SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

The Determinants of Organizational Cynicism: An Exploration with Perceived Workload, Perceived Fairness and Control

Örgütsel Sinizmin İş Yükü, Algılanan Adalet ve Kontrol Açısından İncelenmesi

Algılanan ADALET
Selin Metin CAMGÖZ
ÖZGE TAYFUR EKMEKCİ
PINAR BAYHAN KARAPINAR
Pages
40–59
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This result reveals that perceived control plays a critical role in regulating the attitudes toward their work environment mainly organizational cynicism

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of this study is to examine the mediating role of perceived fairness and workload on the relationship between perceived control and organizational cynicism.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were gathered from 201 academicians.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This result reveals that perceived control plays a critical role in regulating the attitudes toward their work environment mainly organizational cynicism
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to examine the mediating role of perceived fairness and workload on the relationship between perceived control and organizational cynicism. Data were gathered from 201 academicians. The respondents completed areas of worklife survey and organizational cynicism questionnnarie. The results of the latent variable path analysis showed that perceived fairness and workload act as mediators on perceived control-organizational cynicism relationship. Thus, academicians who perceive control over the decisions and practices in their workplace, believe that the fairness of those decisions and practices are fair and perceive their workload as more manageable. Subsequently, such beliefs mitigate the negative and cynic attitudes toward their organizations. This result reveals that perceived control plays a critical role in regulating the attitudes toward their work environment mainly organizational cynicism

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, algılanan kontrolün örgütsel sinizm üzerindeki etkisinde çalışanların adalet ve iş yükü algılamalarının aracı rolü olup olmadığını ortaya çıkarmaktır. Araştırmaya konu olan veriler toplam 201 akademik personelden elde edilmiştir. Katılımcılar, çalışma yaşam alanları ve örgütsel sinizm anketlerine yanıt vermişlerdir. Örtük değişkenlerle yapılan yol analizinde, algılanan iş yükü ve adaletin, kontrol ve örgütsel sinizm arasındaki ilişkide aracılık rolleri üstlendiği tespit edilmiştir. Şöyle ki, iş yerindeki karar ve uygulamalarda söz sahibi olan akademik personel, hem üniversitedeki uygulamaların adil olduğuna hem de iş yükünün yönetilebilir düzeyde olduğuna inanmakta ve bu da onların çalıştıkları kurumlarına yönelik olumsuz ve şüpheci tutumlarını azaltmaktadır. Elde edilen bu sonuç, algılanan kontrolün çalışanların işe ilişkin tutumlarını (özellikle örgütsel sinizmi) etkilemede kritik role sahip olduğunu göstermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

ADALET, A., CAMGÖZ, S. M., EKMEKCİ, Ö. T., KARAPINAR, P. B. (2017). The Determinants of Organizational Cynicism: An Exploration with Perceived Workload, Perceived Fairness and Control. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 40–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/269375

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abraham, R. (2000). “Organizational cynicism: Bases and consequences”, Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, Vol. 126, No.3, 269-292.
  2. Andersson, L. M. (1996). “Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework”, Human Relations, Vol. 49, No.11, 1395-1418.
  3. Andersson, L. M., Bateman, T. S. (1997). “Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.18, 449-469.
  4. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., De Boer, E., Schaufeli, W. B. (2003). “Job demands and job resources as predictors of absence duration and frequency”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 62, No.2, 341-356.
  5. Barefoot, J. C., Dodge, K. A., Peterson, B. L., Dahlstrom, W. G., Williams Jr, R. B. (1989). “The Cook-Medley hostility scale: item content and ability to predict survival”, Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol. 51, No.1, 46-57.
  6. Bennett, R. R., ve Schmitt, E. L. (2002). “The effect of work environment on levels of police cynicism: A comparative study” Police Quarterly, Vol. 5, No.4, 493-522.
  7. Bernerth, J. B., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., Walker, H. J. (2007). “Justice, cynicism, and commitment: A study of important organizational change variables” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 43, No.3, 303-326.
  8. Biswas, S., Kapil, K. (2017). “Linking perceived organizational support and organizational justice to employees’ in-role performance and organizational cynicism through organizational trust: a field investigation in India”, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 36, No.5, 696-711.
  9. Brandes, P., Dharwadkar, R., Dean, J. W. (1999). “Does organizational cynicism matter? Employee and supervisor perspectives on work outcomes” içinde Eastern Academy of Management Proceedings (pp. 150-153).
  10. Budak, G., & Sürgevil, O. (2013). “Tükenmişlik ve tükenmişliği etkileyen örgütsel faktörlerin analizine ilişkin akademik personel üzerinde bir uygulama”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt. 20, Sayı: 2, 95-108.
  11. Chiaburu, D. S., Peng, A. C., Oh, I. S., Banks, G. C., Lomeli, L. C. (2013). “Antecedents and consequences of employee organizational cynicism: A metaanalysis.”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 83, 181–197.
  12. Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Judge, T. A., Shaw, J. C. (2006). “Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 100, No:1, 110-127.
  13. Cook, W. W.,Medley, D. M. (1954). “Proposed host