Journals / İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

The impact of the number of the removed lymph nodes on early and late morbıdıty in the early stage endometrıum cancer

Erken evre endometriyum kanserinde çıkarılan lenf düğüm sayısının erken ve geç morbidite üzerine etkisi

Pages
97–101
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Although the therapeutic efficacy of lymphatic dissection in the early stage endometrial cancer was the same with lymphatic sampling ,the incidence of morbidity was much less in the sampling group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In this paper we evaluated the relationship between the number of the removed lymph nodes and postoperative morbidity during the lymphadecetomy in the early stage endometrium cancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Seventy-two patients with the diagnosis of stage I-II endometrium cancer underwent radical hysterectomy + pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in Izmir Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetric, between 01.04.2002- 31.04.2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Although the therapeutic efficacy of lymphatic dissection in the early stage endometrial cancer was the same with lymphatic sampling ,the incidence of morbidity was much less in the sampling group.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In this paper we evaluated the relationship between the number of the removed lymph nodes and postoperative morbidity during the lymphadecetomy in the early stage endometrium cancer. Material and Method: Seventy-two patients with the diagnosis of stage I-II endometrium cancer underwent radical hysterectomy + pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in Izmir Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetric, between 01.04.2002- 31.04.2009. The clinical and the pathologic findings, immediate operative and postoperative records of the patients were reviewed. The mean follow-up time was fifty months. Findings: The analysis mainly focused on the comparison of the patients with 11 or fewer to more than 11 lymph nodes removed. The number of the patients who have had >11 nodes (Dissection group) removed and < 11 nodes (Sampling group) removed were more 37 (51,4%) and 35 (48,6%), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of recurrence and mortality. However, concomitant lymphatic dissection has resulted in longer anesthesia time and hospital stay, more blood loss as well as higher blood transfusion rates. Conclusion: Although the therapeutic efficacy of lymphatic dissection in the early stage endometrial cancer was the same with lymphatic sampling ,the incidence of morbidity was much less in the sampling group.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada erken evre endometriyum kanserinde çıkarılan lenf düğümü sayısı ile postoperatif morbidite arasındaki ilişki değerlendirildi. Gereç ve Yöntem: İzmir Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniğinde 01.04.2002- 31.04.2009 tarihleri arasında radikal histerektomi ve pelvik ve para-aortik lenfadenektomi yapılmış evre I-II endometriyum kanserli 72 hasta değerlendirmeye alındı. Hastaların klinik verileri, histopatolojik tümör özellikleri, operatif ve erken postoperatif veriler hastaneden ayrılana kadar kaydedildi. Hastalar ortalama olarak 50 ay izlendi. Bulgular: Çıkarılan lenf düğümü sayısı 11 ve daha az ve üzeri olan hastalar 2 gruba ayrılarak postoperatif verileri değerlen- dirildi. 11 ve daha az lenf düğümü çıkarılan hasta sayısı 35; 11 üzeri lenf düğümü çıkarılan hasta sayısı 37 idi. İki grup ara- sında mortalite ve yineleme açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmadı. Ancak lenfadenektomi daha uzun anestezi ve hastanede kalış süresi ile daha çok kan kaybı ve kan transfüzyonu ile sonuçlandı. Sonuç: Erken evre endometriyum kanserinde lenf diseksiyonunun morbidite üzerine olumsuz bir etkisi bulunmamakla birlik- te lenf örneklemesinden daha üstün olmadığı saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

UYSAL, D., AKSÜT, H., KÜÇÜK, İ., ASLAN, N., BALOĞLU, A., AKSÜT, A. G. (2012). The impact of the number of the removed lymph nodes on early and late morbıdıty in the early stage endometrıum cancer. İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 97–101. https://ajindex.com/articles/268608

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Jemal A, Thomas A, Mürray T, Thun NM. Cancer Statistics, 2002. CA cancer J Clin 2002; 52: 23-47
  2. Ries LLA, Eisner MP, Kosary CL et al. Seer Cancer Statistics Review, Bethesda: National Cancer Institute, 2001 3. Mariani A,Webb MJ; Keeney GL et al. Low-risk cancer: Is lymphadenectomy or radiotherapy necessary? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182 (6): 1506-19
  3. Kılgore L C, Partridge E E, Alvarez R D et al. Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: survival comparions of patients with and without pelvic node sampling. Gynecol Oncol 1995; 56: 29-33
  4. Creutzberg CL. Lymphadenectomy in apparent early-stage endometrial carcinoma: Do numbers count? J Clin Oncol. 2005; 40(1): 55–65
  5. Roberts JA, Brunetto VL, Keys HM et al. A phase III randomized study of surgery vs. surgery plus adjunctive radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma (GOG 99). Proc Soc Gynecol Oncol 1998; 29:70
  6. Creutzberg CL, van putten WL, Koper PC et al. Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: multicentre randomised trial. PORTEC Study Group. Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma. Lancet. 2000; 355(9213): 1404–11
  7. Walsh CS, Karlan BY. Lymphadenectomy’s role in early endometrial cancer: prognostic or therapeutic? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008; 100(23):1707–16
  8. Larson DM, Johnson K, Olson KA. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for surgical staging of endometriyal cancer: morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79(6): 998–1001.