SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

The Mediating Role of Psychological Contract Violation in Relationship between Psychological Entitlement and Counterproductive Behavior

Psikolojik Ayrıcalığın Üretkenlik Karşıtı Davranışlara Etkisi: Psikolojik Sözleşmenin İhlal Edilmesinin Aracılık Rolü

BANU SAADET ÜNSAL AKBIYIK
Pages
234–255
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of all analysis it is found that psychological entitlement is positively related with counterproductive behavior.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of psychological entitlement on counterproductive behavior and mediating role of psychological contract violation in relationship between psychological entitlement and counterproductive behavior.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The date of the study was collected from 148 white collar employees in private organizations in İstanbul.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of all analysis it is found that psychological entitlement is positively related with counterproductive behavior.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of psychological entitlement on counterproductive behavior and mediating role of psychological contract violation in relationship between psychological entitlement and counterproductive behavior. The date of the study was collected from 148 white collar employees in private organizations in İstanbul. The data was examined with Pearson correlation, regression and mediated regression analysis. According to the results of all analysis it is found that psychological entitlement is positively related with counterproductive behavior. It is also found that there is a partial mediation effect of psychological contract violation between psychological entitlement and counterproductive behavior.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, psikolojik ayrıcalığın üretkenlik karşıtı davranışlar üzerindeki etkisi ile bu etkide psikolojik sözleşmenin ihlal edilmesinin aracı rolünü belirlemektir. 148 beyaz yakalı işgörenden toplanan veriler, korelasyon, regresyon ve aracı değişkenli regresyon analizleri yardımıyla incelenmiştir. Yapılan regresyon analizi sonucunda psikolojik ayrıcalığın üretkenlik karşıtı davranışları anlamlı ve pozitif yönde etkilediği saptanmıştır. Ayrıca psikolojik ayrıcalık ile üretkenlik karşıtı davranışlar arasındaki ilişkide psikolojik sözleşmenin ihlal edilmesinin aracılık etkisine yönelik yapılan regresyon analizi sonuçlarına göre, psikolojik sözleşmenin ihlal edilmesinin psikolojik ayrıcalık ile üretkenlik karşıtı davranışlar arasındaki ilişkide kısmi aracılık rolü oynadığı belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKBIYIK, B. S. Ü. (2018). The Mediating Role of Psychological Contract Violation in Relationship between Psychological Entitlement and Counterproductive Behavior. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 234–255. https://ajindex.com/articles/268842

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aquino, K. ve Douglas, S., (2003). “Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hierarchical status”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.90, No.1, 195-208.
  2. Bakker, A.B. ve Demerouti, E., (2007). “The job demands-resources model: State of the art”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol.22, No.3, 309-328.
  3. Baron, R.M. ve Kenny, D.A., (1986). “The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”, Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol.51, No.6, 1173-1182.
  4. Brouer, R. L., Wallace, A. S. ve Harvey, P. (2011). When good resources go bad: The applicability of conservation of resource theory to psychologically entitled employees. Ed. P. L. Perrewe´ & D. C. Ganster, The role of individual differences in occupational stress and well being, (ss. 109–150),
  5. Bingley, UK: Emerald, Campbell, W.K., Bonacci, A.M., Shelton, J., Exline, J.J. ve Bushman, B.J. (2004)."Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure", Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 83, No. 1, 29-45.
  6. Cropanzano, R. ve Mitchell, M.S., (2005). “Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review”, Journal of Management, Vol.31, No. 6, 874-900.
  7. Coyle-Shapiro, J.A. ve Conway, N., (2005). “Exchange relationships: Examining psychological contracts and perceived organizational support”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90, No. 4, 774-802
  8. Deery, S.J., Iverson, R.D. ve Walsh, J.T., (2006). “Toward a better understanding of psychological contract breach: A study of customer service employees”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 91, No.1, 166-175.
  9. Demir, M. ve Tütüncü, Ö., (2010). “Ağırlama İşletmelerinde Örgütsel Sapma ile İşten Ayrılma Eğilimi Arasındaki İlişki”, Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, Vol.21, No.1, 64-74
  10. Douglas, S.C. ve Martinko, M.J., (2001). “Exploring the role of individual differences in the prediction of workplace aggression”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.86, No. 4, 547-559.
  11. Emerson, R.M., (1976). “Social exchange theory”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol.2, 335-362.
  12. Greenberger, E., Lessard, J., Chen, C. and Farruggia, S.P., (2008). “Self-entitled college students: Contributions of personality, parenting, and motivational factors”, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Vol.37, No.10, 1193-1204.
  13. Fisk, G.M., (2010). “I want it all and I want i