lucia D, Martinelli I, Ciampa A, Grandone E, et al. Inherited thrombophilic risk factors and venous thromboembolism: distinct role in peripheral deep venous thrombo- sis and pulmonary embolism. Chest 2000; 118: 1405-11. [CrossRef] Legnani C, Palareti G, Guazzaloca G, Cosmi B, Lunghi B, Bernardi F, et al. Venous thromboembolism in youngwomen; role of throm- bophilic mutations and oral contraceptive use. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 984-90. [CrossRef] Sılan F, Zafer C. Faktör V Leiden mutasyonu. Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Der- gisi 2004; 1: 33-6.
  2. Demirel C, Kaya C, Sonmezer M, Soylemez F, Dincer Cengiz S. Fac- tor V leiden mutation in a patient recurrent pregnancy loss and deep vein thrombosis. Turkiye Klinikleri J Gynecol Obst 2003; 13: 62-5. Dahlback B. Physiological anticoagulation. Resistance to activated protein C and venous thromboembolism. J Clin Invest 1994; 94: 923- 7. [CrossRef] Oner F, Kaya A, Dogan R, Numanoglu N. Genetic risk factors of ve- nous thromboembolism. Tuberk Toraks 2003; 51: 60-9.
  3. Irdem A, Devecioglu C, Batun S, Soker M, Sucakli IA. Prevalence of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A gene mutation. Saudi Med J 2005; 26: 580-3.
  4. Gurgey A, Mesci L. The prevalence of factor V Leiden (1691 G-->A) mutation in Turkey. Turk J Pediatr 1997; 39: 313-5.
  5. Akar N, Akar E, Dalgın G, Sozuoz A, Onurlu K, Cin S. Frequency of factor V (1691-> A) mutation in Turkish population. Thromb Haemost 1997; 78: 1527-8.
  6. Okumus G, Kiyan E, Arseven O, Tabak L, Diz-Kucukkaya R, Unlucerci Y, et al. Hereditary thrombophilic risk factors and venous thrombo- embolism in Istanbul, Turkey: the role in different clinical manifes- tations of venous thromboembolism. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2008;14:168-73. [CrossRef] Rees DC, Cox M, Clegg JB. World distribution of factor V Leiden. Lancet 1995; 346: 1133-4. [CrossRef] Koster T, Rosendaal FR, de Ronde H, Briët E, Van