SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

The Relationship between Interactional Justice and Affective Commitment: The Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Support

Etkileşimsel Adalet ve Duygusal Bağlılık İlişkisi: Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin Düzenleyici Rolü

ALPTEKİN SÖKMEN
GÖKHAN KENEK
EMRE BURAK EKMEKÇİOĞLU
Pages
196–214
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As employees' perception of organizational support increases, the positive effect of interactional justice on affective commitment was found to be higher

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine the moderating role of perceived organizational support in the relationship between interactional justice and affective commitment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data of this study were obtained from 198 participants working in different departments in a public institution in Ankara and the interrelationships between variables were examined by means of correlation and regression analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As employees' perception of organizational support increases, the positive effect of interactional justice on affective commitment was found to be higher
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the moderating role of perceived organizational support in the relationship between interactional justice and affective commitment. The data of this study were obtained from 198 participants working in different departments in a public institution in Ankara and the interrelationships between variables were examined by means of correlation and regression analysis. The results reveal that positive and significant relationships were found between interactional justice, affective commitment and perceived organizational support. As employees' perception of organizational support increases, the positive effect of interactional justice on affective commitment was found to be higher

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı etkileşimsel adaletin, duygusal bağlılıkla olan ilişkisinde algılanan örgütsel desteğin düzenleyici rolünü incelemektir. Araştırmanın verileri Ankara'da yer alan bir kamu kurumunda farklı bölümlerde çalışan 198 katılımcıdan elde edilmiştir ve değişkenler arası ilişkiler korelasyon ve regresyon analizleri ile incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre etkileşimsel adalet, duygusal bağlılık ve algılanan örgütsel destek arasında pozitif yönlü ve anlamlı ilişkiler bulunmuştur. Bununla birlikte çalışanların örgütsel destek algıları arttıkça, etkileşimsel adaletin duygusal bağlılığa olan pozitif yönlü etkisinin daha yüksek olduğu da tespit edilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖKMEN, A., KENEK, G., EKMEKÇİOĞLU, E. B. (2017). The Relationship between Interactional Justice and Affective Commitment: The Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Support. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 196–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/269387

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adams, J. S. (1965). “Inequity in Social Change”, L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, New York, II, 267 – 299. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage. Allen, D. G., (2003), The Role Of Perceived Organizational Support And Supportive Human Resource Practices in The Turnover Process, Journal Of Management, 29(1), 99–118
  2. Allen, N. J., Meyer J.P. (1990). The Measurement And Antecedents Of Affective, Continuance And Normative Commitment To The Organization, Journal Of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
  3. Ambrose, M. L., Schminke, M. (2003). Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational, support, and supervisory trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 295-305.
  4. Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S., Chen, Z. X. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 267-285
  5. Asgari, A., Silong, A. D., Ahmad, A., Abu Samah, B. (2008). The relationship between leader-member exchange, organizational inflexibility, perceived organizational support, interactional justice and organizational citizenship behaviour. African Journal of Business Management, 2(8), 138-145.
  6. Ay, G., Koç, H. (2014). Örgütsel adalet algısı ile örgütsel bağlılık düzeyi arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi: öğretmenler üzerinde bir inceleme. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 67-90.
  7. Barling, J., Philips, M. (1993),
  8. Interactional, Formal, And Distributivejustice İn The Workplace: An Exploratory Study, The Journal Of Psychology, 127(6), 649-656.
  9. Baron, R. M., Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. Becker, H. S. (1960).
  10. Notes On The Concept Of Commitment, American Journal Of Sociology, 66(1), 32-40
  11. Bies, R. J. (1986). Interactional justice. In The Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace. Bies, R.J., Moag, J.S. (1986) Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1, 43-55.
  12. Blau, Peter M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley Buchanan, B. (1974), Building Organizational Commitment: The Socialization Of Managers In Work Organizations, Administrative Science Qua