Journals / İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesıa ın chıldhood adenotonsıllectomy: A comparison regarding of recovery time and postoperative complication rate

Çocuk adenotonsillektomi anestezisinde desfluran ve sevofluran: Derlenme süresi ve postoperatif komplikasyon oranlarının karşılaştırılması

Pages
49–52
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The occurrence of recovery and adverse events between desflurane and sevoflurane were not significantly dif- ferent , except that the eye opening duration after anesthesia was significantly shorter in desflurane group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the recovery profiles and postoperative adverse events after general anesthesia with desflurane and sevoflu- rane in childhood adenotonsillectomy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Fiftyfour children, ASA physical status I, underwent conventional cold tonsillectomy and curettage adenoidectomy under general anesthesia with desflurane (n = 27) and sevoflurane (n =27) were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The occurrence of recovery and adverse events between desflurane and sevoflurane were not significantly dif- ferent , except that the eye opening duration after anesthesia was significantly shorter in desflurane group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the recovery profiles and postoperative adverse events after general anesthesia with desflurane and sevoflu- rane in childhood adenotonsillectomy. Material and Methods: Fiftyfour children, ASA physical status I, underwent conventional cold tonsillectomy and curettage adenoidectomy under general anesthesia with desflurane (n = 27) and sevoflurane (n =27) were evaluated retrospectively. Anesthesia recovery, eye opening, postoperative vomiting, coughing and laryngospasm were compared for two anesthetic regimens. Findings: The mean age was 6+0.41 (min-max: 3-11, 11 female, 16 male) in desflurane group and 6+0.46 (min-max: 3-12,female, 18 male) in sevoflurane group. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of age, gen- der, body mass index and operation duration (p>0.05) The mean time to eye opening following desflurane was 3.3+0.3 (1.37.5) minutes versus 6.3+0.5 (2.5-10.5) minutes following sevoflurane, difference was statistically significant (p=0.03, p<0.05). Recovery of both agent is similar, 35.56 minutes in desflurane 34.67 minutes in sevoflurane (p=0.07, p>0.05). There was no statistical difference in the postoperative vomitting, coughing, and laryngospasm, among two groups. P values were 0.55, 0.48, and 0.15 respectively. Conclusion: The occurrence of recovery and adverse events between desflurane and sevoflurane were not significantly dif- ferent , except that the eye opening duration after anesthesia was significantly shorter in desflurane group.

Özet

Amaç: Çocuklardaki adenotonsillektomilerde desfluran ve sevofluran’ın postoperatif derlenme özellikleri ve komplikasyon oranlarını karşılaştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntem: ASA skoru I olup soğuk bıçak tonsillektomi ve adenoid küretaj ameliyatında anestezik ajan olarak desfluran (27) ve sevofluran (27) kullanılan, 54 çocuk geriye dönük değerlendirildi. Her iki ajanla anestezi sonrasında der- lenme ve göz açma süreleri ile postoperatif kusma, öksürük ve laringospasm oranları karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Ortalama yaş desfluran grubunda 6+0.41 (3-11), -11 kız, 16 erkek- ve sevofluran grubunda ise 6+0.46 ( 3-12), -9 kız, 18 erkek- olarak hesaplandı. Her iki grup arasında yaş, cinsiyet, vücut kitle indeksi ve operasyon süresi açısından istatiksel olarak anlamlı fark yoktu (p>0.05). Ortalama göz açma süresi desfluran kullanılan olgularda 3.3+0.3 (1.3 - 7.5) da- kika, sevofluran kullanılan olgularda 6.3+0.5 (2.5 - 10.5) dakika olarak ölçüldü. Desfluran grubunda göz açma süresi istatiksel olarak anlamlı oranda kısa bulundu (p=0.03, p 0.05). Postoperatif kusma, öksürük ve laringospasm oranları her iki anestezik ajan için istatiksel olarak fark göstermedi. P değerleri sırasıyla 0.55, 0.48, ve 0.15 ola- rak bulundu. Sonuç: Desfluran ve sevofluran anestezi ile derlenme ve postoperatif komplikasyonlar arasında anlamlı fark saptanmadı. Yalnızca göz açma süresi desfluran grubunda istatiksel olarak anlamlı oranda kısa idi.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, İ. B., ÇUKUROVA, İ., CANER, G. M., ULUYOL, S., KÖSE, I., KALKIŞIM, C. (2014). Desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesıa ın chıldhood adenotonsıllectomy: A comparison regarding of recovery time and postoperative complication rate. İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 49–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/268633

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Karlsen KL, Persson E, Wennberg E, Stenqvist O. Anesthesia recovery and postoperative nausea and vomiting after breast surgery. A comparison between desflurane, sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000;44:489- 93. Cohen IT, Finkel JC, Hannallah RS, Hummer KA, Patel KM. The Effect of Fentanyl on the Emergence Characteristics After Desflurane or Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Children. Anesth Analg 2002;94:1178 –81. Lipka F, Wappler F, Leuwer R, Schulte Am Esch J. Postoperative nausea and vomiting pathophysiology, prophylaxis and treatment Laryngorhinootologie. 2002 Oct; 81(10):725-31.
  2. Klock PA, Czeslick EG, Klafta JM, Ovassapian A, Moss J. The Effect of Sevoflurane and Desflurane on Upper Airway Reactivity. Anesthesiology 2001; 94:963–7. Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, Wiener-Kronish JP, Young WL. Miller’s Anesthesia. Chapter 75, Feldman FA, Patel A. Anesthesia for Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Surgery 7 th ed Philadelphia, Churchill Livingstone 2009 p:2358-60.
  3. Nathanson MH, Fredman B, Smith I, White PF. Sevoflurane versus desflurane for outpatient anaesthesia: A comparison of maintenance and recovery profiles. Anesth Analg. 1995; 81: 1186–90. Loop T, Priebe HJ. Recovery after anesthesia with remifentanil combined with propofol, desflurane, or sevoflurane for otorhinolaryngeal surgery. Anesth Analg 2000; Jul; 91 (1): 123- 129. Welborn LG, Hannallah RS, Norden JM, Ruttimann UE, Callan CM. Comparison of emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane, desflurane and halothane in pediatric ambulatory patients. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:917–20. Isik Y, Goksu S, Kocoglu H, Oner U. Low flow desflurane and sevoflurane anaesthesia in children. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006; 23:60–4. Goff MJ, Arain SR, Ficke DJ, Uhrich TD, Ebert TJ. Absence of bronchodilation during desflurane anesthesia-A comparison to sevoflurane and thiopental. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:404–8. Eshima RW, Maurer A, King T, Lin B-K. A Comparison of Airway Responses During Desflurane and Sevoflurane Administration via a Laryngeal Mask Airway for Maintenance of Anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2003;96:701–5. Uzun S, Tuncer S, Tavlan A, Reisli R, Sarkılar G, Ökesli S. Çocuklarda Desfluran-Sevofluran Anestezisinin İdame ve Derlenme üzerine Olan Etkilerinin Karşılaştırılması Türk Anest Rean Dern Derg. 2003; 31: 415-21.